I am starting out with the following:
$$ \frac{d^n}{dx^n}[g(x)^{f(x)}] = \sum_{c=0}^n g(x)^{f(x)-c}\lambda_{n,c}(x) $$
Therefore:
$$ \frac{d^{n+1}}{dx^{n+1}}[g(x)^{f(x)}] = \sum_{c=0}^{n+1}g(x)^{f(x)-c}\lambda_{n+1,c}(x) = \frac{d}{dx}\sum_{c=0}^n g(x)^{f(x)-c}\lambda_{n,c}(x) $$
$\lambda_{n,c}(x)$ is defined like so:
$$ \lambda_{n,c}(x) = \sum_{k=c}^n \sum_{j=0}^{k-c} {k-c \choose j} \ln(g(x))^{k-c-j} \frac{d^j}{df^j}[f(x)_c] B_{n,k}^{(f \diamond g)^c}(x) $$
My goal is to find a recurrence relation for $B_{n,k}^{(f \diamond g)^c}(x)$ by setting the two expressions equal to eachother. This is my work so far:
$$ \frac{d}{dx}[g(x)^{f(x)-c} \lambda_{n,c}(x)] = \left((f(x)-c)\frac{g'(x)}{g(x)} + \ln(g(x)) f'(x)\right)g(x)^{f(x)-c} \lambda_{n,c}(x) + g(x)^{f(x)-c} \frac{d}{dx}[\lambda_{n,c}(x)] $$ Note from now on i will denote $\frac{d^j}{df^j}[f(x)_c] = f_c^{(j)}$ $$ \frac{d}{dx}[\lambda_{n,c}(x)] = \sum_{k=c}^n \sum_{j=0}^{k-c} {k-c \choose j} \left(\frac{g'(x)}{g(x)}(k-c-j) \ln(g(x))^{k-c-j-1} f_c^{(j)} B_{n,k}^{(f \diamond g)^c} + \ln(g(x))^{k-c-j} \frac{d}{dx}[f_c^{(j}B_{n,k}^{(f \diamond g)^c}]\right) $$
Now, for me to find an expression that will result in a recurrence relation i am going to attempt to group all the $\ln(g(x))^{k-c-j}$ together and set all these terms equal to:
$$ \sum_{c=0}^{n+1} g(x)^{f(x)-c} \lambda_{n+1,c}(x) $$
By doing this i will have found a way to isolate the $g(x)^{f(x)-c}$ terms as well as the $\ln(g(x))^{k-c-j}$ terms.
To do this i will seperate each individual term and attempt to manipulate it in order to fit these conditions:
$$ A = f'(x) \ln(g(x)) \lambda_{n,c}(x) = f'(x) \sum_{k=c}^n \sum_{j=0}^{k-c} {k-c \choose j} \ln(g(x))^{k-c-j+1} f_c^{(j)} B_{n,k}^{(f \diamond g)^c}(x) = f'(x) \sum_{k=c+1}^{n+1} \sum_{j=0}^{k-c-1} {k-c-1 \choose j} \ln(g(x))^{k-c-j} f_c^{(j)} B_{n,k-1}^{(f \diamond g)^c}(x) $$ Now,for $B$ i will shift over a step backwards so that instead of $c$ we will be dealing with $c-1$, this is because of the differentiation of the natural log which in turn results in $\frac{g'(x)}{g(x)}$. When we multiply $\frac{g'(x)}{g(x)}$ with $g(x)^{f(x)-c}$ we will get $g'(x) g(x)^{f(x)-c-1}$ therefore by evaluating the expression at $c-1$ we will be evaluating the part of the summation that is dealing with $g(x)^{f(x)-c}$ instead of dealing with the summation that deals with $g(x)^{f(x)-c-1}$. If there is any questions about this please do not hesitate to ask in the comments. $$ B = g'(x) (f(x)-c+1) \lambda_{n,c-1}(x) = g'(x) (f(x)-c+1) \sum_{k=c-1}^n \sum_{j=0}^{k-c+1} {k-c+1 \choose j} \ln(g(x))^{k-c-j+1} f_{c-1}^j B_{n,k}^{(f \diamond g)^{c-1}}(x) = g'(x) (f(x)-c+1) \sum_{k=c}^{n+1} \sum_{j=0}^{k-c} {k-c \choose j} \ln(g(x))^{k-c-j} f_{c-1}^j B_{n,k-1}^{(f \diamond g)^{c-1}}(x) $$ Now, for $C$ and $D$ i will split up the two parts in the part where i differentiated the $\lambda_{n,c}(x)$, in variable $C$ we will be using the same logic as i used for "shifting" the $c$ variable to $c-1$.
$$ C = \lambda_{n,c}'(x)_{part \space 1} = g'(x)\sum_{k=c-1}^{n} \sum_{j=0}^{k-c+1} {k-c+1 \choose j} (k-c-j+1) \ln(g(x))^{k-c-j} f_{c-1}^{(j)} B_{n,k}^{(f \diamond g)^{c-1}}(x) = g'(x)\sum_{k=c}^{n+1} \sum_{j=0}^{k-c} {k-c \choose j} (k-c-j) \ln(g(x))^{k-c-j} f_{c-1}^{(j)} B_{n,k}^{(f \diamond g)^{c-1}}(x) $$ Now for $C$ i did a little bit of trickery, first of all, when $k=c-1$ the term is equal to zero due to the $(k-c+1)$ term and when $j = (k-c+1)$ the term is equal to zero due to the $(k-c-j+1)$ term. $$ D = \lambda_{n,c}'(x)_{part \space 2} = \sum_{k=c}^n \sum_{j=0}^{k-c} {k-c \choose j} \ln(g(x))^{k-c-j} \frac{d}{dx}[f_c^{(j)} B_{n,k}^{(f \diamond g)^c}(x)] $$
Now the problem arises when i try to add $A+B+C+D$ and set it equal to $\lambda_{n+1,c}(x)$. i have attempted to do this many times but i have hit some points where it becomes troubling or that the identity does now work at all. If someone can please help me with the issue it would be alot of help to me. Thank you all for reading this if you have gotten this far, i appreciate it a lot.
But i like this formula because it expresses the complete bell polynomial in a unique way. Its actually quite interesting isn't it?
– Eric L May 03 '15 at 22:52