Questions tagged [symplectic-linear-algebra]

Questions about vector spaces equipped with a symplectic form, a non-degenerate, skew-symmetric bilinear form.

A symplectic vector space is a vector space $V$ over a field $F$ (for example the real numbers $\Bbb{R}$) equipped with a symplectic bilinear form.

A symplectic bilinear form is a mapping $ω : V \times V → F$ that is

  • bilinear: linear in each argument separately,
  • alternating: $ω(v, v) = 0\; $ holds for all $v ∈ V$, and
  • non-degenerate: $ω(u, v) = 0\; $ for all $v ∈ V$ implies that $u$ is zero.

If the underlying field has characteristic not $2$, alternation is equivalent to skew-symmetry. If the characteristic is $2$, skew-symmetry is implied by, but does not imply alternation. In this case every symplectic form is a symmetric form, but not vice versa. Working in a fixed basis, $ω$ can be represented by a matrix. The conditions above say that this matrix must be skew-symmetric, non-singular, and hollow. This is not the same thing as a symplectic matrix, which represents a symplectic transformation of the space. If $V$ is finite-dimensional, then its dimension must necessarily be even because every skew-symmetric, hollow matrix of odd size has determinant zero. Notice the condition that the matrix be hollow is not redundant if the characteristic of the field is $2$. A symplectic form behaves quite differently from a symmetric form; for example, the scalar product on Euclidean vector spaces.

268 questions
7
votes
3 answers

What is a physical interpretation of a skew symmetric bilinear form?

Bilinear forms can give us a notion of distance, whether it is the typical Euclidean distance, or the spacetime interval between two events in Minkowski space. But what about skew-symmetric bilinear forms? Skew-symmetry means that every vector has…
koobtseej
  • 595
3
votes
1 answer

Is there a counterpart of the Mazur-Ulam theorem for symplectic transformations instead of isometries?

Let $V$ be a finite dimensional real vector space, and $g$ a nondegenerate symmetric positive definite bilinear form (i.e. scalar product) on it. Let's take a $f: V\to V$ map. According to the Mazur-Ulam theorem, if $f(0)=0$ and $g(fu,fv)=g(u,v)$…
mma
  • 2,033
2
votes
0 answers

Is the symplectic complement of a symplectic subspace is still symplectic in infinite dimensional symplectic vector space?

Let $(V,\omega)$ be an infinite dimensional symplectic vector space with a symplectic form $\omega.$ Is the symplectic complement $W^\omega$ of a symplectic subspace $W\subset V$ is still symplectic? I came out with this question when I was trying…
Fanyon
  • 93
2
votes
1 answer

Symplectic geometry property: $(A+B)^{\circ} = A^{\circ}\cap B^{\circ}$

Let $F$ be a subspace of a symplectic space $P$, we denote by $F^{\circ}$ a symplectic orthogonal of $F$. Why is $(A+B)^{\circ} = A^{\circ}\cap B^{\circ}$, or where can I find the proof of this fact?
1
vote
0 answers

Stable flag for a self adjoint operator in a symplectic vector space

I'm trying to learn some facts concerning symplectic spaces and I have found this affirmation I cannot prove: If $x$ is self adjoint in a symplectic vector space then there's an isotropic flag $V_1\subset V_2\subset \cdots\subset V_n$ stable by $x$.…
jisep
  • 11
1
vote
1 answer

Presymplectic vector space and symplectic subspaces

Let $(V,\omega)$ be a finite dimensional presymplectic vector space and $W, U$ be symplectic subspaces. Is then $span(W,U)=\{z\in V|\exists u\in U, w \in W: z=w+u \}$ also a symplectic subspace ?
Jan D
  • 33
1
vote
1 answer

Question on constructing a smplectomorphism between $(V,\omega)$ and $(Y \oplus Y^*,\omega_0)$ where $Y$ is lagrangian

This is exercise 9, p.8 in Lectures on Symplectic Geometry by Ana Cannas da Silva. Let $(V,\omega)$ be a symplectic vector space and $Y$ a lagrangian subspace of $V$, i.e. $Y = Y^\omega$. On $Y \oplus Y^*$ define $$\omega_0(u…
TheGeekGreek
  • 7,869
1
vote
2 answers

Passage in proving lagrangian subspaces have lagrangian complements

The starting point is a $2n$-dimensional symplectic vector space $(E,\sigma)$ and a lagrangian subspace $L\leq E$. In order to show there exists a lagrangian $M\leq E$ satisfying $E=M\oplus L$, we first pick an isotropic $M\leq E:M\cap L=\{0\}$ and…
MickG
  • 8,645
0
votes
1 answer

Is sum of two symplectic subspaces symplectic?

Consider a symplectic vector space $(\mathbb{R}^{2n}, \omega_0)$ with standard symplectic form $\omega_0$ defined by: $$\omega_0(x,y) = xJ_0y^T$$ where $J_0=\begin{pmatrix} 0 & I_n \\ -I_n & 0 \end{pmatrix}$. Let $W_1, W_2$ be symplectic subspaces…
Uncool
  • 940
0
votes
1 answer

Normal Form Theorem for Skew Symmetric Forms

This is a theorem mentioned in Hansjorg Geiges' Symplectic Geometry book while proving Darboux's theorem for local realisation of a contact form on a manifold $M^{2n+1}$ (see $\S2.5.1$ p.67) I haven't seen this theorem in any textbook or on the net.…
Karthik C
  • 2,581
0
votes
1 answer

Antisymmetric Bilinear Forms

What would be an antisymmetric bilinear form on $\mathbb{R^{4}}$ that cannot be written as a wedge product of two covectors? Also, what would be a $4\times4$ skew-symmetric matrix of rank $4$? Finally, how would I show that every antisymmetric…
Nick
  • 625