Notice that $\sin(x)$ is a transcendental function. By nature, the inverse of the function $f(x)=x\sin(x)$ must then also be a transcendental function. Thus, the recommended path to finding the solution is a numerical method. One of the simplest of such is fixed-point iteration:
$$x\sin(x)=1$$
$$x=\csc(x)$$
$$x_{n+1}=\csc(x_n)$$
Let us assume that by graphing, the solution is something along the lines of $x\approx1.1$, or we would say $x_0=1.1$
$$\begin{align}x_1&=1.122073319\\x_2&=1.109875677\\x_3&=1.116515795\\x_4&=1.112870714\\\vdots\\x_{29}&=1.114157141\end{align}$$
$$x_{29}\sin(x_{29})=1.0000\dots$$
One could use the much better method known as Newton's method, which is basically taking tangent lines to approximate. Here, we would have
$$x_{n+1}=x_n-\frac{x_n\sin(x_n)-1}{\sin(x_n)+x_n\cos(x_n)}$$
Again, starting with $x_0=1.1$, we get
$$\begin{align}x_1&=1.114150789\\x_2&=1.114157141\end{align}$$
and thus we are already at the $29$th fixed-point iteration term. (lol?)
Upon the OP's request, I will show that the answer cannot be a rational multiple of $\pi$. This is simple, since it can be found that for $x$ being any rational multiple of $\pi$, $\sin(x)$ is algebraic. It is then found that $x\sin(x)$ will be transcendental. Clearly this cannot be the case, since $x\sin(x)=1$, an algebraic number.
Since $\sin(x)$ has no trivially known value in terms of special constants and such whenever $x$ is not a rational multiple of $\pi$, one cannot derive a closed form AFAIK.