Questions tagged [laplacian]

The properties of the Laplace differential operator, denoted $\Delta$ or $\nabla^2$, and defined as the divergence of the gradient. For Laplace equation, see (harmonic-functions)

Laplacian Operator is a derivative operator which is used to find edges in an image.

Mathematically, the Laplacian operator is defined as: $$\nabla^2 \equiv \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial z^2}$$

  • The Laplacian is a scalar operator. If it is applied to a scalar field, it generates a scalar field.

  • If the scalar Laplacian operator is applied to a vector field, it acts on each component in turn and generates a vector field.

Note that the operator $~\nabla ^2~$ is commonly written as $~\Delta~$ by mathematicians.

Differences with other operators:

The major difference between Laplacian and other operators like Prewitt, Sobel, Robinson and Kirsch is that these all are first order derivative masks but Laplacian is a second order derivative mask. Another difference between Laplacian and other operators is that unlike other operators Laplacian didn’t take out edges in any particular direction but it take out edges in following classification.

$1.\quad$ Inward Edges $\qquad$ $2.\quad$ Outward Edges

Applications:

The Laplacian is extremely important in mechanics, electromagnetics, wave theory, and quantum mechanics, and appears in

$1.\quad$ Laplace's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi=0$$

$2.\quad$ The Helmholtz differential equation$$\nabla^2 \phi+k^2 \phi=0$$

$3.\quad $ The wave equation$$\nabla^2 \phi=\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial t^2}$$

$4.\quad$ The Schrödinger equation$$i \hbar \frac{\partial }{\partial t}\psi(x,y,z,t)=\left[-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2+V(x)\right]\psi(x,y,z,t)$$

Laplacian, Various Coordinates :

$1.\quad$ In rectangular coordinates $~(x,y,z)~$: $$\nabla^2\equiv \nabla \cdot \nabla \equiv \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial z^2}$$

$2.\quad$ In cylindrical polar coordinates $~(r,\theta,z)~$:$$\nabla^2\equiv \frac{\partial^2}{\partial r^2}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}+\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial \theta^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial z^2}$$

$3.\quad$ In spherical polar coordinates $~(r,\theta,\phi)~$:$$\nabla^2\equiv \frac{\partial^2}{\partial r^2}+\frac{2}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}+\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial \theta^2}+\frac{\cos \theta}{r^2\sin \theta}\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}+\frac{1}{r^2\sin^2\theta}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial \phi^2}$$

Note: This tag is also for questions concerning the properties, such as self-adjointness, compactness of inverse, and spectral structure of the Laplace differential operator. The operator, denoted $\Delta$ or $\nabla^2$, is defined as the divergence of the gradient, and generalized to the Laplace-Beltrami and Laplace-deRham operators.

References:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace_operator

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Laplacian.html

https://nptel.ac.in/courses/115101005/downloads/lectures-doc/Lecture-5.pdf

1243 questions
11
votes
1 answer

Why is Laplacian ubiquitous?

What I am asking here is a moral question. Mathematically moral, don't bother physics. I mean, Euler's number is ubiquitous because, among all the exponentials, it alone is its own derivative with all the consequences we know. I know that the…
Zappa
  • 183
3
votes
2 answers

Intuition for the laplacian equation

I studied about the Laplacian at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EW08rD-GFh0 and I understand that it can be thought of as the second order derivative test where the value $ \triangle f(x,y) $ will be high at a local minima and low at a local…
Kong
  • 884
2
votes
1 answer

Integrating a Laplacian

I want to show that $$\int_\mathbb{R^n} \nabla^2\phi \mathrm{d}^nx = 0$$ provided $\nabla \phi(\mathbf{x},t) \rightarrow 0$ as $|\mathbf{x}| \rightarrow \infty$. I have thought of maybe expanding the Laplacian but I have no idea how to evaluate…
Robert S
  • 1,144
2
votes
0 answers

If $\Delta u \geq 0$, then $u$ attains its maximum in the boundary $\partial \Omega$

Let $\Omega \subset \mathbb R^n$ a bounded set and let $u \in C^2(\Omega) \cap C(\overline\Omega)$ be a real-valued function. I need a hint to proof that if the laplacian $\Delta u \geq 0$, then $u$ attains its maximum in the boundary $\partial…
user 242964
  • 1,898
2
votes
1 answer

Find the solution to the following equation

The Laplacian is differential operator defined by $$\Delta U=\sum^n_{i=1} \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2 _i}$$ Find at least one solution to $$-\Delta u(x)=u(x)$$ How do I solve this equation? The solution says $$u(x) = c1 cos x + c2 sin x$$ but…
user204450
1
vote
1 answer

laplacian solution

If I have $-\Delta u \ge 0$ and in $\Omega$ and $u=0$ on the boundary. and I have proved that $u=0$ is one of the solutions and I want to prove it's the only solution. based on the information on the question I can say $u \ge 0$ can I use strong…
1
vote
1 answer

Computing Laplacian of $ (Bx)\cdot x$

Could you help me and tell me how I should find the $\Delta((Bx) \cdot x)$ if $B \in \mathbb{R}^{N\times N}$ and $x \in \mathbb{R}^N$ ? All I can think of is writing $\Delta((Bx) \cdot x)= \operatorname{div}(D(Bx \cdot x))$. The final answer is…
1
vote
0 answers

uniqueness of solutions for laplace equation

I know that the solutions to the Laplace equation $\triangle u=0$ are unique but in some cases one can find that there is more than 1 solution. For example $u=0$ and ln$|\textbf{x}|$ are both solutions to $\triangle u=0, u=0$ on $|\textbf{x}|=1$.…
dan
  • 69
1
vote
0 answers

Laplacian of an integral on manifold equals zero

Let $\Omega \subseteq \mathbb R^3$ be a connected, open, and bounded set, and let $\Gamma = \partial \Omega$. Let $\sigma \in C^1(\mathbb R^3)$, $\sigma \geq 0$. Consider the integral $$\phi(x) = \int_\Gamma \frac{\sigma(y) dS(y)}{|x-y|}.$$ Show…
dnes
  • 426
1
vote
1 answer

Laplacian of viscosity kernel function (Müller SPH)

I'm studying Müller's paper about Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH). To compute fluid viscosity, the following kernel function is proposed (paragraph 3.5, eq. 22): $$W_{viscosity}(\mathbf{r}, h)=\frac{15}{2\pi…
1
vote
2 answers

How was the 2D discrete Laplacian matrix calculated?

If I convolute a 2D signal with the L4 kernel, I get the discrete Laplacian. But how was the L4 kernel calculated? Wikipedia isn't very clear on this and I haven't found other…
Pexan
  • 13
1
vote
2 answers

What's $\nabla \cdot [k \cdot \nabla T]$ formulation in Laplace's eq. really?

What's $\nabla \cdot [k \cdot \nabla T]$ formulation in Laplace's eq. really? (https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Introduction_to_finite_elements/Weak_form_of_heat_equation) I read that this is like $$\left(\frac{d}{dx_1}, \frac{d}{dx_2}, ...\right)…
mavavilj
  • 7,270
1
vote
2 answers

demonstration of vector laplacian in cartesian coordinates

I am stucked with the following demonstration. The vector laplacian formula is: $Δa = ∇(∇a) - ∇×(∇×a)$ , where $a$ is a vector field. I have to demonstrate that the vector laplacian in cartesian coordinates is: $Δa = (∇∇ax)ux +(∇∇ay)uy +(∇∇az)uz$…
victor26567
  • 111
  • 3
1
vote
0 answers

how to construct the 2D finite-difference representation of Laplacian by Matlab

I've been trying to solve the following Schrodinger equation numerically, \begin{equation} \begin{split} \frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial y^2} + U(x,y) \psi =E \psi \\ U(x,y) =cos(x)cos(y) \\ …
0
votes
0 answers

Understanding the definition of the $p-$Laplacian

Is the $p-$Laplacian defined in case of a vanishing first derivative, that is $Df(x)=0$ in $x\in\mathbb{R}^n$ for some smooth $f$? In case of $p\geq 2$ it should, but for $p<2$ I am not sure as to how to this would be defined. If $p\geq2$ it should…
1
2