7

I found the following statement on Wikipedia :

"Henri Lebesgue proved that (for functions on the unit interval) each Baire class of a countable ordinal number contains functions not in any smaller class, and that there exist functions which are not in any Baire class."

I know that any non-measurable function can't be a member of any Baire class. But a proof of this kind requires the axiom of choice (for existence of a non-measurable set).

Did Lebesgue use AC in his proof? If not can anyone provide an example of a measurable function that is not in any Baire class?

(Or was Lebesgue's proof not constructive?)

ADDED: On Wolfram I found the following statement:

Lebesgue showed that each of the Baire classes is nonempty and that there are (Lebesgue-) measurable functions that are not Baire functions (Kleiner 1989).

So now the question winds down to: Can anyone give a sketch of a proof for this? or better yet an example of such a function?

Saal Hardali
  • 4,759

1 Answers1

1

Turns out it's simpler than i previously thought.

The Borel functions coincide with the Baire functions (on suitable topological spaces).

So any indicator function of a Lebesgue measurable set that is not Borel measurable will do.

Saal Hardali
  • 4,759