Questions tagged [induction]

For questions about mathematical induction, a method of mathematical proof. Mathematical induction generally proceeds by proving a statement for some integer, called the base case, and then proving that if it holds for one integer then it holds for the next integer. This tag is primarily meant for questions about induction over natural numbers but is also appropriate for other kinds of induction such as transfinite, structural, double, backwards, etc.

Mathematical induction is a form of deductive reasoning. Its most common use is induction over well-ordered sets, such as natural numbers or ordinals. While induction can be expanded to class relations which are well-founded, this tag is aimed mostly at questions about induction over natural numbers.

In general use, induction means inference from the particular to the general. This is used in terms such as inductive reasoning, which involves making an inference about the unknown based on some known sample. Mathematical induction is not true induction in this sense, but is rather a form of proof.

Induction over the natural numbers generally proceeds with a base case and an inductive step:

  • First prove the statement for the base case, which is usually $n=0$ or $n=1$.
  • Next, assume that the statement is true for an input $n$, and prove that it is true for the input $n+1$.

The following variant goes without a base case: Assuming the statement is true for all $n\in\mathbb N$ with $n < N$, prove that is true for $N$, too. This has to be done for all $N\in\mathbb N$.

10150 questions
102
votes
2 answers

What's the difference between simple induction and strong induction?

I just started to learn induction in my first year course. I'm having a difficult time grasping the concept. I believe I understand the basics but could someone summarize simple induction and strong induction and explain what the differences are?…
Jake Park
  • 1,277
50
votes
6 answers

We all use mathematical induction to prove results, but is there a proof of mathematical induction itself?

I just realized something interesting. At schools and universities you get taught mathematical induction. Usually you jump right into using it to prove something like $$1+2+3+\cdots+n = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}$$ However. I just realized that at no point…
bodacydo
  • 3,922
40
votes
14 answers

Why doesn't mathematical induction work backwards or with increments other than $1$?

From my understanding of my topic, if a statement is true for $n=1$, and you assume a statement is true for arbitrary integer $k$ and show that the statement is also true for $k+1,$ then you prove that the statement's true for all $n\geq 1$. Makes…
39
votes
4 answers

What makes induction a valid proof technique?

What makes induction (over natural numbers) a valid proof technique? Is $$ \dfrac{ P(0) \quad \forall i \in \mathbb{N}. P(i) \Rightarrow P(i+1) }{ \forall n \in \mathbb{N}. P(n)} $$ just taken for granted as a proof rule, or can it be derived from…
Will
  • 505
38
votes
3 answers

Is my game fair?

Occasionally when I'm bored, I'll play a game: Pick a random positive integer $X$. Add $+1$, $0$, $-1$ to make it divisible by $3$. $^\dagger$ Divide by $3$ to create a new $X$. Repeat steps $2$ and $3$ until you reach $1$. $^\dagger$ Keep track…
RowlandB
  • 491
27
votes
5 answers

How does backwards induction work to prove a property for all naturals?

I was reading a blogpost here: http://mzargar.wordpress.com/2009/07/19/cauchys-method-of-induction/ (Wayback Machine) One thing that threw me off was that after the first four large displayed equations, there is the statement "it is sufficient to…
Nawlins
  • 273
23
votes
4 answers

What is the second principle of finite induction?

I understand the principle of finite induction, but my book then mentions that there is a variant of the first where requirement b is changed to If $k$ is a positive integer such that $1,2, \dots, k$ belong to $S$, then $k + 1$ must also be in…
qw3n
  • 443
21
votes
2 answers

Induction on two integer variables

Assume you want to prove an identity such as $$\sum_{k=m+1}^{n}A(k,m)-B(k,m)=S(m)+T(n,m)\qquad\text{for } n,m\in \mathbb{Z},n,m\geq 0.$$ Added: I applied mathematical induction on $m,n$ to prove it. I am unsure because up to now I have seen it…
21
votes
2 answers

Proving Inequalities using Induction

I'm pretty new to writing proofs. I've recently been trying to tackle proofs by induction. I'm having a hard time applying my knowledge of how induction works to other types of problems (divisibility, inequalities, etc). I've been checking out the…
20
votes
1 answer

Cauchy induction: are there examples of cases where choosing an integer other than $2$ is a better strategy?

Cauchy induction, sometimes called backwards induction, works as follows: show that $p(1)$ is true show that $p(n)$ implies $p(2n)$ (which inductively implies $p(2^n)$ is true) show that $p(n)$ implies $p(n-1)$ Then $p$ is true for all $n\geq 1$.…
17
votes
3 answers

Why can mathematical induction only be used with natural numbers?

So, I've been learning Principle of Mathematical Induction as part of my syllabus, and so far, I've found it to be really fun to do. There's one thing I don't understand though (and none of my teachers could answer this): Why is it necessary to…
15
votes
6 answers

Strong Induction Proof: Every natural number = sum of distinct powers of 2

The question I'm looking at, is to show that every positive integer $n$ can be written as a sum of distinct powers of two. I can see that you can form any number based on the highest $2^t$ that is less than the number, plus some combination of…
hobbes131
  • 661
14
votes
6 answers

How do you prove that proof by induction is a proof?

Are proofs by induction limited to cases where there is an explicit dependance on a integer, like sums? I cannot grasp the idea of induction being a proof in less explicit cases. What if you have a function that suddenly changes behavior? If a…
arynaq
  • 245
13
votes
2 answers

Inverted induction

I am working on a proof, and to do it, I think it would be optimally to use induction backwards. Show that 1 doesn't work. Assume n doesn't work. Prove that n+1 doesn't work. Is this valid?
Jimmy360
  • 649
13
votes
2 answers

Strong Induction proofs done with Weak Induction

I've been told that strong induction and weak induction are equivalent. However, in all of the proofs I've seen, I've only seen the proof done with the easier method in that case. I've never seen a proof (in the context of teaching mathematical…
gsgx
  • 789
1
2 3
99 100