In Munkres' Topology, Theorem 21.3 says
Let $f:X \to Y$. If the function, $f$ is continuous, then for every convergent series $x_n \to x$ in $X$, the sequence $f(x_n)$ converges to $f(x)$. The converse holds if $X$ is metrizable.
I don't understand what they mean by "the converse" here. It certainly can't mean "if $f(x_n)$ converges to $f(x)$ then $x_n \to x$" since this is patently false (e.g. if $f$ is constant or periodic). I think what it means is something like:
Let $y_n \to y$ where the $y_n$ and $y$ are in the image of $f$. Then, there exists points $x_n$ and $x$ in $X$ such that $x_n \to x$, $f(x_n) = y_n$, and $f(y) = y$.
If this is right, I don't understand the proof though. The book proves that $f(\overline{A}) \subset \overline{f(A)}$ for $A \subset X$ but I don't see how that implies my statement above.