Let $\operatorname{B}(n)$ denote the Bernoulli numbers and $\operatorname{b}(n) = \operatorname{B}(n)/n$ with $b(0)=1$ the divided Bernoulli numbers. Also let $\sigma_{k}(n)= \sum_{d \mid n} d^k$ denote the sum of the $k$-th powers of the positive divisors of $n$.
Recently Simon Plouffe made the following conjecture in OEIS A013965:
$$ \sum_{j \ge 1} \frac{\sigma_{17}(j)}{\exp(2 \pi j)} \, = \, \frac{43867}{28728} \, = \, \frac{\operatorname{B}(18)}{36} . $$
Plouffe found similar relations earlier, but without mentioning the connection with the Bernoulli numbers, for example in A001160 and A013961.
Vaclav Kotesovec generalized these observations in A362870 with the following far-reaching conjecture:
If $\nu$ is twice an odd number greater than 1 (i.e., $\nu = 4n+2$, a term of A016825 that is greater than 2), then
$$ \operatorname{b}(\nu) = \frac{\operatorname{B}(\nu)}{\nu} \, = \, 2 \sum_{j \ge 1} \frac{\sigma_{\nu-1}(j)} { \exp(2 \pi j)} \, = \, \frac{A358625(\nu)}{A075180(\nu - 1)}. $$
We numerically checked the first 50 terms $\nu > 2$ of A016825. They suggest the plausibility of the conjecture. Although it becomes increasingly challenging for larger values to achieve satisfactory accuracy, we gained in this range at least agreement in the first 800 decimal places.
Does anyone know a proof or can give references to relevant literature?
Edit: From Raymond Manzoni's answer and the literature he cites it is clear that the formulas quoted above are not conjectures but proven facts. A detailed presentation of the theory and a proof of Ramanujan's theorem can be found in:
Bruce C. Berndt, Analytic Eisenstein series, theta functions, and series relations in the spirit of Ramanujan. J. Reine Angew. Math., 303/304:332–365, 1978. (See Corollary 5.10, p.355).
I expect that any proof of the identity would shed some light on the significance of the sum. But given that it's only conjecture, why would one come to that conjecture to begin with?
– Alex Meiburg May 08 '23 at 18:59