-1

Most of us who are studying mathematics are familiar with the famous $e^{ix}=cos(x)+isin(x)$. Why is it that we have $e^{ix}=cos(x)+isin(x)$ and not $e^{ix}=sin(x)+icos(x)$? I haven't studied Complex Analysis to know the answer to this question. It pops up in Linear Algebra, Differential Equations, Multivariable Equations and many other fields. But I feel like textbooks and teachers just expect us students to take it as given without explaining it to a certain extent. I also couldn't find any good article that explains this.

  • 1
    http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EulerFormula.html – lab bhattacharjee Apr 15 '14 at 04:49
  • 1
    Taylor-expand $\sin x$, $\cos x$, and $e^{ix}$. Then it will be clear. – David Zhang Apr 15 '14 at 04:50
  • 7
    You expect $e^0$ to be $i$? – anon Apr 15 '14 at 04:51
  • Also thinking about when you graph complex numbers, you put imaginary numbers on the y-axis and real numbers on the x-axis – Sidd Singal Apr 15 '14 at 05:26
  • I feel like you guys don't know the answer to this question either to the point where you can explain it as if your explaining (intuitively) to a child. But I don't mean to offend anyone. – Eames Cobb Apr 15 '14 at 06:05
  • The best explanation I've seen goes that since the derivative of $e^{ix}$ is $ie^{ix}$, we have a curve which starts at $1$ and has a "velocity vector" always orthogonal to itself, pointing left, and of magnitude $1$. So naturally, it draws a circle. But I don't know how to make this rigorous. – Jack M Apr 15 '14 at 06:34
  • @HansLundmark I don't see how the question I asked in any way resembles the one you put up as a duplicate. – Eames Cobb Apr 15 '14 at 06:42
  • Do you specifically want to know why the imaginary part isn't $\cos$? – Jack M Apr 15 '14 at 06:43
  • 1
    Your question is "Why is $e^{ix} = \cos x+i\sin x$?" Hans's linked question is "How to prove that $e^{it} = \cos t+i\sin t$?" I don't see how you fail to see at least a passing resemblance. –  Apr 15 '14 at 06:45
  • Right. I was simply asking why its the $sinx$ portion that is lucky enough to be stuck with $i$ and not the $cosx$ portion. Nothing more. Maybe i'm not seeing something that is obvious. – Eames Cobb Apr 15 '14 at 06:45
  • @EamesCobb Do you at least understand why the trig functions turn up here in the first place? – Jack M Apr 15 '14 at 06:49
  • 1
    @EamesCobb If the question is really: "I already understand that either $e^{iz} = \cos(z) + i \sin(z)$ or $e^{iz} = \sin(z) + i \cos(z)$. Which one is it and why?", then just plug in $z = 0$. – Magdiragdag Apr 15 '14 at 06:54
  • @EamesCobb: Obviously, if you understand why the formula looks like it does (i.e., if you know how to prove it), then you would understand why it doesn't look the other way. And if you look at the answers given here below, you will see that they are much the same as the answers to the old question... – Hans Lundmark Apr 15 '14 at 07:43

2 Answers2

2

The way I make sense of it is to consider the McLaurin expansions of $e^{ix}$, $\cos(x)$, and $\sin(x)$.

Note:

$$e^{x} = \sum^{\infty}_{n=0} \frac{x^n}{n!} = 1 + x + \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^3}{3!} + \cdots$$

$$\sin x = \sum^{\infty}_{n=0} \frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)!} x^{2n+1} = x - \frac{x^3}{3!} + \frac{x^5}{5!} - \cdots$$

$$\cos x = \sum^{\infty}_{n=0} \frac{(-1)^n}{(2n)!} x^{2n} = 1 - \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^4}{4!} - \cdots$$

Kaj Hansen
  • 33,011
0

Let $y=ix$. Then the Maclaurin series of $e^{y}$ is: $$ \begin{eqnarray} e^y=e^{ix}&=&\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(ix)^n}{n!}\\ &=& 1+ix-\frac{x^2}{2!}-i\frac{x^3}{3!}+\frac{x^4}{4!}+i\frac{x^5}{5!}\ldots\\ &=& \Big(1-\frac{x^2}{2!}+\frac{x^4}{4!}-\ldots\Big)+i\Big(x-\frac{x^3}{3!}+\frac{x^5}{5!}-\ldots\Big)\\ &=& \Big(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^n\frac{x^{2n}}{(2n)!}\Big)+i\Big(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^n\frac{x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}\Big)\\ &=&\cos x+i\sin x \end{eqnarray} $$ Hence $\sin x$ is the imaginary part of $e^{ix}$.

meep
  • 1
  • 1
    Not to be rude, but what does this add that wasn't contained in the other answer? – Jack M Apr 15 '14 at 06:37
  • I had just signed up to stack exchange and this was my very first post, so I was just testing the markdown. – meep Apr 15 '14 at 06:46