2

My question is as follows: $a,b \in L$ where $L$ is a ring. We are given that $ab=1$.

I need to prove or disprove that $a$ is invertible (meaning, there is an element $x \in L : ax=xa=1$).

But how can we say that for sure? just because $ab=1$ doesn't mean that $ba=1$, ba could be something else altogether, we werent given that this is a commutative ring.

Please give advice on how to solve, thank you.

Word by word translation of the question to make it clearer: Prove or disprove that if $a$ and $b$ are elements of $L$ and $ab=1$, then $a$ is invertible.

Oria Gruber
  • 12,739
  • Yes, indeed, @nik ! I wanted to delete my answer but since Oria started a dialogue about it I'll leave my post (also because I wrote a comment on some students' reaction to certain similar examples). – Georges Elencwajg Nov 02 '13 at 22:51
  • You didn't quantify whether this was for all $a$ there exists a $b$ such that $ab = 1$. Is that what you mean? This makes it evident it is invertible (it is the def'n). – Don Larynx Nov 02 '13 at 22:17
  • I'll quote the question word by word: prove or disprove that if a and b are elements of L and ab=1 then a is invertible. – Oria Gruber Nov 02 '13 at 22:19
  • Admitting an inverse. An object that is invertible is referred to as an invertible element in a monoid or a unit ring, or to a map, which admits an inverse map iff it is bijective. This means it has a left and right inverse in the inverse part, if that is what you are asking @OriaGruber – Don Larynx Nov 02 '13 at 22:25

1 Answers1

1

Suppose $L$ is the ring of $\mathbb R$-linear maps $l:\mathbb R[X]\to \mathbb R[X]$ (with multiplication being composition).
Consider $D,I\in L$ defined by $D(P(X))=P'(X)$ and $I(P(X))=\int _0^XP(t)dt$.
Then $D\circ I=Id$ but nevertheless $D$ is not invertible because...