2

If a commutative ring $R$ with $1$ is finitely generated over $\mathbb Z$ could one deduce that the Jacobson radical of $R$ is nilpotent?

I am aware of the well-known fact that when $R$ is artinian, the Jacobson radical of $R$ is the unique nilpotent ideal of $R$, but here we are not sure of artinianness of $R$. Thanks in advance for any cooperation!

user26857
  • 52,094
karparvar
  • 5,730
  • 1
  • 14
  • 36

1 Answers1

5

Definition: A ring is Jacobson if every prime ideal is an intersection of maximal ideals.

Theorem (Nullstellensatz): Let $R$ be a Jacobson ring. Then every finitely generated $R$-algebra is Jacobson.

Since $\mathbb{Z}$ is Jacobson (as every nonzero prime is maximal, and $0$ is the intersection of any infinite set of maximal ideals), this shows that any finitely generated ring over $\mathbb{Z}$ is Jacobson. But in a Jacobson ring, the Jacobson radical and nilradical coincide (by definition). Finally, any finitely generated ring over $\mathbb{Z}$ is also Noetherian (by Hilbert's Basis Theorem) and in a Noetherian ring, the nilradical is nilpotent.

zcn
  • 15,640
  • Thanks a lot! Now, if $R$ is finitely generated over a field $K$, is it true that yet the Jacobson radical and nilradical are the same? – karparvar Jun 11 '14 at 03:55
  • Yes, by the same reasoning, since a field is also Jacobson – zcn Jun 11 '14 at 03:58