0

In a Complex Analysis course I'm asked to show that the rational root theorem is true, stated as follows.

Show that the following holds true: Let the real rational number $p/q$ (where $p$ and $q$ have no common factor except $\pm 1$ be a solution of $$a_n z^n + a_{n-1}z^{n-1} + \ldots + a_1 z + a_0 = 0, \quad a_j \in \mathbb{Z}.$$ Then $q$ must be a factor of $a_n$ and $p$ must be a factor of $a_0$.

Now, for $n=1$, I can show $p = a_0\frac{-a_1}{q}$ and $q = a_1\frac{-a_0}{p}$.

For $n = 2$, we have $p = \frac{q}{2a_2}(-a_1 \pm \sqrt{a_1^2-4a_2a_0}) =^{?} a_0 (\ldots).$

I suppose we need to somehow use that $a_j \in \mathbb Z$ and $p,q \in \mathbb Z$.

Furthermore, the exercise asks me to show, rather than to prove. But still, can someone point me in the right direction?

Mussé Redi
  • 1,429

1 Answers1

2

If $z = p/q$ is a rational root $$a_n z^n + a_{n-1}z^{n-1} + \ldots + a_1 z + a_0 = 0$$ reads $$a_n \frac{p^n}{q^n} + \ldots + a_1 \frac{p}{q} + a_0 = 0$$ which multiplied by $q^n$ gives $$a_n p^n + a_{n-1}q p^{n-1} + \ldots + a_1 p q^{n-1} = - a_0 q^n$$

As $p$ divides the lefthand side, p divides the righthand one, and by hypothesis, as $p$ and $q$ cannot have other common factors than $\pm 1$, $p$ divides $a_0$.

But we can also write

$$- a_n p^n = a_{n-1}q p^{n-1} + \ldots + a_1 p q^{n-1} +a_0 q^n$$ so that $q$ dividing the righthand side divides also the lefthand one, and as $p$ and $q$ cannot have other common factors than $\pm 1$, $q$ divides $a_n$.

Olórin
  • 12,040
  • Excellent. The argument of considering $p$ and $q$ as divisors of equations is very neat. – Mussé Redi Aug 25 '16 at 20:45
  • 1
    @MusséRedi It is worth emphasizing that this proof depends crucially on FTA = fundamental theorem of arithmetic (existence and uniqueness of prime factorizations), even though that is not explicitly stated. Normally one deduces those divisibilities by using consequences of FTA such as Euclid's Lemma $,(\gcd(a,b)=1,\ a\mid bc,\Rightarrow,a\mid c),$ or closely related results. Without such fundamental results the Rational Root Test need not hold, e.g. it may fail in rings of algebraic integers. – Bill Dubuque Aug 25 '16 at 21:22