3

EDİTED:

I want to ask MSE to confirm the correctness of the alternate solution and its mistake.

My previous attempt was wrong,That's why I made a new initiative.

Using the definition of the derivative I wanted to find the derivative of the function $f(x)=a^x$.

Here $a≠0,a\in \mathbb{R^{+}}$ and $a^x=e^{x \ln a}$

I wrote these:

$(a^x)'=\lim_{\delta x\to 0}\frac{a^{x+\delta x}-a^x}{\delta x}=a^x×\lim_{\delta x\to 0}\frac {a^{\delta x}-1}{\delta x}$

Now,I must find $\lim_{\delta x\to 0}\frac {a^{\delta x}-1}{\delta x}$

I tried to do something:

$$a^{\frac{\delta x}{a^{\delta x}-1}}=\left(1+\left(a^{\delta x}-1\right)\right)^{\frac{1}{a^{\delta x}-1}}$$

$$\lim_{\delta x \to 0} {a^{{\frac {\delta x}{a^{\delta x}-1}}}}=\lim_{\delta x \to 0} {{\left(1+\left(a^{\delta x}-1\right)\right)^{\frac{1}{a^{\delta x}-1}}}}$$

$$a^{\lim_{\delta x\to 0}{{{\frac {\delta x}{a^{\delta x}-1}}}}}=\lim_{\delta x \to 0} {{\left(1+\left(a^{\delta x}-1\right)\right)^{\frac{1}{a^{\delta x}-1}}}}$$

$$a^{\lim_{\delta x\to 0}{{{\frac {\delta x}{a^{\delta x}-1}}}}}=e$$

$$\lim_{\delta x\to 0}{{{\frac {\delta x}{a^{\delta x}-1}}}}=\log_a{e}$$

$$\frac{1}{\lim_{\delta x\to 0}{{{\frac {\delta x}{a^{\delta x}-1}}}}}=\frac{1}{\log_a{e}},\log_a{e}≠0$$

$$\lim_{\delta x\to 0} \frac {1}{ \frac{\delta x}{a^{\delta x}-1}}=\ln a$$

$$\lim_{\delta x\to 0}\frac {a^{\delta x}-1}{\delta x}=\ln a$$

I used:

  • $\lim_{n\to 0}{n}=\lim_{\delta x\to 0}{(a^{\delta x}-1)}=a^0-1=0$

  • $\lim_{\delta x \to 0} {{\left(1+\left(a^{\delta x}-1\right)\right)^{\frac{1}{a^{\delta x}-1}}}}=\lim_{n\to 0}{(1+n)^{\frac 1n}}=e$

Finally,

$$(a^x)'=\lim_{\delta x\to 0}\frac{a^{x+\delta x}-a^x}{\delta x}=a^x×\lim_{\delta x\to 0}\frac {a^{\delta x}-1}{\delta x}=a^x \ln a$$

Is this method/way/solution correct?

Thank you!

MathLover
  • 429

7 Answers7

6

There are some subtleties here.

  1. How is $a^x$ defined, for a generic $a>0$ and some $x\in\mathbb{R}$? The most common ways are to define $a^x$ directly as $\exp\left(x\log a\right)$, or to consider a sequence of rational numbers $\left\{\frac{p_n}{q_n}\right\}_{n\geq 0}$ convergent to $x$ and let $a^x=\lim_{n\to +\infty}a^{\frac{p_n}{q_n}}$ ;

  2. If we have $\lim_{n\to +\infty}f(n)=L$ (limit of a sequence) it is not granted that $\lim_{x\to +\infty} f(x)=L$ (limit of a function) without further assumptions on $f$. For instance $\lim_{n\to +\infty}\sin(\pi n)=0$ but $\lim_{x\to +\infty}\sin(\pi x)$ does not exist, so we have to be careful in deriving $\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{a^x-1}{x}=\log a$ from $\lim_{n\to +\infty}\frac{a^{1/n}-1}{1/n}=\log a$;

  3. On the other hand, there is no need to over-complicate things: $\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{a^x-1}{x}$ is just the value of the derivative of $a^x$ at the origin. If we know/prove that $a^x=\exp\left(x\log a\right)$, then $\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{a^x-1}{x}=\log a$ is a straightforward consequence of the chain rule, given the differentiability of the exponential function.

Jack D'Aurizio
  • 353,855
4

User Jack D'Aurizio has raised some good points in his answer and I want to add some remarks in that direction. So this is not exactly an answer but more of a comment which does not fit in comment box.


For most students the first encounter with exponential and logarithmic functions is not a very fascinating one. They are presented with lots of nice (and even strange) properties of these functions and usually the definitions and proofs are absent. Armed with this information the student simply can not evaluate limits as the one in question and needless to say the proof / solution is incorrect.

Textbook authors should be more forthcoming and intellectually honest to say that a proper theory of these functions can not be provided at this stage and the properties of these functions have to be assumed (translate: mugged up) without any proof whatsoever. And they should not give exercises to prove these properties rather the exercises should use these assumed properties to handle more challenging problems. Thus the current question is pointless unless the proper theory of these functions has been developed.

Instead of asking "Evaluate $\lim\limits_{x\to 0}\dfrac{a^x-1}{x}$" it is better to give the following exercise :

Evaluate the limit $\lim\limits_{x\to 0}\dfrac{2^x+3^x-2}{x}$. You may use the limit formula $\lim\limits_{x\to 0}\dfrac{a^x-1}{x}=\log a$ and properties of logarithms.


Update: I decided to answer your question in simple English. Your approach has the following issues:

  • no definition of $a^x$ is provided.
  • you need to show that $\lim\limits_{\delta x\to 0}a^{\delta x} =1$
  • you need to define $e$ and show that $\lim\limits_{\delta x\to 0}(1+\delta x) ^{1/\delta x} = e$.
  • you need to also define $\log a$.

Fixing all the above issues is difficult. Some of these problems have been fixed. See below.

Further Update: the question has been edited to include some definitions (like for $a^x$) and some assumptions about $e$ and logarithmic function have been used. With these assumptions one can say that your approach is correct.

Also OP has raised a concern in comments: does one need to prove each and every theorem being used in order to solve a problem? NO!! But only when the theorem is well known and supposed to be considered basic. If one is trying to prove the basic results then one has to be extra cautious and mention the definitions and prove the basic results using those definitions. For example, one can use L'Hospital's Rule to evaluate a limit, but when one has to prove L'Hospital's Rule, it is necessary to go deeper and start with mean value theorems.

  • @MathLover: your method is not rigorous / wrong. But it is not your fault. Your textbook does not tell you the right method to handle such problems. I hope you can understand this comment. – Paramanand Singh Mar 06 '18 at 09:26
  • @MathLover: the correct answer to your problem is difficult and it is best to assume the limit as $\ln a$ without proof. – Paramanand Singh Mar 06 '18 at 09:29
  • @MathLover: if you want to learn the correct method you may read this blog post. It is somewhat difficult both because of math and English, but may try to read it. – Paramanand Singh Mar 06 '18 at 10:12
  • 1
    This is the first time I have received such downvotes and also a delete vote (without any comment). I am flagging for moderator attention. – Paramanand Singh Mar 08 '18 at 18:05
  • Just for everyone to note. The asker improved his question based on points raised in this answer and my comments to his question and discussion in chat. In particular a definition of $a^x$ has been added in the question based on such feedback (and asker acknowledges this). And some assumptions have also been mentioned by asker (again based on my feedback). So I don't consider this answer and my inputs via comments/chat as unhelpful. – Paramanand Singh Mar 08 '18 at 18:27
  • Can you explain me, what is meaning ? You need a define $e$ and show that $\lim\limits_{\delta x\to 0}(1+\delta x) ^{1/\delta x} = e$.
    • you need to also define $\log a$.

    Fixing all the above issues is difficult.

    – MathLover Mar 08 '18 at 18:48
  • @MathLover : what is the definition of the number $e$? And also what is the definition of $\log a$ or $\ln a$? – Paramanand Singh Mar 08 '18 at 18:56
  • We already know that. Also, I did not define the number $e$. For example, Do you prove every time you apply l'hopital rule? – MathLover Mar 08 '18 at 19:03
  • @MathLover : no but then we assume assume the limit $\lim_{\delta x\to 0}(a^{\delta x} - 1)/\delta x=\ln a$. If you want to evaluate his limit then you need to define many things (which I have mentioned), otherwise just assume it. The problem here that there there are multiple definitions of these things and one must clarify what definition is being used to prove. When you say L'Hospital's Rule, everyone knows what is this rule, but it not the same with the definition of $a^x, \log a, e, e^x$. Continued in next comment. – Paramanand Singh Mar 08 '18 at 19:08
  • @MathLover : Either you assume the basic properties of these functions or you have to mention all the definitions and prove the desired result. It is better that you assume the limit in your question instead of evaluating it. – Paramanand Singh Mar 08 '18 at 19:10
  • @MathLover : I have seen your last edited question. You have mentioned the definition and also some assumptions. Based on that your approach is correct. I will update my answer and mention this. – Paramanand Singh Mar 08 '18 at 19:11
  • 1
    @MathLover : well that comment is now outdated and I will delete it. I don't mean to discourage you. I hope you will learn such topics in very near future. – Paramanand Singh Mar 08 '18 at 19:30
  • Why all these downvotes here? – user Mar 08 '18 at 19:36
  • @gimusi : don't worry :) Such things do happen. Moderators will handle the problem if there is any targeted downvoting. – Paramanand Singh Mar 08 '18 at 19:39
  • @Paramanand Singh I understand that my approach is still insufficient. Because you described it as assumptions . But you know you can improve the approach to the question if you like. Truly grateful. It is a great pleasure to learn my mistakes and deficiencies. – MathLover Mar 08 '18 at 20:09
  • 1
    @MathLover : don't worry. When I was learning these things as a student I faced similar problems. I suggest you read the book A Course of Pure Mathematics by G H Hardy. It is one of the best books for calculus which helped me a lot. But you will need to improve your English also to read it because it uses lot of English instead of math symbols. – Paramanand Singh Mar 08 '18 at 20:14
  • @MathLover Good choice! Paramanand is of course one of the personfrom which you can learn a lot here! – user Mar 08 '18 at 20:22
  • @gimusi I am not even sure that there is 1 person in my country who is reading that book. I will try. English is my second language. This is a main problem now. – MathLover Mar 08 '18 at 20:28
  • @MathLover where are you from? – user Mar 08 '18 at 20:30
  • @MathLover Yes it is, of course! But please delete this information, I prefer to do not give all information here on MSE. – user Mar 08 '18 at 20:52
  • @MathLover: you don't need to buy that book from any shop. It is available online free. Search in Google. – Paramanand Singh Mar 08 '18 at 20:54
  • @gimusi : Btw I am myself a learner here. And there is a lot which I don't know and some things which I know very well. – Paramanand Singh Mar 08 '18 at 20:56
  • @ParamanandSingh Is there a translation to the Turkish language? – MathLover Mar 08 '18 at 20:58
  • 1
    @MathLover : it's an old book from 1940s. I don't think there is any translation into any language. But you can try Google translate. Best would be to find a friend in your country who knows good English and ask him to translate. Bye for now. Enjoy learning here. – Paramanand Singh Mar 08 '18 at 21:01
4

I thought it might be instructive to present a way forward the relies on pre-calculus tools only. To that end we proeed.


If we define $a^x$ by the expression $e^{\log(a)\,x}$, then we can write

$$\frac{a^x-1}{x}=\frac{e^{\log(a)\,x}-1}{x}\tag 1$$


In THIS ANSWER, I used only the limit definition of the exponential function along with Bernoulli's Inequality to show the exponential function satisfies the inequalities

$$1+x\le e^x\le \frac{1}{1-x}\tag2$$

for $x<1$.


Applying $(2)$ to $(1)$ reveals for $0<x<1$

$$ \log(a) \le \frac{a^x-1}{x}\le \frac{\log(a)}{1-\log(a) x}\tag3$$

and for $x<0$

$$\frac{\log(a)}{1-\log(a)x}\le \frac{a^x-1}{x}\le \log(a)\tag 4$$

Finally, applying the squeeze theorem to $(3)$ and $(4)$ yields the coveted limit

$$\bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{a^x-1}{x}=\log(a)}$$

And we are done!

Mark Viola
  • 179,405
2

I guess one way to proceed is as follows. I use $\Delta$ to simplify notation. You need $$\lim_{\Delta \to 0} \frac{a^{\Delta} - 1}{\Delta}$$. Let $a = e^b$ or $b = \ln(a)$. multiplying numerator and denominator by $b$, you get the above equals $$b \cdot \lim_{\Delta \to 0} \frac{e^{b\Delta} -1}{b\Delta}$$ which is the derivative of $e^x$ at $x=0$ which is 1. So the expression you want is $b = \ln a$.

2

So here is a quick idea: let $\delta x = \log_a(1 + \frac{1}{n}) \to 0$ $$ \lim_{\delta x \to 0} \frac{a^{\delta x} - 1}{\delta x} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{n\cdot \log_a(1 + \frac{1}{n})} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \left(\log_a(1 + \frac{1}{n})^n \right)^{-1} \to \log_a(e)^{-1} = \ln(a)$$

C Marius
  • 1,257
1

If we accept

$$e^{x} = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \left(1 + \frac{x}{n}\right)^{n}$$

Then we try to prove:

\begin{equation} \lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \frac{e^{x} - 1}{x} = 1 \end{equation}

This will solve our problem, because then:

$$\lim_{h \rightarrow 0}\frac{a^{h} - a}{h} = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0}\frac{e^{h\ln(a)} - 1}{h} = \ln(a)\lim_{t \rightarrow 0}\frac{e^{t} - 1}{t} = \ln(a)$$

Where we use the substitution $t = h\ln(a)$. Now use the binomial theorem:

$$\lim_{x \rightarrow 0}\frac{e^{x} - 1}{x} = \lim_{x \rightarrow 0}\frac{\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\sum_{k = 0}^{n}\binom{n}{k}\frac{x^{k}}{n^{k}} - 1}{x} = 1 + \lim_{x \rightarrow 0}\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\sum_{k = 2}^{n}\binom{n}{k}\frac{x^{k-1}}{n^{k}}$$

Since $\binom{n}{k} \leq n^{k}$ for all $k \geq 0$, we have:

$$\left|\sum_{k = 2}^{n}\binom{n}{k}\frac{x^{k-1}}{n^{k}}\right| \leq \sum_{k = 1}^{n-1} |x|^{k} \leq \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}|x|^{k} = \frac{|x|}{1 - |x|}$$

And so:

$$\lim_{x \rightarrow 0}\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{k = 2}^{n}\binom{n}{k}\frac{x^{k-1}}{n^{k}} = 0$$

Alex Zorn
  • 4,304
  • While this is rigorous, it does not discuss how $\log$ and equation $a^h=e^{h\log a} $ come into picture. Also one needs to show that $e^{x+y} =e^xe^y$ if one tries to find the derivative of $a^x$. – Paramanand Singh Mar 06 '18 at 07:51
1

enter image description here $$\phantom{extra characters. Please convert the image above to Latex.}$$

Jack D'Aurizio
  • 353,855