Given a non-scalar matrix $A$ in size $n\times n$ over $\mathbb{R}$ that maintains the following equation $$A^2 + 2A = 3I$$ given matrix $B$ in size $n\times n$ too $$B = A^2 + A- 6I$$ Is $B$ an invertible matrix?
3 Answers
An alternative version to the other excellent answers by Quark and user1551.
Note first, as the others did, that $(A + 3 I) (A - I) = 0$, and $B = (A - 2 I)(A + 3 I)$.
Then $$ B (A - I) = 0. $$ So if $A \ne I$, then $B$ is definitely not invertible.
If $A = I$, as noted by Quark, then $B = -4 I$ is invertible.
But Tharsis (thanks!) made me notice that $A$ is non-scalar by assumption, so the case $A = I$ is excluded (although easy to deal with).

- 68,873
-
1It is required that $A$ be non-scalar, so $A \ne I$ and $B$ is not invertible. – Librecoin May 09 '13 at 10:53
-
@Tharsis, oh, thanks, I had not noticed that, will fix. – Andreas Caranti May 09 '13 at 10:56
-
hi,thanks for your response. do you mean that $B = $0 (the zero matrix)? – Idan May 09 '13 at 13:21
-
@idannik, you're welcome. No, I mean non-invertible, as $B$ invertibile and $B (A - I) = 0$ would imply $A - I = 0$. – Andreas Caranti May 09 '13 at 13:29
-
thanks again for your explanation . you have helped me. have a nice day mate! – Idan May 09 '13 at 13:44
-
I like this unconventional proof! +1 – user1551 May 10 '13 at 04:58
It depends, If you factorize the first equation you get, $$(A-I)*(A+3I)=0$$
This implies$\; \det(A-I)\;\; or\;\; \det(A-3I)\;$ must be zero.
Now factorizing B gives you (A-2I)*(A+3I)
So $\det(B) = \det(A-2I)*\det(A+3I)$
If $\det(A-3I)$ is zero from the first condition, then $\det(B)$ is also zero, so B is not invertible.
But, if $\det(A-I)$ is zero and not $\det(A-3I)$, I don't think anything can be said
(not very sure, but I can give a example: If you take A=I, the first equation is satisfied, and B comes out to be -4I which is invertible...)

- 1,021
-
Please check your LaTeX to write properly mathematics in this site, in the FAQ section. Also, $,A=I,$ is not an option by assumption... – DonAntonio May 09 '13 at 09:13
-
Hint: The first equation implies that $A^2+2A-3I=(A-I)(A+3I)=0$. Hence the minimal polynomial $m_A(x)$ of $A$ divides $(x-1)(x+3)$. What happens if $x+3$ is not a factor of $m_A(x)$?

- 139,064
-
-
@idannik If $x+3$ is not a factor of the minimal polynomial of $A$ (I hope you have learnt what a minimal polynomial is), then the minimal polynomial must be equal to $x-1$, which means $A=I$, which contradicts our assumption. Therefore $x+3$ must be a factor of the minimal polynomial, i.e. $A+3I$ is singular. But then $B$ is singular too. – user1551 May 10 '13 at 08:20
-