7

Let $\operatorname{B}(n)$ denote the Bernoulli numbers and $\operatorname{b}(n) = \operatorname{B}(n)/n$ with $b(0)=1$ the divided Bernoulli numbers. Also let $\sigma_{k}(n)= \sum_{d \mid n} d^k$ denote the sum of the $k$-th powers of the positive divisors of $n$.

Recently Simon Plouffe made the following conjecture in OEIS A013965:

$$ \sum_{j \ge 1} \frac{\sigma_{17}(j)}{\exp(2 \pi j)} \, = \, \frac{43867}{28728} \, = \, \frac{\operatorname{B}(18)}{36} . $$

Plouffe found similar relations earlier, but without mentioning the connection with the Bernoulli numbers, for example in A001160 and A013961.

Vaclav Kotesovec generalized these observations in A362870 with the following far-reaching conjecture:

If $\nu$ is twice an odd number greater than 1 (i.e., $\nu = 4n+2$, a term of A016825 that is greater than 2), then

$$ \operatorname{b}(\nu) = \frac{\operatorname{B}(\nu)}{\nu} \, = \, 2 \sum_{j \ge 1} \frac{\sigma_{\nu-1}(j)} { \exp(2 \pi j)} \, = \, \frac{A358625(\nu)}{A075180(\nu - 1)}. $$

We numerically checked the first 50 terms $\nu > 2$ of A016825. They suggest the plausibility of the conjecture. Although it becomes increasingly challenging for larger values to achieve satisfactory accuracy, we gained in this range at least agreement in the first 800 decimal places.

Does anyone know a proof or can give references to relevant literature?

Edit: From Raymond Manzoni's answer and the literature he cites it is clear that the formulas quoted above are not conjectures but proven facts. A detailed presentation of the theory and a proof of Ramanujan's theorem can be found in:

Bruce C. Berndt, Analytic Eisenstein series, theta functions, and series relations in the spirit of Ramanujan. J. Reine Angew. Math., 303/304:332–365, 1978. (See Corollary 5.10, p.355).

Peter Luschny
  • 885
  • 4
  • 8
  • For those of us who are less familiar with such things: what are the reasons one might make this conjecture about $\sum \sigma_k(j) / exp(2\pi j)$? Given the expression, I can certainly see evaluating it numerically and observing it to be rational. But why would one come to that expression to begin with?

    I expect that any proof of the identity would shed some light on the significance of the sum. But given that it's only conjecture, why would one come to that conjecture to begin with?

    – Alex Meiburg May 08 '23 at 18:59
  • 1
    See this answer https://math.stackexchange.com/a/1944103/72031 – Paramanand Singh May 13 '23 at 03:16

2 Answers2

9

There are a lot of connections with those sums and Bernoulli numbers. That result I published on the OEIS about A013965, A001160 and A013961 is not isolated. You can see others like that here: https://vixra.org/pdf/2305.0022v2.pdf. There are 659 other results in the same vein. Most of those are not yet published on the OEIS.

Now about the function sigma and related sums: there are other results also but this time connected to prime numbers and the Eisenstein series here: https://vixra.org/pdf/2304.0180v2.pdf.

These were inspired by a finding from Ramanujan about Bernoulli numbers and this sum :

$$ \sum_{n>=1}\ \frac{n^{4 k+1}}{\exp(2 \pi n) - 1} = \frac{\operatorname{Bernoulli}(4 k+2)}{2(4k+2)}$$ I extended the finding to other sums. Does this put some light on these sums ? Best regards, Simon Plouffe

Peter Luschny
  • 885
  • 4
  • 8
6

Simon Plouffe proposed in this $2003$ article (and in his answer here) this formula implicit in Ramanujan's work : $$\frac {B_{4n+2}}{8n+4}=\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac {k^{4n+1}}{e^{\,2k\pi}-1}$$

According to Bruce Berndt in "Ramanujan's Notebooks part V" p.$427$ (see too his $1977$ paper "Modular transformations and generalizations of several formulae of Ramanujan" ) this formula was proved first by Glaisher in $1889$ although established by Hurwitz in $1881$ in his thesis.
Other interesting generalizations may be found in Vepsas "On Plouffe's Ramanujan Identities" and Bagis "Evaluations of Series Related to Jacobi Elliptic Functions" as well as Zucker's "The Summation of Series of Hyperbolic Functions" and others (for people hoping to generalize this for other values of $\zeta$...).

Following Lambert series is a generating function for the $\sigma_a$ function : $$\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{k^a q^k}{1-q^k} = \sum_{k=1}^\infty \sum_{j=1}^\infty k^a q^{j\,k} = \sum_{k=1}^\infty q^k \sigma_a(k)$$

Use $\,a=4n+1$ and $\,q=e^{-2\pi}\,$ to conclude.

Raymond Manzoni
  • 43,021
  • 5
  • 86
  • 140
  • Thank you very much, Raymond. So this seems to be a pretty standard result (Hurwitz/Glaisher/Berndt applied to Lambert series for sigma) and labels like 'conjecture' or 'empirical' on OEIS can be safely removed from the related identities as they are misleading at best. Do I understand this correctly? – Peter Luschny May 09 '23 at 05:29
  • Glad it helped @PeterLuschny. I added references for the neat $\frac {B_{4n+2}}{8n+4}=\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac {k^{4n+1}}{e^{,2k\pi}-1}$ because this formula is rather old but not so easy to find except in Simon Plouffe's work. The Lambert series derivation at the end appears in Hardy&Wright §17.10 and is classical in number theory. Thanks too for the opportunity of having Simon Plouffe here with links to very nice subjects! – Raymond Manzoni May 09 '23 at 06:38
  • So who is the author of the first formula? Ramanujan was born in 1887... – Vaclav Kotesovec May 10 '23 at 09:18
  • @VaclavKotesovec : The references provided by Berndt are :
    • Glaisher "On the series which represent the twelve elliptic and four zeta functions" Mess. Math. 18 (1889), 1-84 here for a proof
    • Hurwitz (in 1881 in his thesis) references

    [1] Grundlagen einer independenten Theorie der elliptischen Modu1funktionen und Theorie der Multiplikator-Gleichungen erster Stufe, Math. Ann. 18 (1881), 528-592. [2] Mathematische Werke, Band I (paywall here )

    – Raymond Manzoni May 10 '23 at 11:55
  • rather here and possibly free here (I didn't read these papers...) – Raymond Manzoni May 10 '23 at 12:47
  • 1
    @VaclavKotesovec: Ramanujan proved a general formula (in terms of recurrence relation) for sums of type $S_r(q) =-\frac{B_{r+1}}{2(r+1)}+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{n^rq^n}{1-q^n}$ and the first formula listed in this answer is an immediate consequence when one puts $q=e^{-2\pi}$. See details at https://math.stackexchange.com/a/1944103/72031 Ramanujan's technique gives closed form evaluation for $r=4m+3$ also. – Paramanand Singh May 13 '23 at 03:35