I have to prove that these formulas are equivalent: $$\begin{align} \exists x \forall y P(x,y) \equiv \forall y \exists x P(x,y) \\ \end{align}$$ Can I say that $$\begin{align} \forall y \exists x P(x,y) \equiv \neg \exists x \forall y P(x,y) \\ \end{align}$$ And the result is $\neq$ ?
Asked
Active
Viewed 1,190 times
1
-
1The formulas $\exists x \forall y P(x,y)$ and $\forall y \exists x P(x,y)$ are not equivalent. – drhab Nov 03 '14 at 16:59
-
Related: Confused between Nested Quantifiers; Nested Quantifiers true or false – MJD Nov 03 '14 at 17:57
1 Answers
3
You can't prove that they are equivalent because they aren't.
For example, suppose $P(x,y)$ is $x=y$. Then $\exists x\forall y(x=y)$ means that there exists something that equals everything (which is very false in a universe with more than one individual), whereas $\forall y\exists x(x=y)$ merely says that everything has something it is equal to (which is trivially true -- everything is equal to itself).
$\forall y\exists x P(x,y)$ is not equivalent to $\neg \exists x\forall y P(x,y)$ either. Here, if $P(x,y)$ means $x=x$ (that is, always true), then $\forall y\exists x P(x,y)$ is true in all worlds with at least one inhabitant, whereas $\neg\exists x\forall y P(x,y)$ is false in all those worlds.

hmakholm left over Monica
- 286,031