The statement holds for finitely generated modules over semisimple ring. More generally, the statement holds fo semisimlple finitely generated modules over arbitrary ring.
Consider a semisimple ring $R$. Then any right $R$-module $M$ is semisimple, which means that it is a direct sum of its simple submodules. If you further take $M$ to be finitely generated, then $M$ is finite direct sum of its simple submodules. (In the case of a general ring, just consider a finitely generated semisimple module $M$. The rest works in both cases.)
Suppose you have $K_1, K_2$ two isomorphic submodules of $M$. Then $M=K_1\oplus C_1=K_2 \oplus C_2$ for suitable submodules $C_1,C_2$ of $M$ (by alternative definition of semisimple module). So you need to show that $C_1 \simeq C_2$. However, consider the decompositions of $K_1,K_2,C_1,C_2$ into direct sums of simple submodules, i. e. say
$$K_1=\bigoplus_{i=1}^{k}S_i, \; K_2=\bigoplus_{i=1}^{k}S'_i, \; C_1=\bigoplus_{j=1}^{m}T_j,\; C_2=\bigoplus_{j=1}^{n}T'_j, $$
where $S_i,S'_i, T_i, T'_i$ are simple submodules of $M$.
Then
$$\bigoplus_{i=1}^{k}S_i\oplus\bigoplus_{j=1}^{m}T_j = M = \bigoplus_{i=1}^{k}S'_i\oplus\bigoplus_{j=1}^{n}T'_j, $$
are two decompositions of $M$ into sum of simple submodules, from which follows (after using the fact, that $K_1 \simeq K_2$ and, basically, Jordan-Holder theorem) that $m=n$ and the summands $T_j, T'_j$ are (in some suitable bijection of indices) isomorphic.