0

A SW-Component "SWC-A" is integrated with a SW-Component "SWC-B". The SWC-A has an output interface which provides "Distance in meters". The SWC-B receives this value and does some calculation. If in SWC-B interprets the received value is interpreted as "Distance in Feet" and not in meters. How can this scenario be tested (static/dynamic), where Units of measure between two components are different.

lerner1225
  • 101
  • Can you give some more information about how these two components interact? Is one component passed as a constructor argument to another? A function argument maybe? Is the result of A being passed to B via an object that coordinates A and B? – Greg Burghardt Mar 05 '19 at 12:19
  • There is no way, in general, to test this error. – BobDalgleish Mar 05 '19 at 14:38

2 Answers2

6

If the calculation is deterministic, the values of correct (in meters) and incorrect (in feet) results are known to you in advance for any specific input. Choose an input to A and write tests for the output of B based upon the possible output values. One test to tell if the result is correct, and another to test for the specific case where the result is wrong because B assumed feet instead of meters.

Joe
  • 414
  • Can you provide an example? I can't think of a way to tell whether the value 2 is in feet or in meters. – BobDalgleish Mar 05 '19 at 14:43
  • 1
    @BobDalgleish You know what your method is supposed to do, so you know what the answer should be. E.g., you want to calculate how long it takes to fall a distance x. If x is 5 meters, the answer should be ~1 second, whereas if it was 5 feet, the answer should be ~0.5 second. If you input 5 to SWC-A, the answer should be 1. If you input 5 to SWC-B, the answer should be 0.5. – mmathis Mar 05 '19 at 15:36
  • You have two independent parameters for your proposed test, which you can test against. On the other hand if SWC-B calculates the area, then no test is possible. – BobDalgleish Mar 05 '19 at 18:28
  • @BobDalgleish In the case of area, units don't matter. The question implicitly suggests units matter. – Joe Mar 05 '19 at 20:14
  • @Joe well, units do matter very much with area - 5 m^2 is quite a larger area than 5 ft^2. The problem here is that it is impossible to differentiate the two cases, without some additional work. – mmathis Mar 06 '19 at 00:24
  • @mmathis Sure, but if the problem is that B doesn’t understand units, then numerically the area is going to be the same whether it’s square feet or square meters, so the error between A and B wouldn’t exist in that case. You’d need some other term in the calculation done by B where the units matter, e.g. force of some sort. – Joe Mar 06 '19 at 03:31
0

If you have the ability to change the codebase(s), you can add the notion of a measurement unit to your methods, either as a separate class or as an additional (string) parameter. I've worked with products / APIs that had a fully-fleshed out unit and coordinate system, defining unit, unit measurement, symbols, as well as a complete conversion utility. That may be overkill for your application, but even a smaller subset of those classes would very clearly define the units being used in your methods / classes. This would then lend itself to testing using feet and meters in both methods / components.

A Measurement class may be as simple as a value and a unit symbol (m), or include the unit string (meters), or an entire class for the unit. Depends on how flexible you need it to be.

A word of wisdom from experience in dealing with various unit systems: your API should always use a single unit system - whether it be SI, Imperial, or some hodge-podge of units common to your domain (in oil & gas, for instance, it is common to work with times in milliseconds, so using the SI standard of seconds would be a bit unwieldy). The expected units should also be clearly defined in your documentation, so there is never any confusion as to what units need to be passed in.

mmathis
  • 5,468