7

Is $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3}]$ integrally closed? (Or could it have a relation to another domain like $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$ does with $\mathbb{Z}[\omega]$?) Also, is it UFD? What are its units?

I have never read about this domain in any book, though i did read try to read one book with very general techniques that could theoretically be applied here.

reason I even known about this domain is because their was a question on this website last month asking if it was closed under multiplication. A lot of people fell into the trap of thinking that its quadratic but its not, myself included. Their was a whole bunch of snarky comments from people who know its quartic (is that the right term? not quadratic but only one person explained the difference -- he did a great job answering the question and explaining the misconception, and maybe from his answer one can derive the answers to the questions I'm asking today, but I'm not sure how if that's the case.

user26857
  • 52,094
  • 1
    Check the discriminant of the lattice to see if it matches the field discriminant. – Adam Hughes Jul 07 '14 at 20:50
  • The other question: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/848782/is-mathbbz-sqrt2-sqrt3-closed-under-multiplication –  Jul 07 '14 at 20:55
  • 1
    Hate to be a spelling nazi, but come on, there are like 100 typos above. Its a good practice to read through your post before posting so that you catch some of them. – Winther Jul 07 '14 at 20:56
  • ,sorry I get confused becuase the system marks some of the tex as spelling errors... –  Jul 07 '14 at 21:03
  • 3
    It’s likely that OP is not a native speaker of English. We have to be more tolerant. – Lubin Jul 07 '14 at 21:05
  • @Lubin I think it's more likely that he is a native speaker. – Lisa Jul 07 '14 at 21:25
  • Yeah, I'm a native speaker and Im' a lousy speller. sorry... –  Jul 11 '14 at 19:07

3 Answers3

5

Interestingly enough this is not integrally closed. (spelling not corrected)

We determine the rings of integers of $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}]$ and $\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3}]$

We prove first that

$$a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6} \in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}]$$ if and only if $b$ and $c$ have the same parity and $d$ is even.

An additive basis is given by, $\{1,\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}, 2\sqrt{2}, 2\sqrt{6}\}$. We show this as follows,

$(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3})^2=5+2\sqrt{6}$ so $2\sqrt{6} \in\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}]$ this gives on multiplying $2\sqrt{6}$ by the original expression we have

$$6\sqrt{2} +4\sqrt{3}\in\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}]$$ from which we can easily get $2\sqrt{2}, 2\sqrt{3} \in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}]$.

Next,

$$(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3})^3=11\sqrt{2}+9\sqrt{3}.$$

Now noting that $2\sqrt{3}=2(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3})-2\sqrt{2}$ we see that $1,(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}),(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3})^2,(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3})^3$ are all expressed in terms of these our basis.

From which we easily deduce the claim.

Now let us determine the ring of integers of $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3})$

Since we have automorphisms such as $\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3} \mapsto -\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3}$ and $\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3} \mapsto \sqrt{2},-\sqrt{3}$ and $\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3} \mapsto -\sqrt{2},-\sqrt{3}$ It is easily seen that any algebraic integer has the form

$$\frac{a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6}}{2}.$$

If we write this as $\frac{\alpha+\beta\sqrt{3}}{2}$ and take its norm over $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})$ we get an algebraic integer in $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})$ and we know the integers here are of the form $n+m\sqrt{2}$, $n,m \in \mathbb{Z}$. Skipping the details of the calculation we find $4|a^2+c^2+2(b^2+d^2)$ and $2|ab+cd$ from which a little simple number theory gives that $a$ and $c$ are even and $b$ and $d$ have the same parity.

Thus we see that the integers in $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3})$ have the form

$$a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\frac{\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{6}}{2}.$$
It remains to check that this last is in fact algebraic integer. So let $$\alpha=\frac{\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{6}}{2}\in \mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3}]$$ then

$$\alpha^2=2+\sqrt{3}$$ therefore

$$(\alpha-2)^2=3$$ so

$$\alpha^4-4\alpha^2+1=0$$

so $\alpha$ is an algebraic integer.

Note that this shows that $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3}]$ is not integrally closed.

3

The full set of $\mathbb Q$-conjugates of $\alpha=\sqrt2+\sqrt3$ is the set $\{\pm\sqrt2\pm\sqrt3\}$, and so you see that the minimal $\mathbb Q$-polynomial for $\alpha$ is $X^4-10X^2+1$. Continuing, you easily see that $1/\alpha=-\sqrt2+\sqrt3$, while the minimal polynomial for $\alpha$ also shows that $1/\alpha=10\alpha-\alpha^3$. Since $\sqrt3=\frac12(\alpha+1/\alpha)$, you see that $\sqrt3=\frac92\alpha-\frac12\alpha^3$, so that $\sqrt3$ is not in $\mathbb Z[\alpha]$.

Lubin
  • 62,818
  • I didn’t say anything about units, but in view of the fact that the ring isn’t integrally closed, I for one find this question less interesting. Others will probably disagree. – Lubin Jul 07 '14 at 21:56
  • 2
    That's a self-fulfilling prophecy. Now I and others will be looking at your answer with a fine-tooth comb to see if it gives any hints as to the question of units. – Robert Soupe Jul 08 '14 at 03:04
  • 3
    The units of the full ring of integers of the field have the form ${\pm1}$ plus a free $\mathbb Z$-module of rank $3$. And we know, from the quadratic subfields, three independent units, namely $\sqrt2-1$, $2-\sqrt3$, and $5-2\sqrt6$. The group spanned by these three thus has to be of finite index in the full group of units, but I have no idea what that index is, nor how to find a genuine basis. Same goes for the non-integrally closed subring, but in spades. – Lubin Jul 08 '14 at 03:47
1

Hint $\,\ \alpha = \sqrt 2 + \sqrt 3\ \Rightarrow\ \dfrac{\alpha^2-1}2\, =\, 2+\sqrt 6$

Bill Dubuque
  • 272,048