In propositional logic, a formula $F$ is satisfiable when there is a valuation (or : truth-assignment) $v$ such that $v(F)=$ t (in first-order logic : when there is an interpretation that makes the formula true).
This does not implies that its negation is unsatisfiable.
Consider the simple example of a formula $F := p$, where $p$ is a sentential letter.
Clearly $F$ is sat, and also $\lnot F$ is sat.
But there are many more : $p \lor q, p \to q, p \land q, \ldots$
The interesting relation is :
if a formula $F$ is unsatisfiable, then $\lnot F$ is a tautology (i.e. always true).