3

I'm asking this because I could only think of infinite rings where this is true. This must include rings.

rschwieb
  • 153,510
  • Are you saying you want a ring that does not have any of those elements, or a ring that might have some of them and also has others that do not match those descriptions? A ring is closed under both of its operations, and while it is not guaranteed to have a multiplicative identity, it must have an additive identity... – abiessu Dec 10 '13 at 20:43

1 Answers1

2

There's a reason why you can't find one! If by "ring" you mean a ring with unity, then every non-zero element of a finite ring $R$ is either a unit or a zero divisor. See this link for a proof.

Dan
  • 7,951