I am having a lot of trouble with a GCD problem. The problem is find $\gcd(5a+3,4a+7)$ for $a>0.$ I have been working on this for quite a while now and have the following issues:
I first tried to apply the euclidean algorithm, but the problem was that I had no idea how to deal with a when finding r. It didn't make much sense to try and divide two polynomials in terms of a.
So I began trying a few values of a.
After trying a few values, I thought they may be co-prime. so I tried proving this by showing x(5a+3) + y(4a+7) = 1. This implies that a(5x+4y)+(3x+7y) = 1, and so 5x+4y =0 and 3x+7y = 1. This doens't have a solution in the integers.
So I began trying to prove this by induction. This didn't work either. Specifically, I had no idea of showing if d|(5a+8) then d|(5a+3) (similarly for the other value) to derive a contradiction.
So I tried more values. After checking the first 2000 digits, I realized 1 and 23 are the only possible values for the gcd (atleast up to 2000). Specifically, whenever a has the form 27+23j, we get that they have 23 as a common factor. Similarly, when a=4 we get the case where they both equal 23.
Otherwise, they are reletively prime.
I can prove that if a = 27+23j, then their gcd is 23 using the euclidean algorithm:
5(27+23j) +3 = [4(27+23j)+7] + 23+23j
4(27+23j)+7 = (23+23j)4 + 23
(23+23j)4 = 23(4+4j) + 0
And so gcd(5(27+23j)+3,4(27+23j)+7) = gcd(23(4j+4),23) = 23 for any j.
But how do I prove that if a is not 4, and is not of the form 27+23j for some j, then gcd(5a+3,4a+7)=1? I am not sure where to proceed with this proof, how to contrain a to make it more wieldy.
The difference in this question from the similar one posted before is twofold: firstly, the polynomials we’re considering are different. Second, my problem is that of proving that d=1 when certain conditions hold for a, not that of finding d given certain conditions for a. I’m confident my conjecture is correct, but am in need of techniques to help me prove it.