3

While proving Lemma 13.2

Let X be a topological space. Suppose that $\mathcal{C}$ is a collection of open sets of X such that for each open set U of X and each x in U, there is an element C of $\mathcal{C}$ such that x ∈ C ⊂ U. Then $\mathcal{C}$ is a basis for the topology of X.

of Munkres', we first proved that $\mathcal{C}$ is a basis. Basis of what topology? The given topology on X? If yes, then why did we go on to prove that the topology generated by $\mathcal{C}$ is the same as the given topology on X when essentially proving the first part gives us what is said in the lemma?

Math boi
  • 102
  • 4
    'Let $X$ be a topological space', means $X$ comes equipped with a topology $\tau,$ which tells you what the open sets are. Then you just take a collection $\mathcal{C}$ of them satisfying a certain condition. You then prove that $\mathcal{C}$ is a basis of some topology on $X,$ let's call it $\tau_{\mathcal{C}}$ i.e. the topology generated by $\mathcal{C}.$ But a priori, $\tau_{\mathcal{C}},$ might 'miss' some open sets, that is why you need to show that those two topologies are the same. – F_M_ Jan 10 '23 at 16:16
  • 1
    Yes, the topology of $X$. I don't know what you went to prove specifically, but of course you need to prove that the topology generated by $\mathcal C$ is the topology of $X$, otherwise it could just be smaller. – Sassatelli Giulio Jan 10 '23 at 16:17
  • 1
    @F_M_ Oh, so what you're saying is that when we define a basis, we do not explicitly mention the topology it is defined for, just that if it satisfies those two conditions then it is a basis for some topology on X, is it? And then proving that $\mathcal{C}$ is a basis means that we're proving that it is a basis for some top. on X, not essentially the one we're given. To prove that they're the same, we have to work both ways: prove that $\mathcal{C}$ is indeed a basis (for some top. on X) and that the top. it is a basis of, i.e., the top. generated by it is the one given on X. – Math boi Jan 10 '23 at 16:40
  • @F_M_ could you please confirm if what I've understood is correct or not? – Math boi Jan 10 '23 at 16:41
  • 1
    See Confusion Regarding Munkres's Definition of Basis for a Topology. My answer is especially thorough, but the other answers and comments are also worth looking at. – Dave L. Renfro Jan 10 '23 at 19:19
  • 1

3 Answers3

3

Munkres' notation is perhaps a bit confusing.

Given a set $X$ and a collection $\mathscr B$ of subsets of $X$, we define the collection $\mathscr T (\mathscr B)$ of subsets of $X$ generated by $\mathscr B$ via

$U \in \mathscr T (\mathscr B)$ if and only if for each $x \in U$ there exists $B \in \mathscr B$ such that $x \in B \subset U$.

Clearly $\mathscr B \subset \mathscr T (\mathscr B)$. When is $\mathscr T (\mathscr B)$ a topology on $X$?

In the definition at the beginning of §13 Munkres introduces the concept of a basis for a topology on a set $X$. This is a collection $\mathscr B$ of subsets of $X$ such that

  1. For each $x \in X$, there is at least one basis element $B$ containing $x$.
  2. If $x$ belongs to the intersection of two basis elements $B_1$ and $B_2$, then there is a basis element $B_3$ containing $x$ such that $B_3 \subset B_1 \cap B_2$.

Note that $X$ is just a set, it does not yet have a topology. Thus basis for a topology on $X$ does not mean that we are given a topology on $X$, but Munkres shows that $\mathscr T (\mathscr B)$ is a topology on $X$. Thus $\mathscr T (\mathscr B)$ is the topology generated by the basis $\mathscr B$.

It is moreover easy to see that the above conditions 1. and 2. are not only sufficient, but also necessary for $\mathscr T (\mathscr B)$ being a topology.

In Lemma 13.1 Munkres gives an alternative characterization of the topology $\mathscr T (\mathscr B)$; it is the set of all unions of elements of $\mathscr B$.

This shows in particular that $\mathscr T(\mathscr B)$ is the coarsest topology on $X$ containing $\mathscr B$ since each topology $\mathscr T$ contains all unions of members of $\mathscr T$.

However, Munkres' formulation of Lemma 13.1 may be misleading because it states "let $\mathscr B$ be a basis for a topology $\mathscr T$ on $X$". This seems to indicate that we are given a topology $\mathscr T$ on $X$, but this is not the case. Munkres should have better said

Let $X$ be a set; let $\mathscr B$ be a basis for a topology on $X$. Then the topology $\mathscr T (\mathscr B)$ generated by $\mathscr B$ equals the collection of all unions of elements of $\mathscr B$.

After that Munkres writes

We have described in two different ways how to go from a basis to the topology it generates. Sometimes we need to go in the reverse direction, from a topology to a basis generating it. Here is one way of obtaining a basis for a given topology; we shall use it frequently.
$\phantom{} $
Lemma 13.2. Let $X$ be a topological space. Suppose that $\mathscr C$ is a collection of open sets of $X$ such that for each open set $U$ of $X$ and each $x$ in $U$, there is an element $C$ of $\mathscr C$ such that $x \in C \subset U$. Then $\mathscr C$ is a basis for the topology of $X$.

In this lemma "the topology of $X$" is of course the given topology on the topological space $X$.

Thus I would say that Munkres actually has two different concepts of "basis":

  • A basis $\mathscr B$ for a topology on a set $X$. In this case no topology is given, but $\mathscr B$ generates one.

  • A basis $\mathscr C$ for a topological space $X$. In this case a topology $\mathscr T$ is given on the set $X$ and $\mathscr C$ is required to be a subset of $\mathscr T$ satisfying the following condition:

For each $U \in \mathscr T$ and each $x \in U$ there exists an element $C \in \mathscr C$ such that $x \in C \subset U$.

In Lemma 13.2 Munkres shows that if $\mathscr C$ is a basis for a topological space $X$ with given topology $\mathscr T$, then $\mathscr C$ is a basis for a topology on $X$ and $\mathscr T (\mathscr C) = \mathscr T$.

Note that the condition characterizing a basis for a topological space seems to be weaker than the two conditions characterizing a basis for a topology on a set; but the essential point is the requirement $\mathscr C \subset \mathscr T$.

In fact, a basis of a topological space allows to represent each open set as a union of elements of the basis.

Paul Frost
  • 76,394
  • 12
  • 43
  • 125
0

Let be $(X,\tau_x)$the topological space. Let $\mathcal B$={$C\subseteq X$,open} with the property that for every open set $U\subseteq X $ and for every $x\in U$, $ \exists C \in \mathcal C$ such that $x\in C_x\subset U$. To prove $\mathcal C$ is a base we take a generic open set $A\subseteq X$ and we show we can write $A$ as an union of element of $\mathcal C$. Since A is open $\forall x \in A, \exists C_x$ such that $x\in C_x \subset A$. Just take $A=\bigcup_{x\in A}C_x=A$. You can do it for every $A\in \tau_x$ so $\mathcal C$ is a base. $\square$

0

The definition of topological basis comes before the definition of topology.

Definition: Let $X$ be a set and $\mathcal B\subset 2^X$ be a subset of the power set of $X$. Then, $\mathcal B$ is a topological basis if i) $\mathcal B$ is a covering of $X$. ii) For all $U,W\in\mathcal B$ and $x\in U\cap V$, there exists a $W\in\mathcal B$ such that $x\in W\subset U\cap B.$

Let $X$ be a topological space. Suppose that $\mathcal{C}$ is a collection of open sets of $X$ such that for each open set $U$ of $X$ and each $x$ in $U$, there is an element $C$ of $\mathcal C$ such that $x ∈ C ⊂ U$. We will show that $\mathcal C$ is a topologicl basis: It is clear that $\mathcal C$ covers $X$. So, (i) is satisfied. Let $U, V\in\mathcal C$ and $x\in U\cap V$. Obviously $U$ and $V$ are open sets so $U\cap V$ is open set. So, by definition of $\mathcal C$, there is an open set $W\in\mathcal C$ such that $x\in W\subset U\cap V$. (ii) is satisfies and $\mathcal C$ is a basis. $\mathcal C$ clearly generates the given topology, since any open set of $X$ can be written as a union of some elements of $\mathcal C$. So $\mathcal C$ is a basis of the given topology.

Bob Dobbs
  • 10,988