2

Would this proof work to show that $R$ ={(x, y) ∈ ℤ2: x + 2y ≡3 0} is an equivalence relation?

Reflexive:

Let x ∈ ℤ. x + 2x= 3x, and 3x ≡ 0 mod 3 since 3 divides 3x with remainder 0.

Symmetric:

Let x, y ∈ ℤ. Suppose (x, y) ∈ $R$. Then x + 2y ≡ 0 mod 3 -> x ≡ -2y ≡ y ≡ 2x -> y + 2x ≡ 0 mod 3.

Transitive:

Edit: Oops definitely did not do the transitive part of the proof properly -- does this work instead?

Let x, y, z ∈ ℤ and suppose (x, y), (y, z) ∈ $R$. Then x + 2y ≡ y+ 2z ≡ 0 mod 3. x + 2y = 3m and y + 2z = 3n for some m, n in ℤ. Then x + 2(3n-2z) = 3m, so simplifying that shows x + 6n - 4c = 3n...? Not sure how to get the sign for c to be positive.

1 Answers1

1

For proving that the relation is transitive, $$ a+2b = 3m ~~~;a,b,m \in \mathbb{Z}$$ $$ b+2c = 3n ~~~;c, n \in \mathbb{Z}$$ Add both the equations, $$a+3b+2c=3(m+n) $$ $$ \implies a+2c=3(m+n-b)$$ $$ \implies a+2c \equiv 0 \pmod{3}$$

Ankit Saha
  • 1,742