0

Why $\lim_{x->0}log(x^x)=0$ ?. This means $0^0=1$?

For WolframAlpha $\lim_{x->0}log(x^x)=0$ but $0^0$ is not defined.

user68061
  • 3,827
Wyvern666
  • 911
  • $x\to0$ does not mean $x=0$ Here in fact, $x\to0^+$ – lab bhattacharjee May 24 '14 at 06:14
  • What's the downvote for? Seems like a valid question to me. – IAmNoOne May 24 '14 at 06:24
  • 1
    Again the Power Less Monster ? http://fr.scribd.com/doc/14709220/Zero-puissance-zero-Zero-to-the-Zeroth-Power – JJacquelin May 24 '14 at 06:30
  • 1
    As we see,
    $lon(x^x)=xlogx$.
    $0^0$ is not defined,
    $lim_{x\rightarrow0}log(x^x)=0$ is because of that $f(x)=x$ converges faster than $g(x)=\frac{1}{log(x)}$ at the point (0,0).
    As we knew $\frac{1}{log(x)}log(x)=1$,so,when $x\rightarrow0$, $f(x)g(x)=o(1)$. That is to say $lim_{x\rightarrow0}log(x^x)=0$.
    – user152441 May 24 '14 at 06:40

1 Answers1

1

In some calculations $0^0 = 1$. However that does not seem logical, because for example:

  • $2^{-2} = 0.25; 0^{-2} = 0$
  • $2^{-1} = 0.5; 0^{-1} = 0$
  • $2^0 = 2^{-1} * 2 = 1; 0^0 = 0^{-1} * 0 = 0 ?!?!$

From these calculations we "know" that $0^0 = 0$. But $x \in \mathbb{R} \implies x^0 = 1$ ! And that's why the $0^0$ is undefined: because it has more than one value and breaks algebra with $0 = 1$...