This might help.
You don't take the gradient of a vector field, so $\nabla A$ makes no sense. Instead, the gradient is an operator that acts on scalar functions in $\mathbb{R}^n$ and produces a vector field on $\mathbb R^n$.
Now if $f(x,y)$ is a scalar function, then $\nabla f:=\langle f_x,f_y\rangle$.
As for the Laplacian operator, it is given by $\Delta=\nabla\cdot \nabla$, i.e. the divergence of the gradient. So for example, with the $f(x,y)$ above we would have $$\Delta f:=\nabla \cdot \nabla f=\nabla \cdot \langle f_x,f_y\rangle=f_{xx}+f_{yy},$$ and similarly for higher dimensions.
The Laplacian operator is an extremely important and ubiquitous operator throughout pure and applied mathematics, certainly in areas of PDE and physics.
A simple application of why the Laplacian operator is so central is because many important problems in applied mathematics and physics can be distilled down to this:
Suppose $\mathbf F$ is a given conservative vector field (meaning
$\mathbf F=\nabla f$ for some scalar function $f$) which is also
divergence-free (meaning $\nabla\cdot\mathbf F=0$). How do we find the
$f$ (called a potential function) associated with this vector field
$\mathbf F$?
The answer is quickly revealed: $$\mathbf F=\nabla f \implies \nabla \cdot\mathbf F=\nabla\cdot \nabla f\implies 0=\Delta f.$$ The potential $f$ is a solution of Laplace's equation! (In fact, this is why some books refer to it as the potential equation.