Let $f: [0,1]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2$ be a continuous and injective function and $C=f([0,1])$. Is it true that $\mathbb{R}^2\setminus C$ is path connected?
It's pretty obvious that the answer should be positive, but it would be nice if there existed a not quite involved proof of it.
My attempt so far: For every $x\in C$ there exists an $\varepsilon_x>0$ such that $B(x,\varepsilon_x)\cap C$ is connected. (Here by $B(x, \varepsilon)$ we denote the open ball centered at $x$ with radius $\varepsilon$). This is pretty straightforward because $[0,1]$ and $f([0,1])$ are homeomorphic.
The collection $ \{ B(x, \varepsilon_x): x\in C\}$ is an open cover of the compact set $C$, so there exist $x_1, \ldots, x_n$ such that $C\subseteq \bigcup_{i=1}^n B(x_i, \varepsilon_{x_i})=A$. Lets also assume that the $x_i$'s are "consecutive" with $x_1$ and $x_n$ be the starting and ending points of the curve respectively. We notice in particular that both of the sets $B(x_1, \varepsilon_{x_1})\setminus C$ and $B(x_n, \varepsilon_{x_n})\setminus C$ are path connected. This is a nice property that we will need.
An easy (?) inductive argument shows that $A\setminus C$ is path connected. This is all due to $B(x_1, \varepsilon_1)\setminus C$ being path connected combined with the fact that the set $ B(x_2, \varepsilon_2) \cap C^c $ consists of two connected components, both of which intersect with $B(x_1, \varepsilon_1)$ and so on. From this it follows that $\mathbb{R}^2 \setminus C$ is path connected as well.
I think the proof is ok, but it uses a lot of stuff. Am I missing something obvious here? I also tried to go by contradiction. I supposed that $C$ cuts the plane into some path connected components and then I tried to close the curve avoiding self intersections. The plan was to create more than 2 path connected components and reach a contradiction by the Jordan Curve Theorem. This seemed quicker, but it didn't go through.