4

I have seen the following one. Please give the proof of the observation.

We know that, The difference between the sum of the odd numbered digits (1st, 3rd, 5th...) and the sum of the even numbered digits (2nd, 4th...) is divisible by $11$. I have checked the same for other numbers in different base system. For example, if we want to know $27$ is divisible by $3$ or not.

To check the divisibility for $3$, take $1$ less than $3$ (i.e., $2$) and follow as shown below:

$27 = 2 \cdot 13 + 1$ and then $13 = 2 \cdot6 + 1$ and then $6 = 2 \cdot 3 + 0$ and then $3 = 2 \cdot1 + 1$ and then $1 = 2 \cdot0 + 1$

Now the remainders in base system is $27 = 11011$ sum of altranative digits and their diffrence is $( 1 + 0 + 1) - (1 + 1) = 0$ So, $27$ is divisible by $3$. What I want to say that, to check the divisibility of a number $K$, we will write the number in $K-1$ base system and then we apply the $11$ divisibility rule. How this method is working. Please give me the proof. Thanks in advance.

Haris
  • 3,409
MahimA
  • 193
  • 3
    That's a keen observation. You might want to look at modular arithmetic. Also, just as you generalized from $11$ to $b+1$ in base $b$, there are generalizations of the divisibility rules for $2$ and $5$ to the divisors of $b$ and of the divisibility rules for $3$ and $9$ to the divisors of $b-1$. – joriki Jul 19 '11 at 10:20

2 Answers2

5

Yes, the test for divisibility by $11$ generalizes to arbitrary radix. Using modular arithmetic this amounts to simply evaluating a polynomial. Notice that radix notation has polynomial form. Namely in radix $\rm\:b\:$ the digit string $\rm\ d_n\ \cdots\ d_1\ d_0\ $ denotes $\rm\ d_n\ b^n +\:\cdots\: + d_1\ b + d_0\: =\ P(b),\ $ where $\rm\:\ P(x)\: =\ d_n\ x^n +\:\cdots\: d_1\ x + d_0\ $ is the polynomial associated to the string of digits.

Therefore $\rm\ mod\ b+1\ $ we infer $\rm\ b\equiv -1\ $ $\Rightarrow$ $\rm\ P(b)\equiv P(-1)\equiv d_0 - d_1 + d_2 - d_3 +\:\cdots\:.\: $ Similar modular reductions yield analogous divisibility tests, e.g. see here for casting out $91$'s.

If modular arithmetic is unfamiliar then one may proceed more simply as follows:

Factor Theorem $\rm\;\Rightarrow\; x-a\ |\ P(x)-P(a)\ $ so $\rm\ x = b,\ a= -1\ \Rightarrow\ b+1\ |\ P(b)-P(-1)\:.$

See also this post and various other posts on generalizations of casting out nines.

Bill Dubuque
  • 272,048
2

Your question is rather confusingly written, but I assume you're asking for a proof that the base-10 divisibility rule for 11 — sum the even-numbered digits, subtract the odd-numbered digits, check (recursively) if result is divisible by 11 — can be generalized to a divisibility rule for $n+1$ in base $n$.

For a simple proof, let $x = \sum_{k=0}^\infty x_k n^k$, where $n$ is the base and $x_0$, $x_1$, $x_2$, etc. are the base-$n$ digits of $x$. Since $n \equiv -1 \mod n+1$, we have

$$ n^k \equiv (-1)^k = \begin{cases} \phantom{+}1 & \text{if }k\text{ is even,} \\ -1 & \text{if }k\text{ is odd,} \end{cases}\mod n+1 $$

and therefore

$$ x = \sum_{k=0}^\infty x_k n^k \equiv \sum_{k=0}^\infty x_k (-1)^k = \sum_{k\text{ even}} x_k - \sum_{k\text{ odd}} x_k \mod n+1.$$

Thus, $x$ is divisible by $n+1$ if and only if the sum of its even base-$n$ digits minus the sum of its odd base-$n$ digits is divisible by $n+1$.