8

is there any way to regularize the following divergent integral :

$$\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{dx}{xe^{x}(e^{x}-1)}$$

the integral comes from trying to find an analytic continuation of $$I(s)=s\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{dx}{2x}\left(E_{s/2}((\pi x)^{s/2})-1\right)\omega(x)-\left(E_{s/2}(( x)^{s/2})-1\right)e^{-x}$$ $E_{s}(x)$ is the mittag-leffler function . and admits the beautiful continuation : $E_{s}(x^{-1})=1-E_{-s}(x)$ and $$\omega(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}e^{-n^{2}\pi x}$$

which is the jacobi theta function in disguise

another representation of the integral above is - for a minute assume i'm correct about this equivalence - : $$I(s)=s\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{E_{s}(x^{s})-1}{xe^{x}(e^{x}-1)}dx$$

i was wondering if we can apply Riemann's trick, and replace this integral with a contour integral to obtain a meromorphic integral !?


following Riemann's trick, here is what i did :

start with contour integral :

$$I(s)=-s\oint_{c}\frac{E_{s}((-x)^{s})-1}{xe^{x}(e^{x}-1)}dx$$

the contour is the usual Hankel contour. consider $I(-s)$ :

$$I(-s)=s\oint_{c}\frac{E_{-s}((-x)^{-s})-1}{xe^{x}(e^{x}-1)}dx=-s\oint_{c}\frac{E_{s}((-x)^{s})}{xe^{x}(e^{x}-1)}dx$$

or

$$I(s)-I(-s)=s\oint_{c}\frac{dx}{xe^{x}(e^{x}-1)}=s\oint_{c}(-x)^{-1}e^{-x}dx-s\oint_{c}\frac{(-x)^{-1}dx}{e^{x}-1}$$

now :$$\oint_{c}(-x)^{-1}e^{-x}dx=\frac{-2\pi i}{\Gamma(1)}=-2\pi i$$ and the second integral could be thought of as:

$$\oint_{c}\frac{(-x)^{-1}dx}{e^{x}-1}=\lim_{z\rightarrow 0}\oint_{c}\frac{(-x)^{z-1}dx}{e^{x}-1}=-2i\lim_{z\rightarrow 0}\sin(\pi z)\Gamma(z)\zeta(z)=i\pi$$

or :

$$I(s)-I(-s)=-3\pi is$$

lets go back to the 1st integral, and expand the Mittag-leffler function :

$$I(s)=-s\oint_{c}\frac{E_{s}((-x)^{s})-1}{xe^{x}(e^{x}-1)}dx=-s\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{\Gamma(1+ns)}\oint_{c}\frac{(-x)^{sk-1}dx}{e^{x}(e^{x}-1)}$$ $$=s\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{2i \sin(k\pi s)\Gamma(ks)}{\Gamma(1+ns)}\left(\zeta(ks)-1\right)=2i\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\sin(k\pi s)\frac{\zeta(ks)-1}{k}$$

now the problem becomes finding a function of the variable s -lets call it $A(s)$- such that:

$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\sin(k\pi s)\frac{\zeta(ks)-1}{k}=A(s)\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\zeta(ks)-1}{k}$$

if we define :

$$k(s)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\zeta(ks)-1}{k}$$

then :

$$A(s)k(s)-A(-s)k(-s)=-\frac{3}{2}\pi s$$ and the problem becomes proving the existence of $A(s)$ for all s, and of course, finding it !!

Anixx
  • 9,119

1 Answers1

15

Edit

The formula proposed by Tom may be obtained with the classical method : $$\int_0^{\infty} \frac{x^{s-1}}{e^x(e^x-1)} dx $$ $$ = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \int_0^{\infty} x^{s-1} e^{-nx} dx$$ $$ = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \int_0^{\infty} \left(\frac{t}{n}\right)^{s-1} e^{-t} dt/n $$ $$ = \left(\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^s}\right) \int_0^{\infty} t^{s-1} e^{-t} dt $$ $$ = \left(\zeta(s)-1\right) \Gamma(s)$$

As $s\to 0$ we have $\displaystyle \left(\zeta(s)-1\right) \Gamma(s)\sim -\frac 3{2s} +\frac 32\gamma-\frac{\ln(2\pi)}2$ (with $\gamma=\lim_{s\to 0} \frac 1s-\Gamma(s)$ the Euler constant $0.5772156649\cdots$ and $\frac{-\ln(2\pi)}2=\zeta'(0)$) which is still divergent...

I am not sure that we can avoid this because of the equivalence $\int \frac 1{x^2} dx$ near $0$ but perhaps that your 'regularization' could consist in the limit : $\displaystyle \lim_{\epsilon\to 0} \frac{\left(\zeta(-\epsilon)-1\right) \Gamma(-\epsilon)+\left(\zeta(\epsilon)-1\right) \Gamma(\epsilon)}2=\frac 32\gamma-\frac{\ln(2\pi)}2$
or a symmetrical pondered integral centered at $0$ with the same result...


Corresponding series

Let's substitute this definition of the Mittag-Leffler function : $$\operatorname{E}_s(z)=\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{z^k}{\Gamma(sk+1)}$$ in your integral : $$I(s)=s\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{E_{s}(x^{s})-1}{xe^{x}(e^{x}-1)}dx$$ $$I(s)=s\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{x^{sk}}{\Gamma(sk+1)}}{xe^{x}(e^{x}-1)}dx=s\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac 1{\Gamma(sk+1)}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{ x^{sk-1}}{e^{x}(e^{x}-1)}dx$$

We may use our previous result to rewrite $I(s)$ as : $$I(s)=s\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac {\left(\zeta(sk)-1\right) \Gamma(sk)}{\Gamma(sk+1)}$$ this becomes the simple (and convergent if $\Re(s)>0$ and $\frac 1s$ not integer at least...) : $$\boxed{I(s)=\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac {\zeta(sk)-1}{k}}$$


Approximation and Visualization

We may remove the simple poles in this series at $s=\frac 1n$ for $n\in \mathbb{N}^*$ by subtracting $\frac 1{sk-1}$ at the numerator (Stieltjes expansion) with the hope of getting something simpler.
Indeed for $s$ small I found this rather accurate numerical approximation (relative error $<\frac 1{20000}$ in the rectangle $\Re(s)\in (10^{-5},2),\ |\Im(s)|<1$) :

$$\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac {\zeta(sk)-1-\frac 1{sk-1}}{k}\approx\frac {\ln(s)}2-0.95973512990747991661376-0.04053073339766363s+0.00026485233s^2$$

I think that the $\frac {\ln(s)}2$ term is exact (from numerical 'scaling properties') as well as the provided digits of the last three constants.

Since $\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac 1{k(sk-1)}=-\gamma -\psi\left(1-\frac 1s\right)$ with $\psi$ the digamma function we have the approximation : $$I(s)\approx -\gamma -\psi\left(1-\frac 1s\right) +\frac {\ln(s)}2-0.95973512990747991661376-0.04053073339766363s+0.00026485233s^2$$

that allows us to produce this picture of the imaginary part of $I(s)$ for $\Re(s)>0$ :

imaginary part

We observe a jump of amplitude $\pi$ (near the line $x=\Re(s)=0$ at the right around the line $y=\Im(s)=0$) coming from $\frac {\ln(s)}2$.

Let's observe that our expansion is analytic everywhere except at the simple poles $s=\frac 1n$ and the branch point $s=0$ allowing us to show the pictures of the imaginary and real part of the (possible) Riemann surface of the analytic extension of $I(s)$ on the whole plane (imagine an infinity of sheets superposed around the branch point $0$ generated by the $\frac {\ln(s)}2$ term) :

imaginary compl

real compl

Asymptotic Expansion (direct method)

We want to rewrite following variant of $I(s)$ as a Maclaurin series $P(s)$ : $$J(s):=\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac {\zeta(sk)-1-\frac 1{sk-1}}{k}-\dfrac{\ln(s)}2$$

Let's split the $-1$ at the numerator in two $-\frac 12$ terms to study the asymptotic behavior of this series (and obtain convergence of the individual 'power $\log$ integrals' we will see later...) : $$J(s)= \lim_{N\to\infty} J_N(s)\ \ \text{with}\ \ J_N(s)=\sum_{k=1}^N \frac {\zeta(sk)-\frac 12-\frac 1{sk-1}}{k}-\frac 12 \sum_{k=1}^N \frac 1k -\frac{\ln(s)}2$$

Let's first show that $\ \lim_{N\to\infty} J_N(s)$ exists for any $s>0$ such that $\frac 1s \notin \mathbb{N}$ (so that all the terms of the sum are defined).

Since $\ \sum_{k=1}^N \frac 1k= H_n=\gamma +\ln\bigl(N+\frac 12\bigr) + \operatorname{O}\bigl(\frac 1N\bigr)\ $ we have $\frac 12 \sum_{k=1}^N \frac 1k +\frac{\ln(s)}2=\frac {\gamma}2+\frac 12 \ln\bigl(s\bigl(N+\frac 12\bigr)\bigr)+\operatorname{O}\bigl(\frac 1N\bigr)=\frac {\gamma}2+\frac {\ln(sN)}2+\operatorname{O}\bigl(\frac 1N\bigr)$

For $sN \gg 1$ we have (setting $x:=sk$) : $$s\sum_{k=N}^M \frac {\zeta(sk)-\frac 12-\frac 1{sk-1}}{sk}\sim \int_{sN}^{sM} \frac {\zeta(x)-\frac 12-\frac 1{x-1}}{x}\,dx$$
the error is of order $\frac 1N$ because of the $H_M-H_N$ terms and because $\zeta(x)-1 \sim 2^{-x}$ for $x \gg 1$.

A precise evaluation of the last integral is : $\left[\frac 32 \ln(x) -\ln(x-1)+\sum_{k>1} \operatorname{Ei}(-x\ln(k))\right]^{sM}_{sN}$ (with $\operatorname{Ei}$ the exponential integral and $\operatorname{Ei}(-u)\sim \frac {e^{-u}}{-u}$ for $u\gg 1$) but this isn't needed since the integral is clearly equivalent to $\frac 12 \left[\ln(x)\right]^{sM}_{sN}\ $ with again an error of order $\frac 1N$ for $sN\gg 1$.

Both $\frac {\ln(sN)}2$ terms cancel in $J_N(s)$ for large $sN$ so that the limit $J(s)$ exists for $s>0$ (for $\frac 1s \in \mathbb{N}$ $J(s)$ may be defined as a limit since we removed the poles).

Let's use the Euler Maclaurin asymptotic formula with $f(k)=\frac {\zeta(sk)-\frac 12-\frac 1{sk-1}}{k}$ to expand directly $J_N(s)$ : $$\sum_{k=0}^N f(k) \sim \int_0^N f(x) dx +\frac {f(0)+f(N)}2+\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{B_{2k}}{(2k)!} \bigl(f^{(2k-1)}(N)-f^{(2k-1)}(0)\bigr)$$ becomes : $$ s\sum_{k=0}^N \frac {\zeta(sk)-\frac 12-\frac 1{sk-1}}{sk}\sim \int_0^{sN} \frac {\zeta(x)-\frac 12-\frac 1{x-1}}{x}\,dx + \frac {f(0)+f(N)}2+\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{B_{2k}}{(2k)!} \left(f^{(2k-1)}(N)-f^{(2k-1)}(0)\right)$$

Note that we started at $k=0$ with $\displaystyle\ f(0)=\lim_{k\to 0}\ s\frac {\zeta(sk)-\frac 12-\frac 1{sk-1}}{sk}=(1+\zeta'(0))s\ $
and that, for any $n\in \mathbb{N}^*$, we have :
$f^{(n-1)}(0)=\lim_{N\to 0}\ s\left(\frac d{dN}\right)^{n-1}\ \left(\frac {\zeta(sN)-\frac 12-\frac 1{sN-1}}{sN}\right)=\lim_{N\to 0}\ s\left(\frac {s\cdot d}{d(sN)}\right)^{n-1} (\cdots)=\lim_{x\to 0}\ s^n\left(\frac {\zeta(x)-\frac 12-\frac 1{x-1}}x\right)^{(n-1)}=s^n\lim_{x\to 0} \frac{\left(\zeta(x)-\frac 1{x-1}\right)^{(n)}}n$

or simply $\ \displaystyle f^{(n-1)}(0)=\frac{n!+\zeta^{(n)}(0)}n s^n\ $ for $n>0$

For $n\ge 0$ and $N \gg 1$ we may show that $f^{(n)}(N)\sim \frac {(-1)^n n!}{2 N^{n+1}}\ $ so that the Euler Maclaurin asymptotic formula becomes (after removing $\frac{H_N+\ln(s)}2$ on both sides to get $J_N(s)$ at the left) :

$$J_N(s)= s\sum_{k=0}^N \frac {\zeta(sk)-1-\frac 1{sk-1}}{sk}-\ln(s)\sim \int_0^{sN} \frac {\zeta(x)-\frac 12-\frac 1{x-1}}x\,du - \frac {\gamma}2-\frac {\ln(sN)}2+\operatorname{O}\bigl(\frac 1N\bigr)+ \frac {f(0)}2-\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{B_{2k}}{(2k)!} f^{(2k-1)}(0)$$

At this point let's rewrite $\ln(sN)=\int_0^{sN} \frac 1{x+1}\,du+\operatorname{O}\bigl(\frac 1N\bigr)$ and go at the limit $N\to \infty$ : $$J(s)\sim - \frac {\gamma}2+\int_0^\infty \frac {\zeta(x)-\frac 12-\frac 1{x-1}}x-\frac 1{2(x+1)}\,dx + \frac {f(0)}2-\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{B_{2k}}{(2k)!} f^{(2k-1)}(0)$$

We recognize a Maclaurin series in $s$ : $$J(s)\sim K_0 -K_1 \frac s2-\sum_{k=1}^\infty K_{2k} \frac{B_{2k}}{(2k)!} s^{2k} $$

with the constant term given by $\displaystyle\ \boxed{K_0:= -\frac{\gamma}2 +\int_0^\infty \frac {\zeta(x)-\frac 1{x-1} -\frac 12 }x -\frac 1{2(1+x)}\,dx}$

(the numerical value is $K_0=-0.95973512990\cdots$ as wished ; I don't know a closed form...)

and the $K_n$ coefficients of $s^n$ by $\boxed{K_n:=\frac{n!+\zeta^{(n)}(0)}n}\ \text{for} \ n>0$

The wished analytic extension of $I(s)$ will be :

$$\boxed{I(s)\sim -\gamma -\psi\left(1-\frac 1s\right) +\frac {\ln(s)}2+K_0 -K_1 \frac s2-\sum_{k=1}^\infty K_{2k} \frac{B_{2k}}{(2k)!} s^{2k}}$$

Short table of $K_n$ values :
($\gamma_n$ is the nth Stieltjes constant : $\gamma_0= \gamma,\ \gamma_1= 0.07281584548367672486058\cdots$)

$\displaystyle K_1=1+\zeta'(0)=1-\frac{\ln(2\pi)}2=0.0810614667953272582\cdots$ $\displaystyle K_2=1+\frac{\zeta''(0)}2=1-\frac{\ln(2\pi)^2}4+\frac{\gamma^2}4-\frac{\pi^2}{48}-\frac{\gamma_1}2= -0.0031782279542924256\cdots$ $K_3=\frac{3!+\zeta'''(0)}3=-0.00157038895408481592\cdots$
$K_4=\frac{4!+\zeta^{(4)}(0)}4=0.0007242029965730102531\cdots$

($-\frac {K_1}2$ and $-\frac {K_2}{12}$ may be compared to the coefficients for $s$ and $s^2$ obtained previously : $-0.040530733397\cdots$ and $0.00026485233\cdots$).

(it is interesting to observe that $\zeta^{(n)}(0)\approx -n!$ as well as $\zeta^{(n)}\left(\frac 12\right)\approx -2^{n+1}n!$)


Asymptotic Expansions (the same result after an excursion with Mittag-Leffler, another expression for $K_0$)

To get the exact terms of the expansion of $I(s)$ let's provide the Maclaurin expansion in $s$ of $s\left(E_s(x^s)-1\right)$ (the coefficients are functions of $x$ that we will have to integrate later over $\mathbb{R}^+$) :

$$s\left(E_s(x^s)-1\right)=C_0(x) e^x-\frac s2-\frac{s^2}{12}\left[\ln(x)+\gamma\right]+\frac{s^4}{720}\left[\ln(x)^3+3\gamma\ln(x)^2+3\left(\gamma^2-\zeta(2)\right)\ln(x)+\gamma^3-3\gamma\zeta(2)+2\zeta(3)\right]-\frac{s^6}{30240}\left[\ln(x)^5+5\gamma\ln(x)^4+10\left(\gamma^2-\zeta(2)\right)\ln(x)^3+10\left(\gamma^3-3\gamma \zeta(2)+2\zeta(3)\right)\ln(x)^2+5\left(\gamma^4-6\gamma^2\zeta(2)+8\gamma \zeta(3)+\pi^4/60\right)\ln(x)+\gamma^5-10\gamma^3\zeta(2)+20\gamma^2\zeta(3)+\gamma\pi^4/12-20\zeta(2)\zeta(3)+24\zeta(5) \right]+P_8(\ln(x))\operatorname{O}\bigl(s^8\bigr)$$

The term independent of $s$ : $C_0(x) e^x$ with $\displaystyle C_0(x)=\int_0^1 \frac{\gamma(t,x)}{\Gamma(t)}\,dt\ $ (and $\gamma(t,x)$ the lower 'incomplete gamma function') was obtained by considering the limit as $n\to \infty$ of formula (3.4) from Haubold's paper (with $s=\frac 1n$) : $$E_{\frac 1n}\left(x^{\frac 1n}\right)=e^x\left[1+\sum_{r=1}^{n-1}\frac{\gamma\left(1-\frac rn ,x\right)}{\Gamma\left(1-\frac rn\right)}\right]$$

A shorter expression for the Maclaurin expansion (that could again be obtained with Euler-Maclaurin) should be :

$$\boxed{s\left(E_s(x^s)-1\right)\sim C_0(x) e^x-\frac s2-\sum_{n=2}^\infty s^n\frac{B_n}{n!}\ \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \binom{n-1}{k} S_k \ln(x)^{n-1-k}} $$

with $B_n$ the 'Bernoulli numbers' ($B_{2n+1}=0$ for $n>0$) and $S_k$ the coefficients appearing in the expansion of the reciprocal gamma function at $z=0$ (and at $z=1$) : $$\frac 1{\Gamma(s)}=\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac {S_k}{k!} s^{k+1}\ \ \text{so that}\ \ S_k=\lim_{s\to 0} \left(\frac 1{\Gamma(s+1)}\right)^{(k)}$$

$S_0=1$
$S_1=\gamma$
$S_2=\gamma^2-\zeta(2)$
$S_3=\gamma^3-3\gamma \zeta(2)+2\zeta(3)$
$S_4=\gamma^4-6\gamma^2\zeta(2)+8\gamma \zeta(3)+\pi^4/60$
$S_5=\gamma^5-10\gamma^3\zeta(2)+20\gamma^2\zeta(3)+\gamma\pi^4/12-20\zeta(2)\zeta(3)+24\zeta(5)$

$C_0$ too may be rewritten with the $S_k$ terms as $\displaystyle C_0(x)=\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{S_k}{(-\ln(x))^{k+1}}$.


We will again start with : $\displaystyle J(s)= \lim_{N\to\infty} J_N(s)$ with $\ \displaystyle J_N(s)=\sum_{k=1}^N \frac {\zeta(sk)-\frac 12-\frac 1{sk-1}}{k}-\frac 12 \sum_{k=1}^N \frac 1k -\frac{\ln(s)}2$

but will use Mittag-Leffler after that : $$J_N(s)=s\sum_{k=1}^N \frac {\zeta(sk)\Gamma(sk)-\frac {\Gamma(sk)}2-\frac {(sk-1)\Gamma(sk-1)}{sk-1}}{(sk)\Gamma(sk)}-\frac 12 \sum_{k=1}^N \frac 1k -\frac{\ln(s)}2$$

$$J_N(s)=s\sum_{k=1}^N \frac {\zeta(sk)\Gamma(sk)-\frac {\Gamma(sk)}2-\Gamma(sk-1)}{\Gamma(sk+1)}-\frac 12 \sum_{k=1}^N \frac 1k -\frac{\ln(s)}2$$

Let's rewrite everything in integral form (using $\ \sum_{k=1}^N \frac 1k= \gamma +\int_0^N \frac 1{1+x} + \operatorname{O}\bigl(\frac 1N\bigr)\ $, $\Gamma(u)=\int_0^\infty t^{u-1} e^{-t} dt\ $ and considering the limit as $N\to \infty$) :

$$J_N(s)=\sum_{k=1}^N \left( \frac s{\Gamma(sk+1)}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{x^{sk-1}}{e^x-1}-\frac {x^{sk-1}}{2e^x}-\frac {x^{sk-1}}{x e^x}\,dx\right)-\frac{\gamma}2 -\frac{\ln(N s)}2+\operatorname{O}\bigl(\frac 1N\bigr)$$

$$J_N(s)=-\frac{\gamma}2+\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\sum_{k=1}^N \frac {sx^{sk}}{\Gamma(sk+1)}}{xe^{x}}\left(\frac {e^x}{e^{x}-1}-\frac 12-\frac 1x\right)\,dx -\frac{\ln(N s)}2+\operatorname{O}\bigl(\frac 1N\bigr)$$

$$J_N(s)=-\frac{\gamma}2 +\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\sum_{k=1}^N \frac {sx^{sk}}{\Gamma(sk+1)}}{xe^{x}}\left(\frac {e^x}{e^{x}-1}-\frac 12-\frac 1x\right)+\frac{e^{-N s x}-e^{-x}}{2x}\,dx +\operatorname{O}\bigl(\frac 1N\bigr)$$

that becomes at the limit $N \to \infty$ :

$$J(s)\sim -\frac{\gamma}2 +\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\sum_{k=1}^\infty\frac {sx^{sk}}{\Gamma(sk+1)}}{xe^{x}}\left(\frac {e^x}{e^{x}-1}-\frac 12-\frac 1x\right)-\frac 1{2(1+x)}\,dx$$

$$\boxed{J(s)\sim -\frac{\gamma}2 +\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{s \left(E_{s}(x^{s})-1\right)}{xe^{x}}\left(\frac 1{e^{x}-1}-\frac 1x+\frac 12\right)-\frac 1{2(1+x)}\,dx}$$

From the MacLaurin expansion of $s \left(E_{s}(x^{s})-1\right)$ in powers of $s$, we get :

$$J(s)\sim K_0 -K_1 \frac s2-\sum_{n=2}^\infty K_n \frac{B_n}{n!} s^n $$

and the wished analytic extension of $I(s)$ :

$$\boxed{I(s)\sim -\gamma -\psi\left(1-\frac 1s\right) +\frac {\ln(s)}2+K_0 -K_1 \frac s2-\sum_{n=2}^\infty K_n \frac{B_n}{n!} s^n}$$

with the constant term given by : $$K_0:= -\frac{\gamma}2 +\int_0^\infty \frac{C_0(x)}x\left(\frac 1{e^{x}-1}-\frac 1x+\frac 12\right)-\frac 1{2(1+x)}\,dx$$

with the same numerical value and the $K_n$ coefficients of $s^n$ for $n>0$ by :

$$K_n:= \sum_{m=0}^{n-1} f_m \binom{n-1}{m} S_{n-1-m}$$

with :

$$f_m:=\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\ln(x)^m}{xe^{x}}\left(\frac 1{e^{x}-1}-\frac 1x+\frac 12\right)\,dx$$

Let's use (with a derivation similar to the previous one!) :

$$Z(s):=\left(\zeta(s)-\frac 1{s-1}-\frac 12\right) \Gamma(s)=\int_0^{\infty} \frac{x^s}{xe^{x}}\left(\frac 1{e^{x}-1}-\frac 1x+\frac 12\right)\,dx$$ (the idea of the additional term $-\frac 1x+\frac 12$ appeared in the Hermite-Stieltjes letters of 1885 allowing to extend the integral giving zeta near $x=0$ by removing the $\frac 1{x^2}$ and $\frac 1x$ singularities ; just some pages later we find the famous claim of Stieltjes of a proof of R.H. !)

since $x^s=e^{s\ln(x)}$ we get : $$f_m= Z^{(m)}(0)=\lim_{s\to 0}\left(\frac {d}{ds}\right)^m \left[\left(\zeta(s)-\frac 1{s-1}-\frac 12\right)\Gamma(s)\right]$$

From the binomial theorem it is clear that : $$K_{n+1}= \sum_{m=0}^n \binom{n}{m} f_m S_{n-m}= \lim_{s\to 0}\sum_{m=0}^n \binom{n}{m} Z^{(m)}\left(\frac 1{\Gamma(s+1)}\right)^{(n-m)}= \lim_{s\to 0} \left(\frac {Z(s)}{\Gamma(s+1)}\right)^{(n)}$$

allowing some simplifications : $$K_n=\lim_{s\to 0} \Bigl(\frac{\zeta(s)-\frac 1{s-1}-\frac 12}s\Bigr)^{(n-1)}=\lim_{s\to 0} \frac{\left(\zeta(s)-\frac 1{s-1}\right)^{(n)}}n\ \text{for} \ n>0$$ $$\text{i.e.}\ \ \boxed{K_n=\frac{n!+\zeta^{(n)}(0)}n}\ \text{for} \ n>0$$ i.e. the same result as previously


We could continue this very interesting subject and study the multiplicative partition (“Factorisatio Numerorum”) obtained by rewriting $\displaystyle I(s)=\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac {\zeta(sk)-1}{k}$ as the logarithm of $\displaystyle \prod_{n>1} \frac 1{1-n^{-s}}$ getting this Dirichlet series or... but I'll have to make all this visible one day so...

Sorry if all this is not exactly what you hoped...

Raymond Manzoni
  • 43,021
  • 5
  • 86
  • 140
  • Indeed, when I simply started with the OP given integral, I ended up with $\Gamma(0) \cdot (1+1+1+1+\cdots)$ so I realized there wasn't much hope for his integral. – Pedro May 01 '12 at 08:30
  • @Peter: the missing first $1$ can't be seen in your solution! :-) – Raymond Manzoni May 01 '12 at 08:32
  • can you address my question regarding riemann's trick !? – Mohammad Al Jamal May 01 '12 at 12:02
  • @MohammadAlJamal: at this point I fear no. I looked only at the limit case $s\to 0^+$ of $s(E_s(x^s)-1)$ and would conjecture that it behaves like $\frac 1{\log(x)}\left(-1+\frac{\gamma}{\log(x)}+\operatorname{O}\Bigl(\frac 1{\log(x)^2}\Bigr)\right)$ for $x\ll 1$ and like $e^x$ for $x\gg 1$ (this last point is well known) with a regular progression between these limits but this is far from an answer to your second question... – Raymond Manzoni May 01 '12 at 12:34
  • consider the contour integral : $$s\oint {\gamma}\frac{E{s}((-x)^{s})-1}{xe^{x}(e^{x}-1)}dx$$ , where the contour starts and ends at $+\infty$ and circles the origin once. using this contour along with the Mellin-Barnes integral rep. of the mittag-leffler function, one can start working the analytic continuation of the original integral. – Mohammad Al Jamal May 01 '12 at 18:30
  • So, clearly the integrand of the divergent integral is required to negate the divergence that would otherwise be introduced by the k=0 term of $E_s$. You might look at the Hurwitz zeta function $\zeta(s,2)$ at Wikipedia to try to construct a contour integral continuation, and I believe for the zeta summation formula for $I(s)$ to converge that you need $Real(s)>1$. – Tom Copeland May 02 '12 at 13:49
  • yeah tom, i managed to get the zeta summation continued to $\Re(s)>0$ with simple poles at $1/n$,$n\in \mathbb{Z}$. and i'm trying to find weather i can continue it further or not !! thanks for the hint on the Hurwitz zeta – Mohammad Al Jamal May 02 '12 at 18:39
  • @TomCopeland .. can u please elaborate on this last integral !?!? – Mohammad Al Jamal May 03 '12 at 12:48
  • @RaymondManzoni ... the zeta summation is the original form of the problem, i managed to transform it to the integral rep. containing the Mittag-Leffler function with the hope of finding an analytic continuation. the zeta summation converges for $\Re(s)>1$.. i managed to get it continued to $\Re(s)>0$ as i mentioned earlier. weather there can be a continuation to the whole complex plan, is still an open question. – Mohammad Al Jamal May 03 '12 at 12:54
  • 1
    BTW another proposed rep: $$I(s)=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{\sigma -i\infty }^{\sigma +i\infty }\frac{\pi }{\sin(\pi \omega ) }exp(i\pi \omega )\frac{\zeta (-s\omega)-1 }{-\omega }d\omega $$ with $-1<\sigma<0$ and $s$ real and $>1/\sigma.$ Close the contour to the left to pick up simple poles at $-1,-2,-3,....$ You could put in an extra factor of $\frac{y^{-\omega}}{(-\omega)!}$ to make it an inverse Mellin transform. Then take the Laplace transform w.r.t. $y$ to get the above. (Updated comment) – Tom Copeland May 03 '12 at 14:03
  • Erratum: $s>-1/\sigma$ for the contour integral. – Tom Copeland May 04 '12 at 00:56
  • @MohammadAlJamal: I should have more time to look at all that this weekend. I have some doubts about using the Mittag-Leffler function for $s<0$ (because it comes usually with the constraint $s>0$!) but plotting $I(s)=\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac {\zeta(sk)-1}{k}$ for $\Re(s)$ near $0$ convinced me that an analytic extension could exist for $s<0$. Another possibility could be to start with the product $p(s)=\prod_{k=2}^\infty 1-k^{-s}$ because $I(s)=-\log(p(s))$ (convergence is worse and it requires $\Re(s)>1$ under this form but it will return you closed forms for $I(n)$ with $n$ integer $n>1$). – Raymond Manzoni May 04 '12 at 01:18
  • @RaymondManzoni.. the Mittag-leffler function has a meromorphic continuation to the whole complex plane via $E_{-s}(x)=1-E_{s}(x^{-1})$ . plz have a look here :http://arxiv.org/pdf/0909.0230v2.pdf – Mohammad Al Jamal May 04 '12 at 07:43
  • @MohammadAlJamal: Oops... yes you wrote that earlier. Your problem is clearer now : $E_{-s}(x^{-s})=1-E_s(x^s)$ so that the $-1$ at the numerator disappears from the integral, the $k=0$ term is reintroduced and convergence is lost... – Raymond Manzoni May 04 '12 at 09:15
  • 1
    @RaymondManzoni .. i guess there is still hope .. – Mohammad Al Jamal May 04 '12 at 09:55
  • the problem could be solved now if the following mellin integral is found :$$\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{2-i\infty}^{2+i\infty}\sin(n\pi s)\left(\frac{\zeta(ns)-1}{s} \right)x^{s}ds$$ n is an integer – Mohammad Al Jamal May 05 '12 at 20:30
  • @RaymondManzoni ... very nice indeed, would you plz have a look on the updates in my post ... i think i sorted it out, one last step is missing .. – Mohammad Al Jamal May 07 '12 at 08:12
  • here is my strategy for finding $A(s)$ : $$k(s)=s\int_{1}^{\infty}\Omega(x)x^{-s-1}dx$$

    for some function $\Omega(x)$ .Using Mellin inversion theorem, along with Mellin convolution, one can find a function $b(x)$, such that:

    $$b(x)=\Omega(x)\star a(x)$$

    where :

    $$a(x)\rightleftharpoons A(s)$$

    under Mellin transform .

    that being said, i'm stuck on doing the following Mellin type integral :

    $$\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{2-i\infty}^{2+i\infty}\sin(k\pi s)\frac{\zeta(ks)-1}{sk}x^{s}ds$$

    – Mohammad Al Jamal May 07 '12 at 09:27
  • $$\Omega(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left \lfloor x^{1/n} \right \rfloor-1}{n}$$ – Mohammad Al Jamal May 07 '12 at 09:29
  • 1
    @MohammadAlJamal: Many thanks for the Bounty! I'll further try to prove my expansion and search something simpler for your $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\sin(k\pi s)\frac{\zeta(ks)-1}{k}$ (concerning $A(s)$ it appears at least as complicated as $I(s)$ and I fear that your Mellin's integral doesn't inspire me... yet...). – Raymond Manzoni May 07 '12 at 23:22
  • @RaymondManzoni .. you are welcome ... maybe i didn't make myself clear . $$b(x)=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n}\int_{2-i\infty}^{2+i\infty}\sin(\pi ns)\left(\frac{\zeta(ns)-1}{s}\right)x^{s}ds$$... using devolution, we can find $a(x)$, hence $A(s)$ – Mohammad Al Jamal May 07 '12 at 23:32
  • +1. For your effort! Which software did you use for plotting? It looks really nice! –  May 24 '12 at 00:04
  • @Marvis: Thanks!! It's MuPAD (in Matlab now) and it generates even animations. – Raymond Manzoni May 24 '12 at 00:07
  • @RaymondManzoni Nice. I was not aware of MuPAD. Thanks! –  May 24 '12 at 00:40
  • @RaymondManzoni here is my email : [email protected] , could you plz write me, i want to send you some of my work. – Mohammad Al Jamal May 24 '12 at 16:34