I can't think of an "abstract" way to do what you are asking--- that is, I think the simplest and perhaps only thing to do is to explicitly evaluate the number
$$
\inf \{\|f\|: f \in K\}
$$
and then prove, using the knowledge of what this number is, that no element of $K$ can have this number as its norm.
If $f$ is in $K$, then (making use of some familiar inequalities)
$$
\begin{align}
1 & = \left|\int_0^{\frac{1}{2}} f(s) \, ds - \int_{\frac{1}{2}}^1 f(s) \, ds\right| \\
& \leq \left|\int_0^{\frac{1}{2}} f(s) \, ds\right| + \left| \int_{\frac{1}{2}}^1 f(s) \, ds\right| \\
& \leq \int_0^{\frac{1}{2}} |f(s)| \, ds + \int_{\frac{1}{2}}^1 |f(s)| \, ds \\
& \leq \int_0^{\frac{1}{2}} \|f\| \, ds +\int_{\frac{1}{2}}^1 \|f\| \, ds
= \|f\|.
\end{align}
$$
We conclude that $\inf \{\|f\|: f \in K\} \geq 1$.
Define for $n \geq 2$ the function $f_n: [0,1] \to \mathbb{R}$ by declaring its graph to be the union of the straight line segment from $(0,1)$ to $(\frac{1}{2}, 1)$, the straight line segment from $(\frac{1}{2},1)$ to $(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{n}, \frac{1+n}{1-n})$, and the straight line segment from $(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{n}, \frac{1+n}{1-n})$ to $(1, \frac{1+n}{1-n})$. Clearly $f_n \in C[0,1]$ for all $n$, and short calculations show that
$$
f_n \in K, \qquad \|f_n\| = \frac{n+1}{n-1}, \quad n \geq 2.
$$
Since $\inf \{\|f_n\|: n \geq 2\} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{n+1}{n-1} = 1$, it follows that $\inf \{\|f\|: f \in K\} \leq 1$, and hence that
$$
\inf \{\|f\|: f \in K \} = 1.
$$
I claim that it is impossible for $f \in K$ to satisfy $\|f\| = 1$.
Suppose $f$ in $C[0,1]$ satisfies $\|f\| = 1$. Then each inequality in the above proof that $\|f\| \geq 1$ is an equality. It is easy to see that since $f$ is continuous, the last inequality in that proof is an equality if and only if $|f(s)| = 1$ holds for all $s$. If your $C[0,1]$ is the set of real-valued functions on $[0,1]$ then we already have a contradiction, because a real-valued continuous function satisfying this condition must either be the constant $1$ or the constant $-1$, and a short check shows that neither of these satisfy the condition for membership in $K$. Otherwise we have to work a little harder: the second-to-last inequality being equality forces
$$
\left|\int_0^{\frac{1}{2}} f(s) \, ds\right| = \int_0^{\frac{1}{2}} |f(s)| \, ds
$$
and similarly for the integral from $\frac{1}{2}$ to $1$. But a short examination of your favorite proof of the general inequality $|\int_a^b f(s) \, ds| \leq \int_a^b |f(s)| \, ds$ should make apparent that equality holds in this general inequality if and only if if and only if there is a complex number $c$ with $|c| = 1$ and a nonnegative function $F$ with $f = cF$. Since the $f$ relevant to us is known to have constant modulus, we conclude that there are complex numbers $c_1$ and $c_2$ satisfying $|c_1| = |c_2| = 1$ and $f(x) = c_1$ for all $x \in [0, \frac{1}{2}]$ and $f(x) = c_2$ for all $x \in [\frac{1}{2}, 1]$. Continuity of $f$ forces $c_1 = c_2$; but then $\int_0^{\frac{1}{2}} f(x) \, dx - \int_{\frac{1}{2}}^1 f(x) \, dx = 0$ is not $1$, a contradiction.
\left
and\right
before parentheses to get them to adapt their size to their content. – joriki Nov 10 '11 at 08:46