3

enter image description here

I'm having problems understanding why $$ \frac{d}{dx} \int_{a}^{x} f(t)\,dt = f(x)$$

I'm somewhat weirded out by the fact that there is a $dt$ at the end of $$F(x) = \int_a^x f(t)\,dt$$ too.

We are differentiating with respect to $x$...I understand that $ \frac{d}{dx} \int f(x) \, dx = f(x)$ but why is the $t$ in the definition?

Paze
  • 1,956
  • 1
    "t" is a "dummy" variable representing the integration. And the integral says you are integrating the function from a up to x. Stare at the last equation you wrote and you'll see it makes little sense. – Aloizio Macedo Mar 15 '14 at 16:58
  • $\int_a^x f(t)dt$ is the antiderivative of $f$ which vanish at $x=a$ so its derivative is obviously $f(x)$. –  Mar 15 '14 at 16:58
  • I'm having problems understanding how we're playing with the upper and lower limits to evaluate derivatives of integrals..Anyone got a good link on some reading or watching on that? – Paze Mar 15 '14 at 17:02

4 Answers4

4

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_variables_and_bound_variables

The expression $$ \sum_{i=1}^3 \cos(i^2 k^3) $$ means $$ \cos(1^2k^3) + \cos(2^2k^3)+\cos(3^2k^3), $$ and that's the same as $$ \sum_{j=1}^3 \cos(j^2 k^3), $$ i.e. $i$ and $j$ are "bound variables", whereas $k$ is a "free variable".

The $t$ in $$ \int_a^x f(t)\,dt $$ is a bound variable, like $i$ and $j$ above, and $x$ is a free variable, like $k$ above. The value of the sums above depends on $k$, but not on anything called $i$ or $j$, and similarly the value of the integral above depends on $x$, but not on anything called $t$.

4

You're encountering two standard abuses of notation in calculus:

  1. The integral sign $\int$ is used to denote both "definite" integrals (limits of Riemann sums) and "indefinite" integrals (a.k.a., antiderivatives, with $\int f(x)\, dx$ denoting an arbitrary function $F$ whose derivative is $f$).

  2. Mathematically, a function is an association of a unique output to each input. Calculus books often write $y = f(x)$ and speak of $f(x)$ as "the function". While this usage is compact and practically convenient, it's potentially misleading (and technically incorrect).

Concretely, suppose $f(x) = x^2$ for all real $x$. The "function" here (the object that can gets differentiated and integrated in calculus) is the squaring operator. The symbol $x$ is merely a dummy variable: In the absence of external restrictions on the meanings of symbols, the equations $f(t) = t^2$, $f(u) = u^2$, and $f(\xi) = \xi^2$ define exactly the same function.


The "indefinite" usage of the integral sign allows us to write, with $C$ denoting a real number, $$ \int x^2\, dx = \frac{x^3}{3} + C. $$ Note that "each side is a function of $x$". However, with equivalent meaning we could write: $\int t^2\, dt = \frac{1}{3}t^3 + C$ , $\int u^2\, du = \frac{1}{3}u^3 + C$, or $\int \xi^2\, d\xi = \frac{1}{3}\xi^3 + C$.

The "$dx$" plays a couple of roles, one being to specify the name of the input variable to $f$. Writing $\int x^2\, dx$ means "antidifferentiate the squaring function". Writing (say) $\int x^2\, dt$ is ambiguous; if $x$ denotes a real number, then $\int x^2\, dt = x^2t + C$, but if $x$ denotes a function of $t$ there is no general simplification. Writing $\int x^2$ (with no differential) is therefore a recipe for disaster.


The "definite" usage of the integral sign behaves a little differently. The result of integrating the squaring function over some interval $[a, x]$ can be written $$ \int_a^x t^2\, dt = \frac{x^3}{3} - \frac{a^3}{3}. $$ The integral on the left depends on $x$ (and on $a$), but $t$ makes no sense outside the integral, and can be replaced by any letter other than $x$ or $a$ without changing the left-hand side.

If we denote by $F$ the function defined by $$ F(x) = \int_a^x t^2\, dt = \int_a^x f(t)\, dt, $$ viewing $a$ as a fixed real number, then indeed $F'(x) = x^2 = f(x)$. Again, we wouldn't expect a $t$ to appear, since nothing in the preceding equation depends on $t$.


Trouble occurs when these notations and conventions about dummy variables get mixed or otherwise abused. The following are tempting to write, but likely to confuse (at best): $$ \int_a^x f(x)\, dx;\qquad \frac{d}{dx} \int_a^b f(x)\, dx;\qquad \int f(x). $$

  • Hey, this is an awesome answer, but can you just explain to me why we ignore the fixed number a ? I know that it is probably a stupid question, but I am really having troubles understanding the second part of the FTC. – Martin Spasov Jul 22 '16 at 09:42
  • 1
    @SuburbanFilth: Since $a$ is a constant, its effect on the definite integral is to change the additive constant; after differentiating, this constant (and therefore the dependence on $a$) disappears. – Andrew D. Hwang Jul 22 '16 at 12:04
1

The t means nothing. It is just a dummy variable that allows you to "see" how you are integrating buy it disappears in the end (when we plug in the bounds of integrstion). In the case of F(x), a is some fixed point but x is actually itself variable and is, in fact, the main (and only true) variable in the expression. Thus, we can differentiate with respect to it. The first integral produces F(x)-F(a), and when we differentiate that wrt x, we kill the subtrahend (since a is fixed and thus f(a) is constant too), and get F'(x) which is f(x) by definition. It is a bit tricky the first time.

kevin
  • 279
1

Fix $a$. Then you can think of the function $F(x) = \int_a^x f(t)\;dt$ as a function which measures the area under $f$ from $a$ to $x$. The amount of area changes as $x$ changes. What FTC says is that the rate of change of this area at $x$, i.e. $\frac{d}{dx}F(x)$, is exactly $f(x)$.

As others have mentioned, the $t$ variable is a dummy variable. We could have instead written something like $F(t) = \int_a^t f(x)\;dx$, but then $F$ is a function of $t$ while our original $f$ is a function of $x$. We want the two to be functions of the same variable. (Much as how if we have $g$ as a function of $x$, then $g'$ is also a function of $x$.)

wckronholm
  • 3,948