2

How is $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty}{(1+1/n)^n} = e$? Please help by letting me know why in a very simple way. Thank you.

Librecoin
  • 2,740
  • 5
    Well it depends on your definition of $e$. Often it is defined as that limit. – Daniel Robert-Nicoud Nov 06 '13 at 08:37
  • @DanielRobert-Nicoud What do you mean? If you plug in infinity for n, you would get 1^infinity, but why e? – Joshua Ree Nov 06 '13 at 08:38
  • 1
    Limits don not work just by "plugging $\infty$ into it". Indeed take for example $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{n}{n}$. It is obviously $1$, but if you just plug if $\infty$ for $n$ you get $\frac{\infty}{\infty}$, which is not defined. – Daniel Robert-Nicoud Nov 06 '13 at 08:41
  • 2
    Use the binomial theorem and look at what the coefficients converge to. – copper.hat Nov 06 '13 at 08:46
  • 1
    @JoMo Sometimes you can "plug in" $\infty$ and get a defined result. For example, the form $1 / \infty$ can be evaluated to zero. However, $1^{\infty}$ is an indeterminate form, as is for example $\frac00$ and $0 \times \infty$. – Daniel R Nov 06 '13 at 08:50
  • 2
    Hm, I'm sure this is a duplicate but I couldn't find it. – Lord_Farin Nov 06 '13 at 09:11
  • @Lord_Farin I have tried this search. I found for example this and this. Some questions about $(1+x/n)^n$ are mentioned here. – Martin Sleziak Nov 06 '13 at 13:11
  • 1
    This is possibly a duplicate of this question. In comments and answers to that question, there are other links to similar problems. In other words, this question has been asked several times before on this site. This question seems to be almost identical in statement. – robjohn Nov 06 '13 at 13:17
  • @JoMo Infinity is not a number and so you can't operate with it. If you tried to operate with it using intuition, one can get contradictory results. 1/∞ can't be zero, nor can it be above 0 (then the reciprocal of the value would be ∞ then) – Ramchandra Apte Nov 06 '13 at 13:43

7 Answers7

4

First you show that $a_n=(1+1/n)^n$ is increasing, $b_n=(1+1/n)^{n+1}$ is decreasing. Since $a_n\leq b_n,\ \forall n,$ both $a_n$ and $b_n$ converge, oviously to the same limit. Then you define $e:=\lim_{n\to\infty} a_n.$

3

This is the definition of $e$. I can say $\text{zafer}=\pi/2$, and this is a definition. There is no proof of this, because this is how I define $\text{zafer}$.

Zafer Sernikli
  • 881
  • 4
  • 11
2

I guess, what you really want to know is: How can I see, that the limit $$e = \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}(1+\frac{1}{n})^n$$ has the known properties like $\frac{d}{dx}e^x = e^x$.

First of all, the function $e^x$ can be easily expanded as an infinity series $e^x=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{x^n}{n!}$. Knowing, that this series is absolute convergent, on can simply derive each summand and see that $\frac{d}{dx}e^x = e^x$.

If you set $x=1$ you get a series, which is mentioned here as alternative definition of $e$. The prove that this definition is equivalent to yours can be found here.

Hope that answers your question.

staxyz
  • 133
1

Here is the basic fact that I think you are reaching for:

Let $T_n=(1+1/n)^n$. Let $S_n=1+1+1/2!+\ldots+1/n!$. Then the limits as $n$ tend to infinity of $T_n$ and $S_n$ (call them $T$ and $S$ repectively) exist and are equal.

Existence of $S$: $S_n$ is increasing and bounded above by \begin{equation*} 1+1+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2\cdot 2}+\frac{1}{2\cdot 2\cdot 2}+\ldots=3 \end{equation*}

Existence of $T$: Expand $T_n$ by the Binomial Theorem and rearrange to obtain \begin{align*} T_n=1+1&+(1-1/n)\frac{1}{2!}+(1-1/n)(1-2/n)\frac{1}{3!}+\ldots\\ &+(1-1/n)(1-2/n)\cdots(1-(n-1)/n)\frac{1}{n!}. \end{align*}

A term by term comparison between $T_n$ and $T_{n+1}$ shows that $T_n$ is increasing. A term-by-term comparison between $T_n$ and $S_n$ shows that $T_{n}\le S_n$. Since $S_n\le 3$ it follows that $T_n$ converges.

Proof that $T=S$: Since $S_n\le T_n$ it suffices to show that $T\ge S$. Fix $m<n$ and split the expression for $T_n$ given above into two parts $$T_n=P_{m,n}+Q_{m,n},$$ where \begin{align*} P_{m,n}=&1+1+(1-1/n)\frac{1}{2!}+(1-1/n)(1-2/n)\frac{1}{3!}+\ldots\\ &+(1-1/n)(1-2/n)\cdots(1-(m-1)/n)\frac{1}{m!} \end{align*} and \begin{align*} Q_{m,n}=&(1-1/n)(1-2/n)\cdots(1-m/n)\frac{1}{(m+1)!}+\ldots\\ &+(1-1/n)(1-2/n)\cdots(1-(n-1)/n)\frac{1}{n!}. \end{align*} Note that $Q_{m,n}\ge 0$. Note that as $n$ tends to infinity $P_{m,n}$ tends to $S_m$.

Therefore, taking limits as $n\to\infty$ of both sides of the equation $T_n=P_{m,n}+Q_{m,n}$, we obtain $$T=S_m+\lim_{n\to\infty}Q_{m,n}\ge S_m.$$ Since $m$ is arbitrary, it follows that $T\ge S$.

Crystal's Algebra Vol 2 is a wonderful source for such seat-of-the pants proofs.

falang
  • 559
1

Consider $$\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}(1+{1\over n})^n.$$ This limit has the indeterminate form $1^\infty$. Let $y=(1+{1\over n})^n$. Taking the natural logarithm of both sides of the equation and simplifying using the rules of logarithms we obtain $\ln(y)=n\ln(1+{1\over n})$. The $$\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \ln(y)=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}n\ln(1+{1\over n})$$ which has the indeterminate form $\infty\cdot 0$. We can rewrite the right-hand side limit as $$\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\ln(y)={\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}={\ln(1+{1\over n})\over {1\over n}}}$$ which has the indeterminate form ${0\over 0}$. Using L'Hospital's Rule we see that $$\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\ln(y)=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}{{1\over (1+{1\over n})}\cdot {-1\over n^2}\over {-1\over n^2}}.$$ This simplifies to $$\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \ln(y)=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}{1\over 1+{1\over n}}=1.$$ So far we have computed the limit of $\ln(y)$, what we really want is the limit of $y$. We know that $y=e^{\ln(y)}$. So $$\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}(1+{1\over n})^n=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} y=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} e^{\ln(y)}=e^1=e.$$ Thus $$\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} (1+{1\over n})^n=e.$$

1233dfv
  • 5,625
0

Firstly, you should note that as $n\rightarrow±\infty$, our expression becomes $(\rightarrow 1)^\infty$. Although an exact 1 raised to any number is 1 itself, our expression isn't exactly 1. It's tending to 1. So we can't compute the value by simply plugging in the value for n. That isn't solving a limit.

Let's approach it in another way:

Let $f(x) = (1 + \frac{1}{x})$
and $g(x) = x$

What you want to find out: $$\lim_{x\to a} f(x)^{g(x)}\\$$ $$\Large = \lim_{x\to a} e^{\ln f(x)^{g(x)}}$$ ($\because e^{\ln x} = x)$ $$\Large = \lim_{x\to a} e^{g(x).\ln f(x)}$$ ($\because \ln a^b = b\ln a)$

The index part is getting very tiny and squeezed up making it difficult to read - which is why I'm only solving the index below:

\begin{eqnarray} Let L &=& g(x).\ln f(x)\\ &=& g(x).\ln(1 + f(x) - 1)\\ &=& g(x).\frac{\ln\bigg(1 + \big(f(x) - 1\big)\bigg)}{\big(f(x) - 1\big)}.(f(x) - 1)\\ \end{eqnarray} We know that $f(x) - 1 \to0$ $(\because f(x) \to1)$; and that:
$$\lim_{x\to a} \frac{\ln(1 + x)}{x} = 1$$

So we get: $$L =\lim_{x\to a} g(x)\cdot(f(x) - 1)$$

Hence, your original expression is:

$$\Large e^\left({\lim\limits_{x\to a} g(x)\cdot(f(x) - 1)}\right)$$

Substituting the values for f(x) and g(x): $$\Large e^\left({\lim\limits_{x\to \infty} g(x)\cdot(f(x) - 1)}\right)$$ $$=\Large e^\left({\lim\limits_{x\to \infty} x\cdot(1 + \frac{1}{x} - 1)}\right)$$ $$=\Large e^\left({\lim\limits_{x\to \infty} x\cdot(\frac{1}{x})}\right)$$ $$=\Large e^1$$ $$=e$$

0

Let $e_n=(1+\frac{1}{n})^n, n>0$.

1) $e_n$ is increasing: $$e_n<e_{n+1}<=>(1+\frac{1}{n})^n <(1+\frac{1}{n})^{n+1}<=>\sqrt[n+1]{(1+1/n)^n}<1+\frac{1}{n+1}.$$

Last inequality is demonstrated by applying the AM-GM numbers:

$$1+\frac{1}{n},1+\frac{1}{n},...,1+\frac{1}{n}, 1.$$

Otherwise, compare term by term the sums of $e_n$ and $e_{n+1}$ developing with Newton's binomial.

2)$e_n$ is bounded by 3:

By mathematical induction shows that $$(1+\frac{1}{n})^k < 1+\frac{k}{n}+\frac{k^2}{n^2}$$ for $n>0$ and $k>0$ and then put $k=n.$

Otherwise, increase the sum obtained by developing the binomial terms of Newton to the sum

$$1+1+\frac{1}{1.2}+ \frac{1}{2.3}+...+\frac{1}{(n-1)n}<3.$$

Of 1) and 2) result that $e_n$ converges and the limit is denoted $e$.

medicu
  • 4,482