I would like to point out that there is an approximation that is good
to an amazing $24$ digits of the value of the sum for $q=1/2$ that can
be obtained using harmonic summation techniques.
Introduce the sum
$$S(x) = \sum_{n\ge 1} \frac{1}{n}\frac{1}{2^{nx}-1}$$
so that we are interested in $S(1).$
The sum term is harmonic and may be evaluated by inverting its Mellin
transform.
Recall the harmonic sum identity
$$\mathfrak{M}\left(\sum_{k\ge 1} \lambda_k g(\mu_k x);s\right) =
\left(\sum_{k\ge 1} \frac{\lambda_k}{\mu_k^s} \right) g^*(s)$$
where $g^*(s)$ is the Mellin transform of $g(x).$
In the present case we have
$$\lambda_k = \frac{1}{k}, \quad \mu_k = k
\quad \text{and} \quad
g(x) = \frac{1}{2^x-1}.$$
We need the Mellin transform $g^*(s)$ of $g(x)$ which is
$$\int_0^\infty \frac{2^{-x}}{1-2^{-x}} x^{s-1} dx
= \int_0^\infty \sum_{q\ge 1} e^{-(\log 2)q x} x^{s-1} dx
\\= \Gamma(s) \frac{1}{(\log 2)^s} \sum_{q\ge 1} \frac{1}{q^s}
= \frac{1}{(\log 2)^s} \Gamma(s) \zeta(s).$$
Since $1/(2^x-1)\sim 1/x/\log(2)$ in a neighborhood of zero and
$1/(2^x-1)\sim 2^{-x}$ at infinity we have that the fundamental strip
of this transform is $\langle 1, \infty\rangle.$
It follows that the Mellin transform $Q(s)$ of the harmonic sum
$S(x)$ is given by
$$Q(s) = \frac{1}{(\log 2)^s} \Gamma(s) \zeta(s) \zeta(s+1)
\\ \text{because}\quad
\sum_{k\ge 1} \frac{\lambda_k}{\mu_k^s} =
\sum_{k\ge 1} \frac{1}{k} \frac{1}{k^s} =
\sum_{k\ge 1} \frac{1}{k^{s+1}}
= \zeta(s+1)$$
for $\Re(s) > 0.$
The Mellin inversion integral here is $$\frac{1}{2\pi i}
\int_{3/2-i\infty}^{3/2+i\infty} Q(s)/x^s ds$$ which we evaluate by
shifting it to the left for an expansion about zero where the line is
chosen in the intersection of the fundamental strip of the transform
with the half-plane of convergence of the harmonic factor that
multiplies $g^*(s).$
We now compute the inversion integral. Fortunately this calculation is
very simple since the trivial zeros of the two zeta function terms
together cancel the poles of the gamma function term. What remains is
just three residues.
They are:
$$\mathrm{Res}(Q(s)/x^s; s=1) =
\frac{\pi^2}{6} \frac{1}{x \log 2},$$
$$\mathrm{Res}(Q(s)/x^s; s=0) =
-\frac{1}{2}\log(2\pi) +
\frac{1}{2} \log\log 2 +
\frac{1}{2} \log x$$
and finally
$$\mathrm{Res}(Q(s)/x^s; s=-1) =
-\frac{1}{24} x \log 2.$$
Setting $x=1$ we obtain the following approximation of $S(1):$
$$\frac{\pi^2}{6\log 2}
-\frac{1}{2}\log(2\pi) +
\frac{1}{2} \log\log 2
-\frac{1}{24}\log 2$$
which is
$$\frac{\pi^2}{6\log 2}
-\frac{1}{2}\log\pi +
\frac{1}{2} \log\log 2
-\frac{13}{24}\log 2.$$
This gives the value
$$1.24206209481241494579784529798$$
while the exact value is
$$1.24206209481241494579784548189$$
so the approximation is good to $24$ digits the difference being
$$-{ 1.83904\times 10^{-25}}.$$
This MSE link contains a calculation in the same spirit, but somewhat more advanced.
With it, I discovered that
exp of my original series is just the inverse of the generating function for the partition function. I discovered a little more than this too, and it involves dirichlet products with the mobius function to discover infinite products like the one above.
– six Jul 20 '14 at 20:35