3

I've figured out that $x=-5$ for this to work but I don't know how to state the general solution? (all cases)

Anyone know? D:

NasuSama
  • 3,364

4 Answers4

2

Hint: If you have two solutions, $x_1$ and $x_2$, then $$ 74x_1\equiv74x_2\pmod{53} $$ Since $\gcd(53,74)=1$, what does $$ 53\mid74(x_1-x_2) $$ imply?

robjohn
  • 345,667
  • One doesn't need Euclid's Lemma (or Bezout's identity) to deduce uniqueness of inverses. Rather, this is true in any commutative monoid, since it can be proved using only associativity and commutativity of multiplication - see my answer. – Bill Dubuque Feb 09 '14 at 00:21
0

First, write the congruence as $$74x = 1 + 53y$$

where $y$ is any integer. Then, $$74x - 53y = 1$$

As you said before, $x = -5$ (and so $y = -7$, which works for congruence). Then, there are more solutions $x = -5 + 53k$ where $k$ is any integer.

NasuSama
  • 3,364
0

Hint $\ $ If $\,a',a\,$ are solutions of $\,74x\equiv 1$ then $\,a'$ times $\,1\equiv 74a\,\Rightarrow\, a'\equiv\, \ldots\ $ Conversely $(\Leftarrow)$ multiplying $\, a'\equiv\, \ldots\,$ by $\,74\,$ shows $\,74a'\equiv 74(\dots)\,$ so if one of them is $\equiv 1\,$ then they both are.

Above we invoked a few times the fundamental Congruence Product Rule - see below. The converse works more generally: $\,a'\equiv a,\,\ f(a)\equiv 0\,\Rightarrow\, f(a')\equiv 0,\,$ for any polynomial $\,f(x)\,$ with integer coefficients, see the Polynomial Congruence Rule below.


Congruence Sum Rule $\rm\qquad\quad A\equiv a,\quad B\equiv b\ \Rightarrow\ \color{#0a0}{A+B\,\equiv\, a+b}\ \ \ (mod\ m)$

Proof $\rm\ \ m\: |\: A\!-\!a,\ B\!-\!b\ \Rightarrow\ m\ |\ (A\!-\!a) + (B\!-\!b)\ =\ \color{#0a0}{A+B - (a+b)} $

Congruence Product Rule $\rm\quad\ A\equiv a,\ \ and \ \ B\equiv b\ \Rightarrow\ \color{#c00}{AB\equiv ab}\ \ \ (mod\ m)$

Proof $\rm\ \ m\: |\: A\!-\!a,\ B\!-\!b\ \Rightarrow\ m\ |\ (A\!-\!a)\ B + a\ (B\!-\!b)\ =\ \color{#c00}{AB - ab} $

Congruence Power Rule $\rm\quad\ A\equiv a\ \Rightarrow\ A^n\equiv a^n\ \ (mod\ m)$

Proof $\ $ It is true for $\rm\,n=1\,$ and $\rm\,A\equiv a,\ A^n\equiv a^n \Rightarrow\, A^{n+1}\equiv a^{n+1},\,$ by the Product Rule, so the result follows by induction on $\,n.$

Polynomial Congruence Rule $\ $ If $\,f(x)\,$ is polynomial with integer coefficients then $\ A\equiv a\ \Rightarrow\ f(A)\equiv f(a)\,\pmod m.$

Proof $\ $ By induction on $\, n = $ degree $f.\,$ Clear if $\, n = 0.\,$ Else $\,f(x) = f(0) + x\,g(x)\,$ for $\,g(x)\,$ a polynomial with integer coefficients of degree $< n.\,$ By induction $\,g(A)\equiv g(a)\,$ so $\, A g(A)\equiv a g(A)\,$ by the Product Rule. Hence $\,f(A) = f(0)+Ag(A)\equiv f(0)+ag(a) = f(a)\,$ by the Sum Rule.

Beware $ $ that such rules need not hold true for other operations, e.g. the exponential analog of above $\rm A^B\equiv a^b$ is not generally true (unless $\rm B = b,\,$ so it reduces to the Power Rule, so follows by inductively applying $\,\rm b\,$ times the Product Rule).

Bill Dubuque
  • 272,048
  • Wait, I'm actually a bit confused by this. How does this answer the question posed by OP? – Alexander Gruber Feb 09 '14 at 04:53
  • @Alexander How doesn't it? – Bill Dubuque Feb 09 '14 at 07:22
  • If my understanding is correct he is asking how to find (to compute) the other x's for which this works, i.e. how to get from his partial answer to a full one. I'm not sure which part of your post addresses that (but admittedly I am a bit confused by your ellipsis notation- I'm not saying this is a bad answer, just that I don't understand and would like to). – Alexander Gruber Feb 09 '14 at 15:15
  • @Alex I interpreted the question as follows. Given the "congruences" tag, the OP is working with congruences (vs. quotient rings, and may not have knowledge of rings). The OP has a particular solution $,a\in\Bbb Z,$ of the congruence $,74x\equiv 1\pmod{53}$ and seeks the general solution, i.e. all integers which satisfy this congruence. The hint sketches a proof that the integer solutions are precisely the congruence class of any particular solution, i.e. solutions are unique mod $,m.,$ Did you interpret the question differently? – Bill Dubuque Feb 09 '14 at 16:21
0

As $\displaystyle 74\equiv21, 74x\equiv1\pmod{53}\iff 21x\equiv1\iff x\equiv21^{-1}\equiv3^{-1}\cdot7^{-1}$

Now as $18\cdot3=54\equiv1\pmod{53}\iff3^{-1}\equiv18$

and $53\cdot2-7\cdot15=1\implies 7(-15)\equiv1\pmod{53}\iff7^{-1}\equiv-15$

$\displaystyle\implies x\equiv18(-15)\pmod{53}\equiv-5\equiv48$

So, we can write $x=-5+53a=48+53(a-1)=48+53b$ where $a,b$ are any integers