15

tldr

Feel free to skip to the integrals at the end.


I was curious as to whether or not for $n\in\mathbb N$, $\Gamma(1/n)$ satisfies the form

$$\Gamma(1/n)=a\pi^{b/n}\prod_k\operatorname{agm}(1,c_k)^{d_k}$$

Where $a,c_k,d_k$ are algebraic and $b$ is natural and $\operatorname{agm}$ is the arithmetic-geometric mean given by

$$\operatorname{agm}(x,y)=\lim_{n\to\infty}a_n\\a_0=x,~g_0=y\\a_{n+1}=\frac{a_n+g_n}2,\quad g_{n+1}=\sqrt{a_ng_n}$$

The first few values can be derived from this PDF.

$$\Gamma(1/1)=1$$

$$\Gamma(1/2)=\pi^{1/2}$$

$$\Gamma(1/3)=\frac{\pi^{2/3}2^{2/3}}{3^{1/12}\operatorname{agm}(1,3^{1/4}2^{-1/2})}$$

$$\Gamma(1/4)=\frac{2^{1/2}\pi^{3/4}}{\operatorname{agm}(1,2^{-1/2})}$$


However, it does not appear $\Gamma(1/5)$ can be written this way. The PDF gives

$$\Gamma(1/5)=\pi^{1/5}2^{19/50}5^{1/2}\phi^{1/10}H_1^{2/5}H_2^{1/5}$$

$$\phi=5+\sqrt5\\H_1=\int_0^1\frac{dx}{\sqrt{1-x^5}}\\H_2=\int_0^1\frac{x~dx}{\sqrt{1-x^5}}$$

And I'm uncertain about whether or not $H_1$ or $H_2$ can be written in the form of

$$\frac\pi{2\operatorname{agm}(1,\sqrt{1-x})}=\int_0^1\frac{dt}{\sqrt{(1-t^2)(1-xt^2)}},~x>0$$


Can $\Gamma(1/5)$ be written in terms of this arithmetic-geometric mean?

  • For what its worth, $H_1$ has hypergeometric forms $$H_1=~_2F_1\left(\frac15,\frac12;\frac65;1\right)$$ – Simply Beautiful Art Aug 08 '17 at 20:27
  • $\Gamma(1/5)=\pi^{1/5}2^{19/50}5^{1/2}\phi^{1/10}H_1^{2/5}H_2^{1/5}$ is correct. But of course that is not the question. – GEdgar Aug 08 '17 at 21:29
  • Lol, thanks for the verification @GEdgar – Simply Beautiful Art Aug 08 '17 at 21:30
  • $H_1$ and $H_2$ are Beta functions, so can be written in terms of Gamma functions. – GEdgar Aug 08 '17 at 21:33
  • Yes, ofc, but the goal is to get it down to the arithmetic geometric mean, a relatively simple thing to evaluate. Indeed, using the beta function is how one derives the $\Gamma(1/4)$ formula above. – Simply Beautiful Art Aug 08 '17 at 21:35
  • Oh, that's what you meant lol. Yes, we have$$H_1=\frac{\Gamma(6/5)}{\Gamma(7/10)}\sqrt\pi$$ – Simply Beautiful Art Aug 08 '17 at 21:43
  • And$$H_2=\frac{\Gamma(7/5)}{\Gamma(9/10)}\frac{\sqrt\pi}2$$ – Simply Beautiful Art Aug 08 '17 at 21:44
  • BTW the linked PDF in your question does not give evaluation of $\Gamma (1/3)$ but rather copies the value from mathworld page. Perhaps this evaluation is also desired. – Paramanand Singh Aug 11 '17 at 05:21
  • I think it is also best to mention the original paper (http://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/dms/load/img/?PPN=PPN243919689_0227&DMDID=DMDLOG_0008) of Chowla and Solberg where it is established that if $k$ is a singular elliptic modulus (ie the algebraic number $k$ is given by $$k=\dfrac{\vartheta_{2}^{2}(e^{-\pi\sqrt{n}})}{\vartheta_{3}^{2}(e^{-\pi\sqrt{n}})}$$ for some positive integer $n$) then the integral $$K(k) =\int_{0}^{\pi/2}\frac{dx}{\sqrt{1-k^{2}\sin^{2}x}}$$ can be expressed in terms of Gemma values (at rational points) and $\pi$. – Paramanand Singh Aug 11 '17 at 06:00
  • The linked paper in previous comment gives the link between $\Gamma(1/3)$ and elliptic integral $K$ using Kummer's formula for $\Gamma(x) $. – Paramanand Singh Aug 11 '17 at 06:11
  • @ParamanandSingh Interesting, thanks. – Simply Beautiful Art Aug 11 '17 at 12:58
  • Ramanujan knew the evaluation of $K(k) $ in terms of Gamma values and $\pi$ for some singular moduli $k$. And he mentions the evaluations corresponding to $n=1,2,3$ in his paper Modular equations and approximations to $\pi$. This means that the evaluation of the integral $K(k) $ for $k=\sin(\pi/12)$ in terms of $\Gamma (1/3)$ is possible using real analysis methods only. – Paramanand Singh Aug 12 '17 at 11:10

1 Answers1

3

This is not an answer. I still decided to post, because this is too long for a comment. For what it's worth I would bet on a negative answer, i.e. we can't represent $H_1$ and $H_2$ in terms of $\text{agm}$.

I tried to link the integrals from the OP to Carlson Elliptic Integrals which are more general than the classic elliptic integrals and have a very nice computation algorithm (which seems to be what the OP wants).

However, the integrals are much more complicated than that.

With simple enough transformations, I was able to express $H_2$ in the following form:

$$H_2=4 \int_0^\infty \frac{dt}{\sqrt{t(t+2)(t^4+3t^3+4t^2+2t+1)(t^4+5t^3+10t^2+10t+5)}}$$

$$H_2=4 \int_0^\infty \frac{t^{-1/2}dt}{\sqrt{(t+z_1)(t+z_2)\dots(t+z_9)}}$$

Which translates to the general function $R_{-a}(\mathbf{b},\mathbf{z})$ - see here.

$$H_2=\frac{2^7}{35} R_{-4} \left(\mathbf{\frac{1}{2}},\mathbf{z} \right) $$

Where $\mathbf{\frac{1}{2}},\mathbf{z}$ are vectors of dimension $9$.

Since the most complicated of Carlson integrals only has $5$ factors under the root, there doesn't seem to be a way to represent $H_2$ in terms of Carlson integrals, or indeed, classic elliptic integrals.

Still, this representation might be useful if one wishes to study the properties of $R_{-a}(\mathbf{b},\mathbf{z})$ in general, which are rather nice.


Explicitly $z_k$ can be written the following way:

$$z_1=2$$

Now introducing:

$$a_+=\sqrt{5}+i \sqrt{2(5-\sqrt{5})}$$ $$a_-=\sqrt{5}-i \sqrt{2(5-\sqrt{5})}$$ $$b_+=\sqrt{5}+i \sqrt{2(5+\sqrt{5})}$$ $$b_-=\sqrt{5}-i \sqrt{2(5+\sqrt{5})}$$

We can write the rest as:

$$z_2=\frac{1}{4}(3-a_-)$$ $$z_3=\frac{1}{4}(3-a_+)$$ $$z_4=\frac{1}{4}(3+b_-)$$ $$z_5=\frac{1}{4}(3+b_+)$$ $$ $$ $$z_6=\frac{1}{4}(5+a_-)$$ $$z_7=\frac{1}{4}(5+a_+)$$ $$z_8=\frac{1}{4}(5-b_-)$$ $$z_9=\frac{1}{4}(5-b_+)$$


Of course, $H_2$ can also be expressed in a much more simple form as a Hypergeometric function:

$$H_2=\frac{1}{2} {_2F_1} \left(\frac{1}{2},\frac{2}{5}; \frac{7}{5};1 \right)$$


Meanwhile, $H_1$ can be represented as:

$$H_1=\int_0^\infty \frac{(t+1)dt}{\sqrt{t(t+1)(t^4+5t^3+10t^2+10t+5)}}$$

$$H_1=\frac{2}{3} R_{-1} \left(\mathbf{\frac{1}{2}},\mathbf{z} \right)+\frac{4}{3} R_{-2} \left(\mathbf{\frac{1}{2}},\mathbf{z} \right) $$

Where $$z_1=1$$

$$z_2=\frac{1}{4}(5+a_-)$$ $$z_3=\frac{1}{4}(5+a_+)$$ $$z_4=\frac{1}{4}(5-b_-)$$ $$z_5=\frac{1}{4}(5-b_+)$$

Even though it's simpler than $H_2$, it still doesn't reduce to Carlson elliptic integrals.


We can derive alternative representations for $H_1$ and $H_2$ in terms of $R$ functions, using the relation:

$${_2F_1}(a,b;c;z)=R_{-a}(b,c-b;1-z,1)$$

However, even these, shorter representations do not reduce to Carlson integrals, but rather to their values in terms of Gamma functions.

Yuriy S
  • 31,474