Whether the fibers of this map are finite and whether this map is a finite map are actually two separate questions. The former condition is called "quasi-finiteness" and is not in general equivalent to the map being finite, as one can see from the example of $\Bbb C[x]\to \Bbb C[x,x^{-1}]$. This is not a finite map (any finite set of generators for $\Bbb C[x,x^{-1}]$ as a $\Bbb C[x]$-module must have a least power of $x$ in it, and there are powers of $x$ in $\Bbb C[x,x^{-1}]$ of arbitrarily negative degree) but it does have finite fibers: all fibers are either zero or one point. We always have that a finite map is quasi-finite, though.
Let's check if your map has finite fibers - if the answer is yes, we'll move on to checking if it is finite. To calculate the fiber above a point $x=a$, we take the fiber product of our map $\operatorname{Spec} \Bbb C[x,y]/(x^3+x^2y+xy^2)\to\operatorname{Spec} \Bbb C[x]$ with $\operatorname{Spec} \Bbb C[x]/(x-a)\to\operatorname{Spec}\Bbb C[x]$, giving $$\operatorname{Spec} \Bbb C[x,y]/(x^3+x^2y+xy^2) \times_{\operatorname{Spec} \Bbb C[x]} \operatorname{Spec} \Bbb C[x]/(x-a) \cong \operatorname{Spec} \Bbb C[y]/(a^3+a^2y+ay^2).$$ If $a\neq 0$, this is finite: we get two points (coming from the two solutions of a quadratic in $y$); if $a=0$ we get $\operatorname{Spec} \Bbb C[y]$ which is not finite. So your map is not quasi-finite and therefore not finite. (For more details on why the fiber product calculates the fiber, see for instance here.)
To confirm your thought that the map is not integral due to the generating relation, we show that $y\in\Bbb C[x,y]/(x^3+x^2y+xy^2)$ is not the root of any monic polynomial $p(t)\in (\Bbb C[x])[t]$: the ring homomorphism $\Bbb C[x][t] \to \Bbb C[x,y]$ by $t\mapsto y$ would send $p(t)$ to a polynomial in $\Bbb C[x,y]$ which is not divisible by $x$ (as $p$ is monic) and hence not in $(x^3+x^2y+xy^2)$. But the composition with the quotient map $\Bbb C[x,y]\to\Bbb C[x,y]/(x^3+x^2y+xy^2)$ should send $p(y)$ to zero - that's what it means to satisfy the polynomial, after all. This shows that $y\in\Bbb C[x,y]/(x^3,x^2y,xy^2)$ is not integral over $\Bbb C[x]$.
As far as what is meant by $V(\cdot)$, the details depends on the context, but it's always the same underlying idea: stuff where $\cdot$ vanishes. In "classical" algebraic geometry, this is just the set of points that satisfies all the stuff in $\cdot$; with schemes this is the primes containing $\cdot$, and you can prove these are "the same": if $(a_1,\cdots,a_n)$ satisfies some equation $f(x_1,\cdots,x_n)$, then $f(x_1,\cdots,x_n)\subset (x_1-a_1,\cdots,x_n-a_n)$.
$\operatorname{Spec}$
to format $\operatorname{Spec}$ which produces better spacing. I am not totally sure what to do with "aboth", though - that's a word I don't recognize. – KReiser Feb 19 '23 at 17:38