0

I am studying the effect on the eigenvalues of a known Laplacian matrix $L$ when the first $p$ rows (wlog the top rows) are set to $0$. For those not familiar with a Laplacian matrix, all you need to know is that it is a symmetric $(n\times n)$-matrix with ordered spectrum $0=\lambda_1<\lambda_2\leq\cdots\leq\lambda_n$. Note that the eigenvalue $\lambda_2$ is positive - we are working with connected graphs.

I define a projection matrix

$$M=\begin{bmatrix}0_{p\times p} & 0_{p\times(n-p)} \\ 0_{(n-p)\times p} & I_{(n-p)\times(n-p)} \end{bmatrix},$$

which is just the identity matrix with the first $p$ ones set to $0$. Left-multiplication by $M$ has the effect of setting the top $p$ rows of $L$ to $0$, or, equivalently, a projection onto the subspace spanned by basis vectors $p+1$ to $n$.

I postulate that for $p\geq 2$, the matrix $ML$ has eigenvalue $0$ with multiplicity $p$. There are $p$ rows of $0$, so the multiplicity is at least $p$, but I'm stuck on proving equality. Does it have to do with the fact that the rest of the matrix is full rank?

Let me show an example, take

$$L = \begin{bmatrix} 2 & -1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \\ -1 & 4 & -1 & 0 & -1 & -1 \\ 0 & -1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 2 & -1 & -1 \\ 0 & -1 & 0 & -1 & 2 & 0 \\ -1 & -1 & 0 & -1 & 0 & 3 \\ \end{bmatrix}$$

which has ordered spectrum $\{0,>0,\cdots, >0\}$. (I don't care what the actual numbers are, just that they are positive/zero)

If $p=1$, I set the first row to $0$, but the spectrum is still $\{0,>0,\cdots, >0\}$. This was a little surprising to me, as I naively expected two $0$'s here, since $0$ was already an eigenvalue, and we in some sense 'added to the nullspace' by setting a row to zero, introducing $0$ as an eigenvalue. What's the intuition behind this?

If $p=2$, I set the first two rows to $0$, and now the spectrum is $\{0, 0, >0, \cdots, >0\}$.

So to summarise:

  1. How to prove that $ML$ has eigenvalue $0$ with multiplicity $p$? I understand why it must be $\geq p$.
  2. The case $p=1$, what's the intuition for having only multiplicity $1$?

I would appreciate any insights or hints into this problem.


Related posts here and here.

Landuros
  • 2,781

1 Answers1

1

Let $ML=\pmatrix{0_{p\times p}&0\\ \ast&A}$. Note that for each connected component in the subgraph consisting of the nodes $p+1,\,p+2,\ldots,n$, the corresponding principal submatrix of $A$ cannot be a Laplacian matrix, otherwise the graph for $L$ is not connected. It follows that $A$, up to a relabelling of rows and columns, is a direct sum of irreducibly diagonally dominant matrices. Hence $A$ is invertible and both the algebraic and geometric multiplicity of the zero eigenvalue of $L$ is $p$.

user1551
  • 139,064
  • I am not super familiar with graph theory. I think I understand the first point: $A$ describes the subgraph with nodes ${p+1,\dots,n}$, and you claim the submatrices describing connected components of the subgraph cannot be Laplacian matrices. If they were then $L$ would be a direct sum of Laplacian matrices and be unconnected. But why does this imply $A$ is a direct sum of irreducibly diagonally dominant matrices? (this is the first time I've come across the term diagonally dominant) / is there a resource you'd recommend I read? – Landuros Jun 28 '23 at 13:13
  • @Landuros Every linear algebra textbook that covers Gerschgorin disc theorem should cover also diagonal dominance. However, irreducibly diagonally dominant matrices are typically discussed only in books that slant towards numerical linear algebra or matrix analysis. I am not sure which introductory texts cover this, but I am sure that it is covered in Matrix Theory: A Second Course by James Ortega and Matrix Analysis by Horn and Johnson. – user1551 Jun 28 '23 at 15:17