2

This is my first post here so I apologize if there is anything wrong with it. If so, please let me know and I can edit the post.

I just tried to solve the following question:

Problem 2.

  1. Give the explicit solution for all $t\leqslant 1/2$, to the following equation: $$ \left\lbrace\begin{aligned} &u_t+f(u)_x=0,\\ &u(x,0)=\begin{cases} 1, & x\leqslant 1\\ 1/2, &1<x\leqslant 3\\ 3/2, &x>3 \end{cases} \end{aligned}\right. $$ where $f(u)=4u(2-u)$.
  2. Represent the solution at times $t=0$, $t=1/4$ and $t=1/2$.
  3. Determine the solution beyond $t=1/2$?

What I have so far:

  • $f'(u) = 8 - 8u$, and for a solution $u(x,t), u$ is constant along the characteristic curves defined by $x'(t) = 8 - 8u, x(0) = a$ ($a$ real number), ie $u(x(t), t) = u(x(0), 0) = u(a, 0)$.
  • Then $u$ does not depend on $t$, so the characteristic curves are $x(t) = (8 - 8\cdot u(a,0)) \cdot t + a$.
  • ie $x(t)$ is given by $$\begin{cases} 0t + a & \text{if $a<=1$} \\ 4t + a & \text{if $1 <= a <= 3$} \\ -4t + a & \text{if $a>3$} \end{cases}$$

The question asks for the solution before $t = 1/2$, however I'm struggling with the following:

  1. Based on the above, it seems the characteristic curves already intersect at $t = 0$ (and $x = 3$), long before $t = 1/2$. Am I supposed to construct a shock wave solution using the Rankine-Hugoniot jump condition? I actually think there may be 2 shock wave solutions needed, because the characteristic curves do not cover a space around $(1, 0)$, it seems, since the curve $x = -4t + 3$ intersects the t-axis at $t=4/3$... However if I do this, wouldn't it be a solution for some range of t that isn't $t \leq 1/2$?
  2. On the other hand, is my reasoning above (before bullet #1) correct? This is, I think, analogous to what I have seen in class and in some other resources I looked at, however they all used the function $f(u) = u^{2} / 2$ and while I don't think this would change much, maybe I'm missing something vital.

Thank you in advance for any help.

EditPiAf
  • 20,898
bosco98
  • 67

1 Answers1

2

The situation is very similar to this post and related ones, where piecewise constant initial data is considered (i.e, a series of Riemann problems).

  • At $x=1$, we have the characteristic speeds $f'(1) = 0$ on the left side and $f'(1/2) = 4$ on the right side of the discontinuity. Since the right slope $4>0$ is larger than that on the left, characteristic lines separate: a rarefaction wave forms over $1\leq x\leq 1+4t$, with a linear fan solution.
  • At $x=3$, we have the characteristic speeds $f'(1/2) = 4$ on the left side and $f'(3/2) = -4$ on the right side of the discontinuity. Since the right slope $-4<4$ is smaller than that on the left, characteristic lines intersect: a shock wave forms, which speed $s=0$ follows from the Rankine-Hugoniot condition (it's a static shock located at $x=3$).
  • These two waves interact at the time $t^*$ such that $1+4t^* = 3$, i.e $t^*=1/2$. Thus, one may distinguish the case $t<1/2$ from the case $t\geq 1/2$ (cf. linked post).

To link with the Burgers equation, one may consider the change of variable $v=8(1-u)$ such that $$ v_t + (\tfrac12 v^2)_x = 0\, , $$ $$ v(x,0) = \begin{cases} 0, & x\leq 1\\ 4, & 1<x\leq 3\\ -4, & x>3 \end{cases} $$

EditPiAf
  • 20,898
  • 1
    Hi, thank you, I really appreciate the answer and have accepted it. We were told in class that if there is a region with no characteristic lines, the solution in that region should be a rarefaction wave. This agrees with what you wrote, I believe -- a rarefaction wave solution between x = 1 and x = 1 + 4t (for t <= 1/2). However, isn't there an area within that region where there are characteristic lines, namely 1/4 < t < 1/2 and 3 - 4t < x < 1 + 4t (corresponding to characteristics with slope -4 in the x-t plane)? I'm having an issue reconciling this. – bosco98 Feb 26 '21 at 20:00
  • @bosco98 One should not merge the characteristic curve and the base characteristics concepts. The first denotes curves of the coordinates space along which the value of the solution is known. The second is a sub-family of characteristic curves deduced from the initial/boundary data. Hence, the rarefaction wave between $x=1$ and $x=1+4t$ includes characteristic curves (cf. linked post), but no base characteristics. – EditPiAf Feb 27 '21 at 12:34
  • I think I understand. Basically, if two characteristic curves cross at some value $t^{}$, then for any $t > t^{}$, along either characteristic curve, we do not anymore know the value of the solution, because the solution must be constant along a characteristic, and it would be ambiguous as to which value the solution would take. – bosco98 Feb 27 '21 at 15:45
  • @bosco98 Exactly! That's why we then introduce weak solutions such as shock waves to overcome this paradox. – EditPiAf Feb 27 '21 at 17:09