Here is the original question:
Suppose we define function $f$ that is measurable in the Caratheodory sense.
Main Question:
Can the pre-image of a non-measurable set under $f$ be measurable in the sense of caratheodory?
Attempt:
I'm not sure how to approach the main question but we will attempt a solution by taking the contrapositive of this question:
Can the image of a measurable set under $f$ be non-measurable?
Due to my lack of formal training beyond Intro to Advanced Math, I couldn't figure out if the contrapositive is true; however, from Royden in Real Analysis, if the Cantor-Lebesgue function is $f$, there exists a measurable subset in the domain of $f$ (i.e. the cantor set) whose image under $f$ is non-measurable.
Is the second question infact the contrapositive of the main question? If not, how do we prove the main question is wrong?
Final Note/Motivation:
I wanted to make sure the main question in this post (specifically criteria 3.) helps to satisfy the motivation of that post.
In other words, I want to find a function $f:[0,1]\to[0,1]$ whose graph is dense, and somewhat but not too evenly distributed, in $[0,1]\times[0,1]$