2

Prove that $$Z_t:=\frac{e^{W_t^2/(1+2t)}}{\sqrt{1+2t}}$$ is a $\mathscr{F}_t$-martingale. I have tried all the usual manipulations without any success. The only useful fact I think should be used is that: if $X_t\sim N(\mu,\sigma^2)$ then: $\mathbb{E}[e^{\alpha\frac{X^2_t}{\sigma^2}}]=\frac{e^{(\frac{\mu^2\alpha}{\sigma^2(1-2\alpha)})}}{\sqrt{1-2\alpha}}(1)$

EDIT: I will answer my question.

mastro
  • 735
  • 2
    "I have tried all the usual manipulations" Excellent! Please show them. – Did Jan 04 '15 at 11:09
  • 1
    First I computed $\mathbb{E}[Z_t]$ to have an idea about $Z_t$: $Z_t=exp(\frac{W_t^2}{(1+2t)}\cdot\frac{t}{t})/\sqrt{1+2t}= exp(\alpha_t W_t^2/t)/\sqrt{1+2t}$ with $\alpha_t= t/(1+2t)$. Then, using the result I previously mentioned, this yields $\mathbb{E}[Z_t]=1$. – mastro Jan 04 '15 at 11:20
  • 1
    Then since by increments-indipendence: $(W_t-W_s)\ indip\ of\ \mathscr{F_s}$, then $(W_t-W_s)^2\ indip\ of\ \mathscr{F_s}$. So I tried to reproduce this squared binomial in $Z_t$ in order to get rid of the conditional expectation. However, then I get a term like $e^{2W_tW_s/\sqrt(1+2s)\sqrt(1+2t)}$ of which I can't compute the expectation. Moreover, getting rid of the expectation in this way doesn't seem to help me. – mastro Jan 04 '15 at 11:33
  • "EDIT: I will answer my question." ...They said, after two detailed answers were posted. – Did Jan 20 '15 at 21:00

3 Answers3

3

Hint: Since $W_t=W_s+\sqrt{t-s}\,Y$ where $Y$ is standard normal and independent of $\mathscr F_s$, $$E(Z_t\mid\mathscr F_s)=\frac{g(W_s,\sqrt{t-s},1+2t)}{\sqrt{1+2t}},\qquad g(w,a,b)=E(\mathrm e^{(w+aY)^2)/b}).$$ Hence the task is to compute the function $g$ and even, more precisely, to show that, for every $(w,a,b)$ such that $b\gt2a^2$, $$g(w,a,b)=\frac{\mathrm e^{w^2/(b-2a^2)}}{\sqrt{b-2a^2}}.$$

Did
  • 279,727
  • Filippo: Your downvote? – Did Jan 04 '15 at 13:53
  • I cannot downclick because I dont have enough point to do it! I just wanted to thank you actually. I edited the answer with more detail, hope it's better. – mastro Jan 04 '15 at 14:11
  • 1
    I have just answered the question. – mastro Jan 04 '15 at 15:00
  • The first very serious problem in your approach is that you apply (1) to a non-centered gaussian random variable. – Did Jan 04 '15 at 15:03
  • Edited. I have now problems computing:

    $\mathbb{E}[e^{W_t^2}]$

    – mastro Jan 04 '15 at 15:11
  • Perhaps you have problems computing this, but this is not all you need to complete the exercise (as explained in details, if I may mention this, in my answer...). – Did Jan 04 '15 at 21:20
  • Interesting downvote--purely for mathematical reasons, to be sure. – Did Jan 15 '15 at 13:11
1

I don't know much about probabilities and its well-known formulas so let me try it from scratch.

Assume $Z\sim N(\mu,\sigma^2)$ and let us compute $E\left[e^{Z^2}\right]$.

$$\begin{align}E\left[e^{Z^2}\right]&=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{x^2}e^{-\frac{\left(x-\mu\right)}{2\sigma^2}}dx\\&=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-\frac{\left(x-\frac{\mu}{1-2\sigma^2}\right)^2-\frac{2\sigma^2}{(1-2\sigma^2)}}{2\sigma^2/(1-2\sigma^2)}}dx\\&=\frac{e^{\frac{\mu^2}{1-2\sigma^2}}}{\sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-\frac{y^2}{2\sigma^2/(1-2\sigma^2)}}dy\\&=\frac{e^{\frac{\mu^2}{1-2\sigma^2}}}{\sqrt{1-2\sigma^2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-s^2/2\sigma^2}\\&=\frac{e^{\frac{\mu^2}{1-2\sigma^2}}}{\sqrt{1-2\sigma^2}}\end{align}$$

Summarizing

$$\begin{equation}Z\sim N(\mu,\sigma^2)\implies E\left[e^{Z^2}\right]=\frac{e^{\frac{\mu^2}{1-2\sigma^2}}}{\sqrt{1-2\sigma^2}}\end{equation}\ \ \ \ \ \ \ (1)$$


We try now to compute $E\left[Z_t|F_s\right]$. Let's see

$$\begin{align}E\left[Z_t|F_s\right]&=E\left[\frac{e^{W_t^2/(1+2t)}}{\sqrt{1+2t}}| F_s\right]\\&=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+2t}}E\left[e^{\left(W_t-W_s+W_s\right)^2/(1+2t)}| F_s\right]\\&=\frac{e^{W_s^2/(1+2t)}}{\sqrt{1+2t}}E\left[e^{(W_t-W_s)^2/(1+2t)}e^{2(W_t-W_s)W_s/(1+2t)}|F_s\right]\end{align}$$

To shorten notation let me put $Z:=(W_t-W_s)/\sqrt{1+2t}$ and $X_s:=W_s/\sqrt{1+2t}$. With this notation we continue the computation of the conditional expectation above.

$$\begin{align}E\left[E^{Z^2}E^{2ZX}|F_s\right]&=E\left[\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{2^kX_2^kZ^k}{k!}e^{Z^2}|F_s\right]\\&=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}E\left[X_s^k\frac{2^kZ^k}{k!}e^{Z^2}|F_s\right]\\&=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}X_s^k(\omega')E\left[\frac{2^kZ^k(\omega)}{k!}e^{Z^2}|F_s\right]\\&=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}X_s^k(\omega')E_\omega\left[\frac{2^kZ^k(\omega)}{k!}e^{Z^2}\right]\\&=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}E_\omega\left[\frac{2^kX_s^k(\omega')Z^k(\omega)}{k!}e^{Z^2}\right]\\&=E_\omega\left[e^{Z^2(\omega)}e^{2X_s(\omega')Z(\omega)}\right]\end{align}$$

(I wrote explicitly in the few last lines the state variables and a subscript on the expectation to indicate with respect to which this is computed).

Putting this in the previous computation we get

$$E\left[Z_t|F_s\right]=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+2t}}E_\omega\left[e^{(Z+X_s(\omega'))^2}\right]$$

Now we apply the formula (1) to $Z+X_s(\omega')\sim N\left(\frac{W_s(\omega')}{\sqrt{1+2t}},\frac{t-s}{1+2t}\right)$ to finally get

$$E\left[Z_t|F_s\right]=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+2t}}e^{W_s^2/(1+2s)}\frac{\sqrt{1+2t}}{\sqrt{1+2s}}=Z_s.$$

Pp..
  • 5,973
0

$\mathbb{E}[Z_t|\mathscr{F_s}]= \mathbb{E}[exp{(W_t-W_s+W_s)^2/(1+2t)}|\mathscr{F_s}]/\sqrt{1+2t}$.

Now call $Y:=W_t-W_s$. One has that $Y\sim N(0,t-s)$ and $Y$ is independent of $\mathscr{F_s}$. Moreover since $W_s$ is $\mathscr{F_s}$-measurable, we can treat it like a constant and therefore one has:

$\tilde Y := W_s + Y \sim N(W_s, t-s)$. $\tilde Y$ is therefore independent of $\mathscr{F_s}$ and we get:

$\mathbb{E}[Z_t] = \mathbb{E}[e^{\tilde Y^2/(1+2t)}]/\sqrt{1+2t}= \mathbb{E}[e^{\tilde Y^2\cdot\frac{t-s}{1+2t}\frac{1}{t-s}}]/\sqrt{1+2t} $.

Now we can apply (1) with $\alpha = \frac{t-s}{1+2t}$ yielding the desired result, hence:

$\mathbb{E}[Z_t|\mathscr{F_s}]= Z_s$.

mastro
  • 735
  • Wonderful. $ $ $ $ – Did Jan 20 '15 at 20:53
  • Actually, not so wonderful: "$\tilde Y$ is therefore independent of $\mathscr{F_s}$" is squarely wrong. – Did Jan 20 '15 at 21:02
  • @Did man what is this rage? First of all I answered the question on date Jan 4 at 15:00 by editing the question, today I just posted it as an actual answer. Secondly, I tried to use your hint and it did not work. Finally, the other answer way less computationally efficient then mine and it uses calculus, while I just use martingale properties. Now that you sarcastically comment, I see that the answer has a failure as you pointed out, and therefore it is not correct, but sincerely I don't see the reason for so much hate. – mastro Jan 20 '15 at 21:12
  • 2
    Rage? Hate? Sincerely, where? Do not flatter yourself, Filippo. – Did Jan 20 '15 at 21:13
  • Man you commented all my un-answered question, anyway thanks for the remark. – mastro Jan 20 '15 at 21:15
  • 2
    It seems only fair that potential answerers be informed of your rather idiosyncratic approach to others' answers, don't you think? – Did Jan 20 '15 at 21:17
  • What can I do to repair the error? – mastro Jan 20 '15 at 21:21
  • 3
    Mathematically? Read my answer slowly. About your approach to math.SE? Sorry but somehow, I feel this is not my problem. – Did Jan 20 '15 at 21:24