I personally think using the definition works best here.
Say $\lim \;a_n =\ell $. Then
$$\left|\frac 1 n \sum_{k=1}^n a_k-\ell \right|=$$
$$\left|\frac 1 n \sum_{k=1}^n a_k-\frac 1 n \sum_{k=1}^n \ell \right|=$$
$$\frac 1 n\left| \sum_{k=1}^n (a_k- \ell) \right|$$
Now, we know that:
$(a)$ we can make $|a_k-\ell| $ small by taking $k$ sufficiently large
$(b)$ we can make, for any $M$, $M/n$ small by taking $n$ large.
The idea now is to split the sum in two: a tail, that we will make small by using $(a)$, and some first terms, which we will make small by using $(b)$. Let $\epsilon >0$ be given. Let $N$ be such that $|a_k-\ell|<\epsilon/2$ when $n\geq N$. So
$$\frac 1 n\left| \sum_{k=1}^n (a_k- \ell) \right|\leq \frac 1 n \sum_{k=1}^{N} |a_k- \ell| +\frac 1 n \sum_{k=N+1}^n |a_k- \ell| $$
Set $\Phi_N=\max\limits_{1\leq k \leq N}|a_k-\ell|$. Note that $\Phi_N$ gets fixed for every choice of $N$ we make, and it can't get too large. In fact, since $a_k\to \ell$, we must have that $\Phi_N$ is not larger than $\sup |a_k-\ell|=\Phi$.
Since
$$\frac 1 n \sum_{k=N+1}^n |a_k- \ell|<\frac 1 n\frac \epsilon 2 \sum_{k=N+1}^n 1=\\=\frac {n-N} n\frac \epsilon 2$$
then
$$\frac 1 n\left| \sum_{k=1}^n (a_k- \ell) \right|<\frac N n \Phi -\frac \epsilon 2 \frac {N}{n}+\frac \epsilon 2 $$
Now it is all done take $N_1$ so that for $n>N_1$ $$\eqalign{
& \frac{{N\Phi}}{n} < {\epsilon}/2 \cr
& \frac{N}{n} < {1} \cr} $$
Then, for $n>N_2=\max(N,N_1)$ we will certainly have
$$\frac 1 n\left| \sum_{k=1}^n (a_k- \ell) \right|<\frac N n \Phi -\frac \epsilon 2 \frac {N}{n}+\frac \epsilon 2 <\frac \epsilon 2+\frac \epsilon 2=\epsilon $$
so that $\hat a_n \to \ell$. This nice exercise is telling you that every summable sequence is also Cèsaro summable, by the way.