New to first order logic and peano arithmetic, how would one prove that $$(x^y)^z = x^{z\times y}$$ without using exponentiation, only multiplication and addition?
Having difficulty figuring finding where to start.
New to first order logic and peano arithmetic, how would one prove that $$(x^y)^z = x^{z\times y}$$ without using exponentiation, only multiplication and addition?
Having difficulty figuring finding where to start.
I do not sure about the context what you are working. I try this. If $n$ is a natural number, we have the succesor $n^+$ of $n$. Using
Definition 1 (Exponentiation). Let $x$ be a natural number. To raise $x$ to the power $0$, we define $x^0 := 1$. Now suppose recursively that $x^n$ has been defined for some natural number $n$, then we define $x^{(n^+)}:= x^n \times x$
Definition 2 (Multiplication). Let $x$ be a natural number. To multiply zero to $x$, we define $x \times 0 := 0$. Now suppose recursively that we have defined how to multiply $y$ to $x$. Then we can multiply $y^+$ to $x$ by defining $x \times (y^+) := (x \times y) + x$.
Lemma 3. Let $x,y,z$ natural numbers. Then we have $x^y x^z = x^{y + z}$.
We want to prove:
Proposition 4. Let $x,y,z$ natural numbers. Then we have $(x^y)^z=x^{y \times z}$.
Proof. By induct on $z$ (with $y$ fixed). First we do the base case $z = 0$, i.e., we show $(x^y)^0=x^{y \times 0}$. By the definition of exponentiation, we have $(x^y)^z = (x^y)^0 = 1$, while $x^{y \times 0} = x^0 = 1$. Thus the base case is done. Now suppose inductively that $(x^y)^z=x^{y \times z}$, now we have to prove that $(x^y)^{(z^+)}=x^{y \times (z^+)}$ to close the induction. By the definition of exponentiation, we have $(x^y)^{(z^+)} = (x^y)^{z} \times x^y$ and, by inductive hypothesis, we obtain $(x^y)^{z} \times x^y = x^{y \times z} \times x^y$. By other hand, by definition of multiplication, we have $x^{y \times (z^+)} = x^{(y \times z) + y}$ and, by Lemma 3, $x^{(y \times z) + y} = x^{y \times z} \times x^y$. Thus both sides are equal, as desired. This close the induction.
To prove Lemma 3, similarly you can induct on $z$, with $y$ fixed.
http://dcproof.wordpress.com/ I start with a version of Peano's Axioms and addition and multiplication functions.
– Dan Christensen Dec 03 '13 at 03:43