I was requested to show $11|3^{2n+2}+2^{6n+1}$ for $n \in \mathbb{N}$. I tried using induction. Since $n=1$ yields $81+128=209=11\cdot 19$ we can safely assume $3^{2k+2}+2^{6k+1}=11m$ for some $k \in \mathbb{N}$. Then we can consider the case for
$$3^{2(k+1)+2}+2^{6(k+1)+1}=3^{2k+4}+2^{6k+7}$$
Notice that $$ \begin{align} 3^{2k+4}+2^{6k+7} &= 3^{2k+2+2}+2^{6k+1+6} \\ &=3^{2k+2}\cdot 3^2+2^{6k+1}\cdot2^6 \end{align} $$
This seems promising, but I can't find anything to do with it. Yes, we assumed $11|3^{2k+2}+2^{6k+1}$. However, for $11$ to divide a linear combination of the two terms (as the one we find in our inductive step), we should know $11$ divides each term separately, which is not something we know.
Another despaired attempt was trying to make use of the fact that $3$, $2$ and $11$ are all primes. I know $m|n$ if and only if, for their prime factorizations $m=p_1^{e_1}p_2^{e_2}...p_k^{e_k}, n=p_1^{f_1}p_2^{f_2}...p_k^{f_k}$, we have $e_i \leq f_i$ for all $i$. However, what can we know about the prime factorization of $3^{2k+2}+2^{6k+1}$?
I'm pretty sure using induction is not the simplest way to show this (and I'm totally sure prime properties is completely desperate), and yet I have no other ideas on how to go about the problem. How can this property be demonstrated?
For the possible final step observe that,
$$\begin{align}3^{2k+4}+2^{6k+7}&=9\left(11m-2^{6k+1}\right)+2^{6k+7}\ &=99m-9\cdot2^{6k+1}+2^{6k+7}\ &=99m+2^{6k+1}\left(2^6-9\right)\ &=11\left(9m+5\cdot 2^{6k+1}\right).\end{align}$$
This completes your proof.
– lone student Nov 12 '22 at 15:03