-4

It's a follow up of Does three iteration are sufficient to use Newton's method

Come back on the previous question :

$f(x)=x\left(b_0(1+x)+\frac{b_1}{x+1}+\frac{b_2}{1+\frac{1}{x+1}}+\cdots+\frac{b_{n}}{1+\frac{1}{1+\frac{1}{1+\frac{1}{1+\cdots x}}}}\right)-C=0\tag{I}$

Or:

$x\left(b_{0}\left(x+1\right)+b_{1}\cdot\frac{1}{x+1}+b_{2}\frac{x+1}{x+2}+b_{3}\cdot\frac{x+2}{2x+3}+\cdot\cdot+\frac{b_{n}\left(F_{n-2}x+F_{n-1}\right)}{F_{n-1}x+F_{n}}\right)-C=0$

Where $F_n$ are the Fibonacci's numbers

Now let $b_0\geq 1,C>2$,$b_i\in R$

Using Newton's method on $f(x)$ provided the polynomial (numerator) have only one positive real root over $R^+$

Is the starting value $k>x_{positive-root}$ with the Newton's methods sufficient to ensure the convergence to the positive and unique root ?

Have you a proof or a counterxample ?

1 Answers1

0

Some thoughts:

Using the Kantorovitch's theorem we need to show $x,y,k>0$:

$$|f'(x)-f'(y)|<k|x-y|\tag{I}$$

But by definition of $f(x)$ we have :

$$\lim_{x\to \infty}f'(x)-ax+b=0,a>0$$

So taking $k$ sufficiently large for all $x>M>0$ we have $I$.

If so taking a sufficiently large initial value we have convergence .

Conclusion :

Excluding the too small value invoking divergence we have for sufficiently large one as application of the Kantorovitch's theorem the convergence is reached.

Reference :

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kantorovich_theorem https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.09791 Remark :

@MartinR we need to show that the derivative of $f(x)$ in absolute value doesn't vanish AFTER the positive real root of $f(x)$ for that we need a bound . See Under what conditions a rational function has bounded derivative?

To be continued.

Eurêka as there is only one positive real root we can apply Gauss-Lucas theorem.

And so all the starting value $k>x_{positive-root}$ are OK