Questions tagged [constructive-mathematics]

The term "constructive mathematics" refers to the discipline in mathematics in which one proves the existence of mathematical objects only by presenting a construction that provides such an object. Indirect proofs involving proof by contradiction and law of excluded middle are considered nonconstructive. Constructivism is the philosophical stance that the only "true" mathematics is constructive mathematics.

The term "constructive mathematics" refers to the discipline in mathematics in which one proves the existence of mathematical objects only by presenting a construction that provides such an object. Indirect proofs involving proof by contradiction are considered nonconstructive. Construvtivism is the philosophical stance that the only "true" mathematics as constructive mathematics.

In constructivism, an existence proof is not accepted, unless the object in question is constructed. As an example of a nonconstructive proof, consider the following classical proof of the fact that there are irrational numbers $ a $ and $ b $ such that $ a ^ b $ is rational:

Either $ { \sqrt 2 } ^ { \sqrt 2 } $ is rational, in which case we take $ a = b = \sqrt 2 $; or else $ { \sqrt 2 } ^ { \sqrt 2 } $ is irrational, in which case we take $ a = { \sqrt 2 } ^ { \sqrt 2 } $ and $ b = \sqrt 2 $.

The above argument is nonconstructive, because as it stands, it does not enable us to pinpoint which of the two choices of the pair $ ( a , b ) $ has the required property. An alternative proof for the same theorem which is constructive, goes like:

Take $ a = \sqrt 2 $ and $ b = \log _ 2 9 $.

Also, the law of excluded middle is typically not accepted as an axiom. That's because it can result in nonconstructive reasoning, as the above example illustrates. Therefore classical logic is rejected by constructivists, and instead they use intuitionistic logic, which is essentially classical logic without the law of the excluded middle. There are also mathematical axioms like the axiom of choice rejected by constructivists, as they have nonconstructive consequences.

As some of classical methods are not constructively valid, there are classically valid sentences that don't have constructive proofs. As an example there is no constructive proof for the following sentence:

For every real number $ x $, either $ x < 0 $, $ x = 0 $ or $ x > 0 $.

There is a suitable replacement for this which is constrcutively valid. In many applications this alternative is sufficient, although it's slightly weaker than the classical sentence:

For every real number $ x $ and every positive real number $ \epsilon $, either $ x < 0 $, $ | x | < \epsilon $ or $ x > 0 $.

Constructivism has different varieties, among which the most famous are:

  1. , a formal basis for the theory of intuitionism founded by L. E. J. Brouwer
  2. Recursive constructive mathematics, a.k.a russian construve mathematics, founded by A. A. Markov
  3. Bishop's constructive mathematics, founded by E. Bishop
576 questions
8
votes
1 answer

Is $\sqrt{2}^{2\log_2 3} = 3$ a constructive solution?

$\sqrt{2}^{2\log_2 3} = 3$ is a solution to Can an irrational number raised to an irrational power be rational? While the famous $\sqrt{2}^{\sqrt{2}}$ proof is nonconstructive, this one is apparently constructive. However, it is not clear to me that…
Monday
  • 83
8
votes
1 answer

Suppose $X \cong X \times X$ with at least two elements. Can we construct a third element?

Let $a,b \in X$ be distinct and suppose $\langle -,- \rangle : X^2 \rightarrow X$ is a bijection (thought of as a pairing function, with $\pi_1,\pi_2 : X \rightarrow X$ satisfying $\pi_1\langle x,y\rangle = x$, $\pi_2\langle x,y\rangle = y$). …
5
votes
0 answers

How much of the Cantor-Schröder-Bernstein theorem is constructively recoverable if the injections have retractions and decidable images?

I have also cross-posted this question to MO, where it has now been answered. Suppose we have $f : A \to B$ and $g : B \to A$, as well as left inverses $f_r : B \to A$ of $f$ and $g_r : A \to B$ of $g$. Suppose further that $f$ and $g$ have…
sarahzrf
  • 453
5
votes
1 answer

"Two" definitions of injectivity on constructive mathematics

In classical mathematics, following two statements are equivalent: If $f(x) = f(y)$ then $x = y$ for each $x$ and $y$. If $x\neq y$ then $f(x)\neq f(y)$ for each $x$ and $y$. However, in a constructive sense, they could not be equivalent.…
Hanul Jeon
  • 27,376
4
votes
1 answer

confused by nonconstructive equivalence relations

I was reading "constructive analysis" by Bishop and right on page 15 he writes "The relation of equality given above for rational numbers is an equivalence relation. In this example there is a finite, mechanical procedure for deciding whether or not…
Jello
  • 103
4
votes
3 answers

Question about Bishop's "constructive analysis" for people familiar with bishop style constructive analysis only

It has been a while since i read Bishop's book "constructive analysis", recently I dug it out of my book shelve and started to read. I came around this observation on the top of page 85. "A subset Y of $\mathbb{R}$ can be bounded as a metric space…
user858102
4
votes
1 answer

Do either of Markov's Principle and the Fan Theorem imply the other?

To be concrete: Let's define Markov's Principle as $$\forall P \subseteq \mathbb N, (\forall n \in \mathbb N, n \in P \vee n \notin P) \to \neg(\forall n \in \mathbb N, n \notin P) \to \exists n \in \mathbb N, n \in P$$ and the Fan Theorem as stated…
sarahzrf
  • 453
3
votes
1 answer

Is this proof constructive?

I found the following proof to be constructive: There is a bijection from $[0,1]$ to $(0,1]$. Have $0\mapsto \frac12, \frac12\mapsto\frac23,\frac23\mapsto\frac34,$ and so on. That takes care of $\left\{0, \frac12, \frac23,…
Hayatsu
  • 363
3
votes
1 answer

Correct constructive proof of $0 \leq x < 1/n$, $\forall n \in \mathbb{N} \implies x = 0$.

I've set out to prove $$0 \leq x < 1/n, \ \forall n \in \mathbb{N} \implies x = 0$$ constructively. I will be using the construction of the real numbers given in Bishop's Constructive Analysis. Bishop defines a real number $x$ to be a regular…
ToucanIan
  • 209
3
votes
4 answers

What does constructive mathematics say about limits?

Suppose I want to construct a mathematical proof using constructive mathematics. Let's say I've reached a proof statement where I've shown that, say, x = 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ..., whereupon I would like to introduce the proposition, x = 1. Clearly,…
3
votes
0 answers

Why are the Real Numbers indecomposable according to Wikipedia?

Wikipedia claims that It follows from the indecomposability principle that any property of real numbers that is decided (each real number either has or does not have that property) is in fact trivial (either all the real numbers have that property,…
JMC
  • 249
3
votes
0 answers

Classical Hahn Banach

Let $P_n := \{ p \in \mathbb{R}^n : p_i > 0 \wedge p_1+...+p_n =1 \}$. Let $A \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times n}$. S1: $\exists \xi \in \mathbb{R}^{1 \times m} : \xi A > 0 \Leftrightarrow \neg \exists p \in P_n : Ap =0$. Hahn-Banach: Every nonzero…
user397268
2
votes
0 answers

Are there constructively defined bump functions?

I am looking for a function $f:\mathbb{R} \to\mathbb{R}$ that is $C^\infty$, that equals zero when $|x| \geq 1$, that is strictly positive when $|x|< 1$ and that is constructively defined. Those functions are heavily used in differential geometry…
V. Semeria
  • 1,279
2
votes
1 answer

How do working constructivists get by with out the zero product property?

It is stated by Douglas Bridges in Constructive mathematics: a foundation for computable analysis that the following property, which I will call the zero product property: If $x,y \in \mathbb{R}$ and $xy = 0$, then $x = 0$ or $y = 0$. is equivalent…
ToucanIan
  • 209
2
votes
2 answers

constructive proof that $\mathbb{R}$ is an integral domain?

Can it constructively be shown that for all $x,y \in \mathbb{R}$, $xy = 0 \rightarrow x = 0 \vee y = 0$? e: The reason that I am interested in this is that I recall hearing something about how the roots of polynomials in a constructive setting…
1
2 3