this is a standard matter. I hope you've worked out a conjecture first by using a computer programme or just plugging in some numbers on the formula. (You should, as it is a healthy thing).
Either you continue as you started (continuous variable $t$), and write your limit as
$$\frac{log(t)}{1/t},$$ (i.e. a quotient of infinities) and apply whichever result you please to your newly-found indeterminate limit (L'Hopital), or you can use a standard result on sequences.
I suggest e.g. D'Alembert's Criterion or the Quotient Criterion (look up Apostol's Calculus, for instance, its chapter on sequences). (Stoltz's theorem also works).
A nicer way, which can accompany you for the rest of your life, is as follows.
Consider $1+x_n=n^{1/n},$ and write the identity
$$n=(1+x_n)^n.$$
You can use Newton's binomial theorem here, and establish (choosing your favourite term, I'll choose the degree-2 term) that, for instance,
$$n> \frac{n(n-1)}{2} x_n^2 \geq 0.$$
After isolating, you'll see immediately what the expected result is.
Your sequence is very much related to this one.
There are many resources available online, e.g.
http://planetmath.org/proofoflimitofnthrootofn
REGARDING POLYNOMIALS AND EXPONENTIALS: Actually, there are recipes such as this one: the exponential always beats a polynomial, or a power of $x$, as $x\to +\infty.$ The argument would be very similar. Say, you want to show that, for $a>1$,
$$\frac{a^x}{x^p}$$ tends to infinity; you may restrict to $x=n$, and then compare (write $a=1+b$, for $b>0$)
$$(1+b)^n= 1 + nb + \cdots + \frac{n(n-1)\ldots (n-p+1)}{(p+1)!} b^{p+1} + \cdots,$$ which clearly is bigger than $n^p$, for $n \to \infty$.
I leave it as an exercise for you to see what happens as $x\to +\infty$ (take the integer part $n=n(x)$ of $x$, and bound numerator and denominator appropriately comparing $f(x)$ to $f(n)$).