According to the definition, if $a ∈ \mathbb{R}^+$, $m ∈ \mathbb{Z}$, and $n ∈ \mathbb{Z}^+$, then: $a^ \frac mn = \sqrt[n] {a^m}$
I got why there must be a bound for $a$ $($and $m,n)$, but I wonder if this expression is valid for $a<0$ too.
Take $(-3)^\frac 23$. If I use the expression above, I have:
$(-3)^\frac 23 = \sqrt[3] {(-3)^2} = \sqrt[3] {9} ≃ 2.08$
When I input $(-3)^\frac 23$ into my CASIO hand calculator, I got the same result.
But now let's consider $(-3)^ \frac 22$. If I use the expression above, I have:
$(-3)^\frac 22 = \sqrt[2] {(-3)^2} = \sqrt[2] {9} = 3$
But we know that $(-3)^\frac 22 = (-3)^1 = - 3$
This can only be understood as either:
(1) $(-3)^\frac 22$ is a valid number but the expression $a^ \frac mn = \sqrt[n] {a^m}$ doesn't apply.
(2) $(-3)^\frac 22$ is not a valid number at all if I were to assume that $a^ \frac mn = \sqrt[n] {a^m}$ is true for all valid numbers $a^ \frac mn$.
When I input $(-3)^\frac 22$ into the same calculator, it yielded $-3$. Apparently, it simplified $\frac 22$ into 1 and computed $(-3)^1$, which is $-3$.
This makes me think that in the $(-3)^ \frac 23$ example above, it seems the calculator didn't compute the final value using the expression $a^ \frac mn = \sqrt[n] {a^m}$. It seems to have simplified $\frac 23$ into $0.666...7$ and computed $(-3)^{0.666...7}$ instead, which makes me wonder if $(-3)^ \frac 23$ is a valid number at all in $\mathbb{R}$. Please advise.
Thank you!
EDITED