5

First of all we remember some elementary definitions and results about manifolds and simplexes.

Definition

A function $f$ defined in a subset $S$ of $\Bbb R^k$ is said of class $C^r$ if it can be extended to a function $\phi$ (said $C^r$-extension) that is of class $C^r$ in a open neighborhood of $S$.

Lemma

If $f$ is a function defined in a subset $S$ of $\Bbb R^n$ such that for any $x\in S$ there exists a function $f_x$ defined in a neighborhood of $x$ that is of class $C^r$ and compatible with $f$ on $U_x\cap S$ then $f$ is of class $C^r$.

Lemma

If $U$ is an open set of $H_n:=[0,+\infty)^n$ then the derivatives of two different extensions $\phi$ and $\varphi$ of a $C^r$-function $f$ agree in $U$.

Definition

A $k$-manifold with corners in $\Bbb R^n$ of class $C^r$ is a subspace $M$ of $\Bbb R^n$ whose points have a neighborhood $V$ in $M$ that is the immage of a homeomorphism $\phi$ of calss $C^r$ defined an open set $U$ of $\Bbb R^k$ or of $H_k$ and whose derivative has rank $k$.

Definition

If $x_0,...,x_k$ are $(k+1)$ affinely indipendent points of $\Bbb R^n$ (which means that the vectors $(x_1-x_0),...,(x_k-x_0)$ are linearly independent) then simplex determined by them is the set $$ \mathcal S:=\Biggl\{x\in\Bbb R^n: x=x_0+\alpha^i\vec v_i\,\,\,\text{and}\,\,\, \sum_{i=1}^k\alpha^i\le1\,\,\,\text{and}\,\,\,\alpha^i\ge0\,\,\,\text{for all}\,i=1,\dots,k\Biggl\} $$ where $\vec v_i:=(x_i-x_0)$ for each $i=1,\dots,k$.

With the previous definition we let try to prove that any simplex is a $k$-manifold with corners. First of all we define the function $f$ from $\Bbb R^k$ to $\Bbb R^n$ by putting $$ f(x):=x_0+x^1\vec v_1+\dots+x^k\vec v_k $$ for each $x\in\Bbb R^k$ and thus we observe that it is a smooth homeomorphism because it is the composition of a translation with a linear and injective map betweeen finite dimensional topological vector spaces -for details about this statement we refer to to the text Functional Analysis of Walter Rudin. So if we show that $f^{-1}[S]$ is a manifold with corners then the statement follows immediately. Then we observe that $$ f^{-1}[\mathcal S]=\Big\{x\in\Bbb R^k:x^1+\dots+x^k\le 1\,\,\,\text{and}\,\,\,x^i\ge0\,\,\,\text{for all}\,\,\,i=1,\dots,k\Big\} $$ and thus we conclude that the set $f^{-1}[\mathcal S]$ is the standard $k$-simplex $\mathcal E_k$ generated by the point $O,O+\hat e_1,\dots,O+\hat e_k$ which (if this can interest) is equal to the intersection of a $k$ parallelotopes $\mathcal P_1,\dots,\mathcal P_k$ with the not negative space $H^k_k$ due to analogous arguments here advanced. Now we find a coordinate patch about any point $x$ of $\mathcal E_k$ and we are doing this assuming that it is $$ x^1+\dots+x^k\lneq 1\,\,\,\,\,\,\text{or either}\,\,\,x^1+\dots+x^k=1 $$ Now the function scalar $g$ defined in $\Bbb R^k$ through the equation $$ g(x):=x^1+\dots+x^k $$ for any $x\in\Bbb R^k$ is trivially continuous (indeed it is a liner map between finite dimensional topological vector spaces or alternatively is finite sum of continuous functions) so that the set $g^{-1}\big[(0,1)\big]$ is open and thus observing that $$ g^{-1}\big[(0,1)\big]\cap\mathcal E_k=\big\{x\in\Bbb R^k:0\lneq x^1+\dots+x^k\lneq 1\big\}\cap\big\{x\in\Bbb R^k:x^1+\dots+x^k\le 1\,\,\,\text{and}\,\,\,x^i\ge0\,\,\,\text{for all}\,\,\,i=1,\dots,k\big\}=\\ \big\{x\in\Bbb R^k:0\lneq x^1+\dots+x^k\lneq 1\big\}\cap\big\{x\in\Bbb R^k:x^i\ge0\,\,\,\text{for all}\,\,\,i=1,\dots,k\big\}=g^{-1}\big[(0,1)\big]\cap H^k_k $$ we conclude that the restriction of the identity map to the set $g^{-1}\big[(0,1)\big]\cap H^k_k$ is a coordinate patch about $x$ in an open set of the not negative space $H^k_k$ when in the first case it is $$ x^1+\dots+x^k\neq 0 $$ too. Otherwise $\mathcal E_k$ is contained into the not negative space $H^k_k$ so that if $x\in\mathcal E_k$ is such that $$ x^1+\dots+x^k=0 $$ then $x$ is just the origin $O$ and thus if we find an open cube centered at $O$ whose intersection with $H^k_k$ is contained in $\mathcal E_k$ then the restriction of the identity map to the intersection between $H^k_k$ and this open cube is a coordinate patch about $O$ defined in an open set of $H^k_k$. So observing that if $x$ is an element lying in the intersection between $H^k_k$ and the open cube $C\Big(O,\frac1k\Big)$ centered at $O$ and of radius $\frac1k$ then $$ x^1+\dots+x^k\le k\cdot\max\big\{|x^i|:i=1,\dots,k\big\}=k\cdot\| x-O\|_\infty<k\cdot\frac1 k=1 $$ so that the statement follows immediately. Now we have to find a coordinate patch supposing that $x$ is an element of $\mathcal E_k$ such that $$ x^1+\dots+x^k=1 $$ but unfortuantely I have some difficulties and thus I ask to do it. Could someone help me, please?

$$ \underline{\text{**ACHTUNG**}} $$

Courteously I ask not to prove the statement by showing that the simplex $\mathcal E_k$ is a trasversal intersection between manifolds with corners because I studied trasversality ONLY for manifold WITHOUT boundary and unfortunately I did NOT REALLY understand the proof of trasversality theorems for manifold with corners: moreover I have to prove the result for pratical purposes (I am studying Continuum Mechanics) and thus I really need to find a coordinate patch about the points of the obliqual face of $\mathcal E_k$, that's all. Thanks for your attention if you have read what is written above.

  • 4
    Please, include your definition of a manifold with corners. I know one, but your definition might be different from mine. In particular, my definition has nothing to do with parallelotopes. – Moishe Kohan Jul 25 '21 at 23:00
  • @MoisheKohan Look here while I edit the question. – Antonio Maria Di Mauro Jul 26 '21 at 07:45
  • @MoisheKohan I edited the question adding some details about Manifolds with corners and adding another piece at the end about the question solving mode and it seems I am really sure that the solution is nearly to cames. So what can you say now? – Antonio Maria Di Mauro Jul 26 '21 at 08:31
  • @MoisheKohan Perhaps I found an answer as you can see below: so what can you say about it? – Antonio Maria Di Mauro Jul 27 '21 at 20:19
  • I do not understand your definition (it is different from mine which is in terms of an abstract topological space and a certain atlas, just like the the definition of a smooth manifold). In particular, I do not understand what do you mean by this (quotient space?) $H^k_1/H^k_m$. – Moishe Kohan Jul 27 '21 at 20:44
  • @MoisheKohan Oh, forgive this bad notation: I just edited the question. Anyway if you do not really understand my definition you can read it on the text Analysis on Manifolds of James Munkres where it is effectively given only for manifolds with boundary (m=1) but it is can be easly generalised. – Antonio Maria Di Mauro Jul 27 '21 at 20:58
  • 2
    @AntonioMariaDiMauro: Do you have the publisher's permission to post Munkres's book online? The copyright page says "No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher." – Jack Lee Jul 28 '21 at 21:15
  • @JackLee Oh sorry, I posted it because the user Moishe Kohan did not understand what I was talking about poperly and I thought that sending him the source was making it way clearer so that he can help me. Anyway I deleded the post, sorry. – Antonio Maria Di Mauro Jul 28 '21 at 21:59
  • It's now the 21st edit (and the 13th edits of the answer). Please refrain from doing minor edits, this bumps the post to the front page... – Arctic Char Jul 30 '21 at 09:18
  • @ArcticChar Oh sorry! I will not edit the question or answer anymore: so if there are any typos I hope someone corrects them. Sorry a lot. – Antonio Maria Di Mauro Jul 30 '21 at 09:26
  • @ArcticChar Hi unfortunately I have noticed that I did not prove that the set $\varphi\big [,\overset {\circ} {\mathcal F} ,\big] $ is open in $ \mathcal E$ and this makes the proof surely incomplete and so I must necessarily edit the answer. Sorry if this bothers. – Antonio Maria Di Mauro Aug 01 '21 at 13:31
  • What does $H_k^k$ denote? Is it the same as the $H_k$? – P.Jo Sep 21 '23 at 09:20
  • @P.Jo I wrote it into the answer: it is the not negative space -of $\mathbb R^k$. – Antonio Maria Di Mauro Sep 21 '23 at 10:36

1 Answers1

1

Above we showed that the subset $\overset{\circ}{\mathcal E}_k$ of $\mathcal E_k$ whose elements have value in $[0,1)$ with respect the scalar function $g$ is open in $H^k_k$ since it is union of the sets $$ g^{-1}\big[\,(0,1)\,\big]\cap H^k_k\,\,\,\text{and}\,\,\,C\Big(O,\frac 1k\Big)\cap H^k_k $$ that are open in $H^k_k$. Now provided that $$ \xi^1+\dots+\xi^k=1 $$ for any $\xi\in\mathcal E_k$ then surely it must be $$ \xi^j\gneq0 $$ for any $j=1,\dots,k$ and in particular for now we assume that this happens for the last coordiante. So in this case we define the map $\varphi$ from $\Bbb R^k$ into $\Bbb R^k$ through the equation $$ \varphi(x):=\big(x^1,\dots,x^{k-1},1-(x^1+\dots+x^{k-1}+x^k)\big) $$ for any $x\in\Bbb R^k$ and thus we are going to prove that this map can be restricted to a coordinate patch about $\xi\in\mathcal E_k$ whose last coordinate is not zero, i.e. we let to prove that the restriction $\phi$ of $\varphi$ at the set $\overset{\circ}{\mathcal E}_k$ is the researched coordinate patch. First of all we observe that $\varphi$ is a diffeomorphism of $\Bbb R^k$ onto $\Bbb R^k$ being an affine map, i.e. it is compostion of a translation with a linear map between finite dimensional topological vector spaces and both these maps are diffeomorphism. So if we prove that $\varphi$ maps $\overset{\circ}{\mathcal E}_k$ into an open set of $\mathcal E_k$ containing $\xi$ then we will proved that $\varphi$ is a coordinate patch about $\xi$ so that we let to do this. Now if $x$ is an elemen of $\overset{\circ}{\mathcal F}$ then it must be $$ x^i\in[0,1) $$ for each $i=1,\dots,k$ since otherwise it would be $$ x^1+\dots+x^{i-1}+1+x^{i+1}+\dots+x^k\le x^1+\dots+x^{i-1}+x^i+x^{i+1}+\dots+x^k<1\Rightarrow\\ x^1+\dots+x^{i-1}+x^{i+1}+\dots+x^k<0 $$ that is impossible if $x$ lies in $\overset{\circ}{\mathcal E_k}$ and thus in $H^k_k$ and so we can conclude that $$ x\in\overset{\circ}{\mathcal E}_k\Rightarrow x\in[0,1)^k\wedge x^1+\dots+x^k\lneq1\Rightarrow\\\varphi(x)\in H^k_k\wedge\varphi^1(x)+\dots+\varphi^k(x)\le1\Rightarrow\varphi(x)\in\mathcal E_k $$ and this proves that $\varphi$ maps $\overset{\circ}{\mathcal E}_k$ into $\mathcal E_k$. So if the last coordinate of $\xi$ is not zero and the others are not negative then surely $$ g(\xi^1,\dots,\xi^{k-1},0)\ge0\,\,\,\text{and}\,\,\,g(\xi^1,\dots,\xi^{k-1},0)=\xi^1+\dots+\xi^{k-1}<\xi^1+\dots+\xi^{k-1}+\xi^k=1 $$ so that $(\xi^1,\dots,\xi^{k-1},0)$ is an element of $\overset{\circ}{\mathcal E}_k$ and in particular it is such that $$ \varphi(\xi^1,\dots,\xi^{k-1},0)=\big(\xi^1,\dots,\xi^{k-1},1-(\xi^1+\dots+\xi^{k-1})\big)=\big(\xi^1,\dots,\xi^{k-1},\xi^k\big)=\xi $$ and thus it is proved that $\xi$ is an element of $\varphi\big[\,\overset{\circ}{\mathcal E}_k\,\big]$. Now we previously define the set $$ \tilde{\mathcal E}_k:=\{x\in\mathcal E_k:x^k\neq 0\} $$ and thus we let prove that $\varphi$ carries $\overset{\circ}{\mathcal E}_k$ onto $\tilde{\mathcal E}_k$. So we first observe that $$ x\in\overset{\circ}{\mathcal E}_k\Rightarrow 0\le g(x)\lneq1\Rightarrow0\lneq1-g(x)\le1\Rightarrow\varphi^k(x)>0\Rightarrow\varphi(x)\in\tilde{\mathcal E}_k $$ and so we conclude that $$ \varphi\big[\,\overset{\circ}{\mathcal E}_k\,\big]\subseteq\tilde{\mathcal E}_k $$ so that we let to prove the opposite inclusion. Now for any element $\xi$ of $\tilde{\mathcal E}_k$ it must be $$ g(\xi)=1\,\,\,\text{or either}\,\,\,g(\xi)<1 $$ but effectively we just proved above that if $g(\xi)=1$ and $\xi^k>0$ then surely $$ \xi=\varphi(x) $$ for any $x\in\overset{\circ}{\mathcal E}$ so that to follow we are supposing that $g(\xi)$ is strictly less than $1$. So we observe that $$ \begin{cases}\xi\in\tilde{\mathcal E}_k\\ g(\xi)\lneq1\end{cases}\Rightarrow \begin{cases}\xi^i\ge0\,\,\,\forall\,i=1,\dots,(k-1)\\\xi^k\gneq0\\ \xi^1+\dots+\xi^{k-1}+\xi^k\lneq1\end{cases}\Rightarrow\\ \begin{cases}\xi^i\ge0\,\,\,\forall\,i=1,\dots,(k-1)\\0\lneq\xi^k\lneq1\\ 0\lneq1-(\xi^1+\dots+\xi^{k-1}+\xi^k)\lneq1\end{cases}\Rightarrow \begin{cases}\xi^i\ge0\,\,\,\forall\,i=1,\dots,(k-1)\\0\lneq1-\xi^k\lneq1\\ 0\lneq1-(\xi^1+\dots+\xi^{k-1}+\xi^k)\lneq1\end{cases}\Rightarrow \begin{cases}\xi^i\ge0\,\,\,\forall\,i=1,\dots,(k-1)\\ 1-(\xi^1+\dots+\xi^{k-1}+\xi^k)\gneq0\\ 0\lneq\xi^1+\dots+\xi^{k-1}+\big(1-(\xi^1+\dots+\xi^{k-1}+\xi^k)\big)\lneq1\end{cases} $$ and thus we conclude that $\big(\xi^1,\dots,\xi^{k-1},1-(\xi^1+\dots+\xi^{k-1}+\xi^k)\big)$ is an element of $\overset{\circ}{\mathcal E}_k$ and so observing that $$ \varphi\big(\xi^1,\dots,\xi^{k-1},1-(\xi^1+\dots+\xi^{k-1}+\xi^k)\biggl)=\\ \biggl(\xi^1,\dots,\xi^{k-1},1-\Big(\xi^1+\dots+\xi^{k-1}+\big(1-(\xi^1+\dots+\xi^{k-1}+\xi^k)\big)\Big)\biggl)=\\ \Biggl(\xi^1,\dots,\xi^{k-1},1-\Big((\xi^1+\dots+\xi^{k-1})+1-(\xi^1+\dots+\xi^{k-1})-\xi^k\Big)\Biggl)=\\ \big(\xi^1,\dots,\xi^{k-1},1-(1-\xi^k)\big)=(\xi^1,\dots,\xi^{k-1},\xi^k)=\xi$$ we conclude that $\varphi$ maps $\overset{\circ}{\mathcal E}_k$ onto $\tilde{\mathcal E}_k$. So we let to prove that $\tilde{\mathcal E}_k$ is open in $\mathcal E_k$ and we are doing this proving that the set $\mathcal E_k\setminus\tilde{\mathcal E}_k$ is closed in $\mathcal E_k$, that is it is the intersection of a closed set of $\Bbb R^k$ with $\mathcal E_k$. Now we remember that any symplex is closed (see here for details) so that the $(k-1)$ standard simplex $\mathcal E_{k-1}$ is closed: so observing that $$ \mathcal E_k\setminus\tilde{\mathcal E}_k=\{x\in\mathcal E_k:x^k=0\}=\\ \{x\in\Bbb R^k:x^1+\dots x^{k-1}\le1\wedge x^i\ge0,\,\forall\,i=1,\dots,(k-1)\wedge x^k=0\}=\\ \{x\in\Bbb R^{k-1}:x^1+\dots+x^{k-1}\le1\wedge x^i\,\forall\,i=1,\dots,(k-1)\ge0\}\times\{0\}=\mathcal E_{k-1}\times\{0\} $$ we conclude that $\mathcal E_k\setminus\tilde{\mathcal E}_k$ is closed in $\Bbb R^k$ (ideed it is product of closed set) and so $\mathcal E_k$ too. So we proved the existence of a coordinate patch when the last coordinate of $\xi$ is not zero. Otherwise if the last coordinate of $\xi$ is zero then surely (remember what observed above) there must exist $j=1,\dots,k-1$ such that $$ \xi^j\neq0 $$ so that let be $\psi$ the diffeormosphism of $\Bbb R^k$ onto $\Bbb R^k$ that interchanges the $j$-th coordinate with the last, i.e. $$ [\psi(x)](i):=\begin{cases}x^k,\,\,\,\text{if}\,\,\,i=j\\ x^j,\,\,\,\text{if}\,\,\,i=k\\ x^i\,\,\,\text{otherwise}\end{cases} $$ for any $x\in\Bbb R^k$. Now $\psi$ is an involution that maps $\mathcal E_k$ onto $\mathcal E_k$ and in particular if the last coordinate of $\xi$ is zero then this does not happen for $\psi^{-1}(\xi)$ so that if $\varphi$ is a coordinate patch about $\psi^{-1}(\xi)$ then the composition $\psi\circ\varphi$ of $\psi$ with $\varphi$ is just a coordinate patch about $\xi$ and so the statement finally holds.

  • 2
    A much easier approach is to notice that for any $i\in {1,\dots,n}$, there is an invertible affine map (hence a diffeomorphism) of $\mathbb R^n$ that takes the standard simplex to itself and takes $e_i$ to the origin. Then you can apply the argument in your original post. – Jack Lee Jul 28 '21 at 21:33
  • 1
    @JackLee Oh yeah, I understand what you mean. Anyway thanks very much for your assistance: you was really kind with me, thanks yet. – Antonio Maria Di Mauro Jul 28 '21 at 22:03