-3

I have the following definition.

Let $X$ be a set. A topology on $X$ is a family $\tau$ of subsets of $X$ such that

(i) $\emptyset,X\in\tau$

(ii) if $U_i\in \tau$ for all $i\in I$ where $I$ is some index set, then $\bigcup_{i\in I}U_i\in\tau$; and

(iii) if $U,V\in\tau$ then $U\cap V\in\tau$.

(Quick) Question: In (ii), need the index set be countable?

Eric Wofsey
  • 330,363

1 Answers1

2

(The comments answered this, just to take this out of the unanswered queue)

No, there are no restrictions on what the index set must be in the union in the definition of a topology - this is commonly stated as the fact that the arbitrary union of open sets is open.

In fact, there arise many situations where it is important that one is allowed to take an uncountable union of open sets, see some discussion about the immediate difference it makes here Is there a difference between allowing only countable unions/intersections, and allowing arbitrary (possibly uncountable) unions/intersections? and What is the motivation behind the arbitrary union topological axiom? (There are many many more instances though where this comes up once you do more topology, for instance the distinction between finite/countable/uncountable union becomes a very important distinction when talking about things like Lindelof spaces and compactness)