0

If A=$\left[ \begin{array}{ccc} -1 & 4 \\ 2 & 1 \end{array}\right]$ then prove that $3\tan {A}=A\tan{3}$.

I do have a solution with me, but I am not able to understand a part in that.

enter image description here

Why would $\lambda$ satisfy $\tan{A}=aA+bI$?

Arsenic
  • 321
  • I'm skeptical: for an analytic function $f(x) $ where the power series at zero has large enough radius of convergence, we can define $f(A)$ for matrix $A.$ If that works, the Cayley-Hamilton theorem says that we can calculate $f(A)$ in terms of just the first few powers of $A.$ However, the Taylor series for tangent has radius of convergence $\pi / 2.$ You are not giving any evidence that you have a way around divergence, so I would regard the conclusion as meaningless. What is your background? – Will Jagy Jan 19 '23 at 22:31
  • Well, you are correct in your statement and I have not presented any evidence-right. But, considering the existence of the required premise and writing the Taylor function to be explicit-how would the eigenvalue satisfy the explicit relation? (tanA=kA is the final deduction) – Arsenic Jan 19 '23 at 22:46
  • Tell you what, the sine function has Taylor series with infinite radius of convergence. There is an unambiguous matrix value for $\sin A.$ Using $A^2 = 9I,$ write out the first few, $A - \frac{A^3}{6} + \frac{A^5}{120} -+$ see if you can calculate $\sin A$ in its entirety. Comes out similar to your given problem. – Will Jagy Jan 19 '23 at 23:07
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trigonometric_functions_of_matrices Maybe, maybe, maybe, one could define the tangent of a matrix as the sine times the inverse of its cosine, should the cosine be invertible, – Will Jagy Jan 19 '23 at 23:15
  • well all of that is definitely true, but my real doubt still stays the fact that how does lambda satisfy the converged relation (if it converges AT ALL) – Arsenic Jan 19 '23 at 23:25
  • Please find $\sin A $ as I asked. Also find $\cos A.$ These use the usual power series, with $A^2 = 9 I, A^3 = 9 A, A^4 = 81 I, A^5 = 81 A, A^6 = 729 I, A^7 = 729 A, $ You can do the original problem as they wished using $ \sin A (\cos A)^{-1}$ – Will Jagy Jan 20 '23 at 01:02
  • Note that there is a misprint in the 4th line before the end ($a=\tan A/3$ instead of $\tan3/3$). Btw, where does this screenshot come from? – Anne Bauval Jan 20 '23 at 12:15
  • @Will Jagy : Hi, Will ! have you seen the interesting answer by Anne Bauval ? – Jean Marie Jan 23 '23 at 14:20
  • 1
    @JeanMarie Hi! I was not aware that there was a general treatment possible. I would guess that, if $A,B$ don't commute, $\tan(A+B)$ is not so simple in terms of $\tan A, \tan B.$ Actually, I guess sine and cosine of a sum of matrices don't come out right, despite convergent power series as in $e^A$ – Will Jagy Jan 23 '23 at 18:15
  • 2
    Cf. https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1634488/how-could-we-define-the-factorial-of-a-matrix/ – Travis Willse Jan 23 '23 at 22:35

3 Answers3

4

The most straight forward way is to find a real invertible 2 $\times$ 2 matrix $P$ such that $P^{-1}AP= \text {diag}(3,-3)$. Then $$\sin A=A-\frac{1}{3!}A^3+...$$ $$=P \text {diag}(\sin 3,-\sin 3)P^{-1}$$ and $$\cos A=P\text{diag}(\cos 3,\cos 3)P^{-1}$$ so $$(\cos A)^{-1}=P\text{diag}(\sec 3,\sec 3)P^{-1}$$.Then multiply the sin matrix by the inverse of the cos matrix(Fortunately these matrices commute so the order of multiplication doesn't matter.)We conclude that $$\tan A=P\text {diag}(\tan 3,-\tan 3)P^{-1}.$$ The question would have been more challenging if $A$ had not been diagonalizable.

P. Lawrence
  • 5,674
  • I fully agree with you but this does not answer the question, i.e. it does not explain where this "$\tan A=aA+bI$ (1)" come from and why "equation (1) is satisfied by eigen values". I am preparing an answer... – Anne Bauval Jan 20 '23 at 12:18
  • [+1] But what prevented you to write directly $\tan A=P\text {diag}(\tan 3,-\tan 3)P^{-1}$ ? Is it because, going from $-3$ to $3$ you cross poles of $\tan$ on the $x$ axis ? – Jean Marie Feb 12 '23 at 08:12
4

By holomorphic functional calculus, $\tan A$ may be defined by $$\tan A=\frac1{2\pi i}\int_\Gamma\frac{\tan z}{zI-A}\,dz,$$ where:

  • $\Gamma$ is (after correction, thanks to Jean Marie's kind comments) some positively oriented curve delimiting a domain containing $A$'s eigenvalues but containging none of $\tan$'s poles $\left(\Bbb Z+\frac12\right)\pi,$ e.g. the union of the circle $\Gamma_4:|z|=4$ oriented positively and the circle $\Gamma_2:|z|=2$ oriented negatively,
  • and by Cayley-Hamilton, $A^2=9I,$ so $$\frac1{zI-A}=\frac1{z^2-9}A+\frac z{z^2-9}I.$$

Plugging this into the definition of $\tan A$ above, we obtain $$\tan A=aA+bI$$ where $a,b$ are the corresponding integrals on $\Gamma=\Gamma_4\cup\Gamma_2.$

Applying exactly the same process to any of the two eigenvalues $\lambda=\pm3$ of $A,$ we obtain $$\tan\lambda=a\lambda+b$$ for the same constants $a,b.$

The end is like in your solution: solving these two equations, we get $b=0$ and $a=\frac{\tan 3}3,$ so $\tan A=\frac{\tan 3}3A.$

Anne Bauval
  • 34,650
3

Let $A=\left(\begin{array}{rr} -1 & 4 \\ 2 & 1 \end{array}\right) \text{; its eigenvalues are} \ 3, \ -3.$

I will use, as Anne Bauval has done, the Cauchy integral formula for operators :

$$f(A)=\frac{1}{2 i \pi}\int_{\gamma}(zI-A)^{-1}f(A)dz \ \text{with} \ \ f(A)=\tan(A) \tag{1}$$

but in a different way.

Formula (1) is valid

  • for a closed path $\gamma$ enclosing all the eigenvalues of $A$

  • for a holomorphic function $f$. $f(z)=\tan(z)=\frac{\sin(z)}{\cos(z)}$ is holomorphic only if we restrict it to a region which doesn't contain any of its poles $(2k+1)\frac{\pi}{2}$. Closed path $\gamma$ must be situated in such a region.

Here is such a closed path :

enter image description here

Fig. 1 : Integration path $\gamma$. Poles $-3, 3$ are featured in green. Poles $(2k+1)\frac{\pi}{2}$ of function $\tan$ (in red) are outside path $\gamma$.

Let $I$ be the $2 \times 2$ unit matrix. We can give an explicit form to matrix :

$$(zI-A)^{-1}=\frac{1}{z^2-9}\left(\begin{array}{cc} z-1 & 4 \\ 2 & z+1 \end{array}\right)$$

Therefore, the result is :

$$\tan(A)=\frac{1}{2 i \pi}\left(\begin{array}{cc} \int_{\gamma}\frac{\tan(z)(z-1)}{z^2-9}dz & \int_{\gamma}\frac{4\tan(z)}{z^2-9}dz\\\int_{\gamma}\frac{2\tan(z)}{z^2-9}dz & \int_{\gamma}\frac{\tan(z)(z+1)}{z^2-9}dz \end{array}\right)$$

Each integral is easily computed with the theorem of residues, because poles $-3, 3$ interior to $\gamma$ are simple. If we note $c=\frac{\tan(3)}{3}$ :

$$\tan(A)=\frac{1}{2 i \pi}\left(\begin{array}{rr} -2 i \pi c & 8 i \pi c\\ 4 i \pi c & 2 i \pi c \end{array}\right)=cA$$

A side remark : I have checked my results by using "integral" function of Matlab which can do complex integration along any path. Here is the code for example for the first integral, where the "WayPoints" (integration path represented on Fig. 1) are given in list $p$.

 clear all;
 p=[4+i,-i,-4+i,-4-2i,4-2i,4+i];
 integral(@(z)(tan(z).*(z-1)./(z.^2-9)),p(1),p(1),'WayPoints',p)
Jean Marie
  • 81,803