Let $\Gamma = SL_2(\mathbb{Z})$. Let $\mathcal{H} = \{z \in \mathbb{C}\ |\ Im(z) > 0\}$. Let $\sigma = \left( \begin{array}{ccc} p & q \\ r & s \end{array} \right)$ be an element of $\Gamma$. Let $z \in \mathcal{H}$. We write $$\sigma z = \frac{pz + q}{rz + s}$$ It is easy to see that $\sigma z \in \mathcal{H}$ and $\Gamma$ acts on $\mathcal{H}$. Let $z, w \in \mathcal{H}$. We say $z$ and $w$ are equivalent if there exists $\sigma \in \Gamma$ such that $w = \sigma z$. It is well known the stabilizer of a point of $\mathcal{H}$ is trivial except it is equivalent to $i$ or $\rho = (-1 + i\sqrt 3)/2$(see here). Note that $\rho$ is a primitive cube root of unity.
On the other hand, it is well known that the unit group of an imaginary quadratic number field is trivial except it is $\mathbb{Q}(i)$ or $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-3}) = \mathbb{Q}(\rho)$.
My question Are these two facts related or mere coincidence? If they are related, how?